Home FAQ Search Archive Forum IRC Prices Reviews Tweaks Benchmarks Files DistComp


Check out Xoxide!
Xoxide Computer Mods
Product Search
Search
for


Benchmarks
Lost Planet
Shop Online
AMD64
Compare at AMD
5200+ X2
6000+ X2
Phenom 9600
Phenom 9750
Phenom 9850
Phenom 9950
Intel Core 2
Compare at Intel
Duo E8400
Duo E8500
Quad Q6600
Quad Q9300
Quad Q9550
Quad QX9650
Intel Core i7
I7-920
I7-940
I7-965 EE
Drivers/Support
Events
Articles
Associates
Gainward GeForce PowerPack! Ultra/650-8X XP “Golden Sample” - Page 14 Of 17

Return To Castle Wolfenstein: Performance

I remember the hype when ID announced the development of Return To Castle of Wolfenstein. Everyone was running around like crazy trying to find out as much as they could about this title. If I recall correctly it was the E3 (2001) that spread the propaganda of RTCW. ID's booth was nicely decorated. It sure gave creeps :) Looked like they exposed an entire scene from the game! Pretty awsome.

The game is based on an improved Quake III engine. Of course the graphics are far better than Quake's. So is the gameplay :) We've tested the retail version along with a patch (1.41). All details were set to high/maximum. As to the game type we ran all the benchmarks in a multiplayer mode as it always performs a bit worse than single player. MP_Beach was used as our testing map. It has both outside and inside environment.

P4: 1.6A @ 2.39GHz / 512MB PC2100 / Stock Gainward Ti4600
AMD: Athlon XP 1900+ @ 1.6GHz / 512MB PC2100 / Stock Gainward Ti4200

As you can see, three resolution modes were benchmarked: 800x600, 1024x768 and 1280x1024. Despite the system specs, both cards performed pretty well. No AA and No AF gave us pretty numbers: 90, 81, 72 respectively. Even enabling 2X Antialiasing and 2X Anisotropic filtering, the game was very playable at both 1024x768 and 1280x1024 resolutions. Our Ti4200 did quite good with lower resolutions, but then again not many of us hardcore gamers use it (it's good if you want to run Aniso at application mode and bump up that Antialiasing to 4X). Even applying 4X Aniso wasn't that bad at all. It started to get jumpy at 1280x1024 though. Hell...if you want to run 4X AA without any AF you will be golden.

The ultimate mode? Again, this is not the perfect card for games at 1280x1024 with AA and AF enabled. Believe me you won't be happy with the performance. There is not enough fillrate to satisfy those resolutions and IQ settings. You will be a happy camper with 1024x768, 2X Antialiasing and 4X Anisotropic filtering. BUT if you want to remove some of the jaggies from the screen, 1280x1024 resolution will do the trick quite well.


Table of Contents

Last Updated on April 12, 2003

Copyright © 1998-2004. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.

Privacy Policy


FastCounter by bCentral

 Visitors Are Online
Powered by Perlonline.com
Shopping.com
What Are You Shopping For?



Categories
Graphics Utilities
Add-In Cards