FAQ News Search Archive Forum IRC nZone Articles Tweaks Technology Files Prices Folding
Need Memory?
Popular Articles

GeForce3 SuperSampling
By: Typedef Enum - December 1, 2001

Quake3 2xFSAA Comparison

First up is 2xFSAA. Let's get right down to it, shall we? Please click on the image for the full-size screenshot.

1.5x1.5 SSAA


One thing should really stand out: like the side-effect of the ATI 8500, Super-Sampling does wonders for textures. This image nearly appears to have anisotropic-filtering enabled...but it surely does not. Let's take a look at some closeups.


1.5x1.5 SSAA 2xMSAA

I was actually a little surprised that the MSAA shot seems to be inferior to the Super-Sampling counterpart, until I took one thing into account: The GF/GTS 2x method is actually 1.5x1.5, which is 2.25 vs. 2. So, when put in this light, it does make sense, since the Super-Sampling method is actually using more samples than the Multi-Sampling one. How about the performance? Again, you've got to bear in mind that we lose a heck of a lot of GF3 features in using this 'hack.'

Not too shabby, given the circumstances. Let's take a look and see how the 4xFSAA plays out.

Next Page: Quake3 4xFSAA Compared

Skip To:


Last Updated on December 1, 2001

Copyright 1998-2003. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.

Privacy Policy

FastCounter by bCentral

 Visitors Are Online
Powered by Perlonline.com
Graphics Utilities
Add-In Cards
For Developers