Home Archive Search Forum Reviews IRC Chat Shop


Search Site
NVIDIA Stuff
Executive Profiles
NVIDIA Drivers
Laptop Drivers
Beta Drivers
Archived Drivers
Driver Feedback
GPU Computing
OpenCL Computing
Direct Compute
Desktop Products
Workstation GPUs
Desktop GPUs
Laptop GPUs
Netbook GPUs
Handheld Devices
Portable Media
Automotive Devices
Server Solutions
Application Engines
Apple Products
Game Consoles
System Tools
Power Packs
Get A Balanced PC
Pure Video SD
Pure Video HD
Extreme HD
GeForce PC Kit
NVIDIA 3D Vision
NVIDIA Cool Stuff
NVIDIA Software
NVIDIA PhysX
NVIDIA CUDA Zone
GPU Venture Zone
NVIDIA nZone
NVIDIA SLI Zone
SLI App Request
SLI Profile Patches
Developer Zone
NVIDIA Support
FreeBSD Support
Linux Support
Solaris Support
NVISION '08
GPU Conference '09
NVIDIA at CES '10
PAX East 2010 1
NVIDIA nTersect
NVIDIA Newsroom
NVIDIA at Facebook
NVIDIA at Flickr
NVIDIA at Twitter
NVIDIA at YouTube
NVCUDA at YouTube
NVIDIA Online Store
1 March 26, 2010
EVGA Stuff
EVGA E-LEET
EVGA Precision
GPU Voltage Tuner
SLI Enhancement
EVGA Gear
Reviews and Awards
Articles
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GT 240
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTS
GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7900 GTX
GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7800 GTX
Watercooling Project
My Book 500GB
Raptor Hard Drive
Guide To Doom 3
Other Stuff
Game Releases
  By Date
  Alphabetical
Litigation
  FTC vs. Intel Corp.
Steam
  Hardware Survey
CES 2010
  Press Conference
GF100 White Papers
  GPU Architecture
  GF100 Compute

Creative 3D Blaster 5 FX5900 Ultra Review - Page 5 Of 7

UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2003

I've included a number of benchmark results from Unreal Tournament 2003, which are based on the Flyby test using the following settings:

  • (3) Resolutions - 1024x768, 1280x1204 and 1600x1200
  • (6) Settings - No AA/No AF, 2X AA/8X AF, 4X AA/8X AF, 4XS AA/8X, 6X AA/8X and 8X AA/8X AF
  • (7) Maps - Antalus, Asbestos, Citadel, Face3, Inferno, Phobos2 and Sun Temple

Results at each resolution are followed with a table showing the percent impact antialiasing had on performance. The final series of test results show the increased performance that was achieved by overclocking.

UT2003 - Face3
UT2003 - Face3 Map

Benchmarks were conducted using version 2.1 of [H]ardOCP’s UT2003 Benchmarking utility. Results are in average frames per second.

1024x768 Resolution

At a resolution of 1024x768, Flyby performance on the 3D Blaster 5 FX5900 Ultra with No AA/No AF ranges from 157 fps on the Citadel map to 221 fps on Asbestos. The difference in performance when playing UT2003 on an outdoor map compared to an indoor map can be large.

Generally speaking, you should fine-tune the graphics settings in UT2003, and other games, to support the worst case scenario (i.e., an outdoor map with a large number of players).

UT2003 Flyby Benchmark Results - 1024x768
UT2003 Flyby Benchmark Results - 1024x768

The transition from No AA/No AF to 2X AA/8X AF results in an average loss of 35% in five of the seven maps with Face3 (14%) and Citadel (12%) being the least impacted. However, note that the loss in performance is less than 5% in each map when increasing the level of antialiasing from 2X to 4X. Moving from 4X AA to 4XS AA and higher results in another round of massive hits.

The following table illustrates the percent impact on performance when increasing the level of antialiasing from the previous level.

UT2003 Flyby Antialiasing Impact - 1024x768
UT2003 Flyby Antialiasing Impact - 1024x768

For example, moving from 2X to 4X antialiasing on the Inferno map caused a 7% drop in the average frame rate. Moving from 4X to 4XS antialiasing on the same map caused at 46% drop.

UT2003 - Citadel
UT2003 - Citadel Map

1280x1024 Resolution

It's been my experience that actual gameplay performance can be estimated by dividing the Fly results by two. Although these results are from 1280x1024, using 4X AA/8X AF at 1280x960 is certainly a possibility with the 3D Blaster 5 FX5900 Ultra.

