nV News Deals Shop Archive Search Files Forum Feed Articles IRC Chat GeForce.com

Search Site
Ads by Google
News Room
GeForce Technology
DirectX 11
3D Vision
3D Vision Surround
GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GT 240
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTS
GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7900 GTX
GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7800 GTX
Watercooling Project
My Book 500GB
Raptor Hard Drive
Guide To Doom 3
EVGA Stuff
EVGA Precision
GPU Voltage Tuner
OC Scanner
SLI Enhancement
Reviews and Awards
Benchmark Reviews
GeForce Italia
GPU Review
Hardware Pacers
Overclocker Cafe
PC Extreme
PC Gaming Standards
PhysX Links & Info
3DChip (German)
Gainward GeForce4 PowerPack! Ultra/750-8X XP Golden Sample Review - Page 5 Of 7


Another familiar benchmark utility here from nVidia.
NOTE: Keep in mind that the scale on the graphs is 0 ~ 350 FPS, ChamelonMark results are on a much lower scale so they may appear to be low at first glance while they are actually on par for a similar system setup.


Not only does this benchmark add some variety into the real world performance benchmarking approach, it's also one of my favorite multiplayer games. This benchmark takes advantage of Dungeon Siege's unique technique of constantly streaming information across the AGP bus instead of the traditional "wait, load level, go" and as such is an intensive test on your CPU and video card.

NOTE: The values shown in the graph below are the average, high and low values are not shown.

In the graph below, the Default Settings indicates that no changes were made to the game's default video, sound and effects options. Max Settings indicates that the following settings were changed:

  • Shadows: All Complex
  • Texture Filtering: Trilenear
  • Object Detail: Max
  • EAX: On

It's difficult to elaborate much on these results in all honesty. This is due to the fact that a de facto standard hasn't really been established yet. The "Mine's Faster!" article in the April 2003 issue of PC Gamer is interesting, if a bit lite. They gloss over the very details regarding the DSBenchmark that I was hoping to see when they state:

"Please note that we make several custom changes to the files in this test to ensure that the game runs at full detail with every card on the market. So, while you can use the downloadable benchmark as-is, your scores may differ from ours."

Just a bit vague isn't it? Their results grid also isn't clear as to what tests had AA enabled. Getting into the details wasn't within the scope of that article though I'm sure, so I may try to contact them directly to get more information. So, my best guess at exactly what "ensure that the game runs at full detail" means is in the bulleted list above.


Before we get to the obligatory Quake 3 and UT 2003 benchmarks, how about a nice diversion with no graphs or decimal points? That's doublespeak for, "frankly, I wasn't satisfied with my own attempts to at devising a benchmarking approach for this game". For one thing, this is the initial demo that I used and there's no benchmark utility/procedure that I'm aware of. I tried using FRAPS during certain paths through the game (that I did the best to duplicate each time) but it just didn't feel right. So, instead of forcing the issue now I decided to focus more on my overall impression of performance (extremely vague I know) as well as giving attention to an interesting graphical anomaly. So, here it goes...

This game is a graphical buffet of eye candy. If you haven't seen it yet, you should. The lighting and shadows are nothing short of amazing. I have it for my Xbox and I thought that was nice but this sucker really shines on the PC.

The overall performance was mixed (keeping in mind that this is the initial demo, not retail and no patches). For the most part it played well at 1024x768 with the default settings and no AA or AF enabled and FRAPS reported numbers in the 40's and it was very playable. This is a stealth game after all and quick, herky-jerky movements (or even running for that matter) are rarely part of the game. It's even slower paced than Morrowind for the most part if that helps paint the picture. So, in my opinion, FPS isn't worth getting worked up about in this game. However, if you do need to run and dodge around quickly (especially going up/down stairs) then it can get a bit choppy. Maxing out the settings (mostly dealing with shadows) didn't seem to affect the appearance or performance of the game too much. Going up to 1600x1200 introduced FPS in the 20's though so that could be considered a bit slow for a game of this pace. Enabling AA and AF didn't really seem to affect performance much at all in 1024x768 but it does make a big difference in visual quality due to the slower pace of the game as you take in your surroundings often.

Now for the strange graphical blip I noticed. In the two 1600x1200 screenshots below, the one on the top is without AA or AF while the one on the bottom is with 4X AA and 4X AF. See what appears to be fog in the bottom image? There is no fog in this part of the game though and you can even detect somewhat of an ordered (albeit fuzzy) grid which is on top of the entire scene.

NOTE: Clicking on image below will load a high-quality1600x1200 PNG file. They're over 2MB each so 56kers beware.

 Fullsize image: Splinter Cell - Good lighting - No AA - No AF
Good lighting - No AA - No AF

Fullsize image: Splinter Cell - Bad lighting - 4X AA - 4X AF
Bad lighting - 4X AA - 4X AF

I can't claim to know what the cause of this is, perhaps it is related to an early bug in the game. I ruled out the Gainward card as I first thought it might be the first (and only) example of a negative side effect to overclocking this card. However, I dropped the core and memory settings to factory defaults and still got the same effect. It didn't appear anywhere else in the demo that I could detect either so it's not a nagging problem.

Below are two more images of a cropped area from the same images at 200% magnification.

Good lighting - No AA - No AF
Good lighting - No AA - No AF

Bad lighting - 4X AA - 4X AF
Bad lighting - 4X AA - 4X AF

Next Page: Quake 3 / Unreal Tournament 2003

Table of Contents

Last Updated on March 10, 2003

Copyright 1998-2004. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.

Privacy Policy

FastCounter by bCentral

 Visitors Are Online
Powered by Perlonline.com
What Are You Shopping For?

Graphics Utilities
Add-In Cards