UT2003 Flyby Benchmark Results - 1280x1024
UT2003 Flyby Benchmark Results - 1280x1024

As expected, the relative impact of antialiasing on performance increases across the board as the resolution increases. At the same time, the amount of memory required by enabling antialiasing at higher resolutions also increases. For example, using 4X AA at a resolution of 1024x768 requires approximately 38 MB of memory while moving to 1280x1024 increases the requirement to 83 MB.

UT2003 Flyby Antialiasing Impact - 1280x1024
UT2003 Flyby Antialiasing Impact - 1280x1024

Today's high-end graphics cards are extremely powerful as they are able to render a frame of data in 1/60th of a second with AA/AF enabled.

UT2003 - Phobos2
UT2003 - Phobos2 Map

1600x1200 Resolution

It wasn't too long ago that gamers rejoiced when using 4X AA/8X AF at a resolution of 1024x768 became a reality. But we'll have to wait a few hardware generations before 4X AA becomes commonplace at 1600x1200.

UT2003 Flyby Benchmark Results - 1600x1200
UT2003 Flyby - Benchmark Results - 1600x1200

UT2003 Flyby Antialiasing Impact - 1600x1200
UT2003 Flyby Antialiasing Impact - 1600x1200

1600x1200 Overclocking

Then again, we might be able to shave off some time by accelerating the rate at which core and memory frequencies are increasing. For this test, I overclocked the 3D Blaster FX5900 Ultra to 515MHz/950MHz and performed the 1600x1200 benchmarks again.

UT2003 Flyby Overclocking Results - 1600x1200
UT2003 Flyby Overclocking Results - 1600x1200 - Core Clock = 515MHz / Memory Clock = 950MHz

Even with the 10-15% increase in performance from overclocking, were still a good 30% lower than the results with 4X AA at 1280x1024.

UT2003 Flyby Overclocking Impact - 1600x1200
UT2003 Flyby Overclocking Impact - 1600x1200 - Core Clock = 515MHz / Memory Clock = 950MHz

The 3D Blaster 5 FX5900 Ultra offers an excellent gaming experience in UT2003. Frame rates, with use of AA and AF at Quality settings, are at a level that produces a smooth feel to this fast paced game under a variety of graphics settings. Those of you with 19 or 21-inch monitors will be appreciative of being able to crank up the resolution as I found 1600x1200 with 2X AA/8X AF a setting that produced good performance for me throughout UT2003.

Next Page: Neverwinter Nights And Morrowind Gameplay

Last Updated on September 11, 2003


Table of Contents

Shop Online at PriceGrabber

nV News - Copyright © 1998-2011. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owner is prohibited.
Search Products
Search
for


Graphics Utilities
AMD GPU Clock Tool
ATITool
aTuner
EVGA Precision
EVGA Voltage Tuner
Gainward ExperTool
GPU-Shark
GPU Voltage Tuner
Fraps
FurMark
GLview
GPU Caps Viewer
GPU Shark
GPU-Z
MSI Afterburner
nHancer
NiBiTor
NVClock (Linux)
NvTempLogger
NVTray
PowerStrip
RivaTuner
SLI Profile Tool
3DCenter Filter Test
3DMark Vantage
Add-In Partners
Albatron
ASUS
AXLE
BFG Technologies
BIOSTAR
Chaintech
Colorful
ELSA
EVGA
GAINWARD
GALAXY
GIGABYTE
FORSA
FOXCONN
Inno3D
Jaton
Leadtek
MSI
Palit
PNY
Point of View
Prolink
SPARKLE
XFX
ZOGIS
ZOTAC
For Developers
ACM SIGGRAPH
AMD
DevMaster.net
flipCode
Gamasutra
GameDev.net
GPGPU
Intel
Microsoft
CiteSeer
NeHe Productions
NVIDIA
OpenGL.org
Programmers Heaven
Real-Time Rendering
Stanford Graphics
3dRender.com
Associates
Benchmark Reviews
Fraps
GeForce Italia
GPU Review
Hardware Pacers
LaptopVideo2Go
MVKTECH
News3D (NVITALIA)
OutoftheBoxMods
OSNN.net
Overclocker Cafe
PC Extreme
PC Gaming Standards
PhysX Links & Info
TestSeek
3DChip (German)
8Dimensional