FAQ News Search Archive Forum IRC nZone Articles Tweaks Technology Files Prices Folding
Need Memory?
Popular Articles

NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 440 Experiences
By: Jonathan Martini - April 9, 2002


On February 6th NVIDIA had their widest product launch yet. The GeForce4 burst onto the scene with five new products to supply a variety of different price and performance sectors. Traditionally, a new launch was a one-product aimed solely at the high-end with an accommodating price for that sector. The elevated prices descended in due time as the product line diversified to enter two new markets: the lower priced “budget” market segment as well as the higher priced “extreme” market. We witnessed this occur with the GeForce2 GTS from which the GeForec2 MX and GeForce2 Ultra product lines were announced several months later. The GeForce3 received the same treatment with the announcement of the GeForce3 Ti 200 and Ti 500 just shy of six months ago. This five product wide launch provides a new jolt to the video card market.


            The various GeForce4 chipsets are positioned to replace every NVIDIA card currently on the market. Not every GeForce4 is an equal though. The product line is divided into two very distinct segments aimed at conquering different markets. The GeForce4 Ti chipset is the rightful heir to receive the NVIDIA performance crown from the GeForce3. The GeForce4 MX on the other hand, is a sort of mishmash of various new technologies while missing a key feature of the GeForce3. The GeForce4 MX supports NVIDIA’s new Accuview Antialiasing format, a trimmed down version of the Lightspeed Memory Architecture II as well as nView. nView is a much more feature filled and robust version of NVIDIA’s TwinView, which allows multi-monitor display capabilities. Accuview AA and the Lightspeed Memory Architecture are clearly explained in Mike’s preview of the GeForce4 here. The GeForce4 MX lacks the programmable transformation and lighting engine (nFinite Effects Engine) found in the GeForce3 lineup. With NVIDIA touting the nFinite Effects Engine as one of the great features of the GeForce3, many wonder why it isn’t included in the GeForce4 MX.

Since its announcement, the GeForce4 MX nomenclature has earned many a negative feedback for its lacking nFinite Effects Engine. We will analyze the performance of the GeForce4 MX in various tests, but the following image demonstrates what all the fuss is about.

The GeForce3 Ti 200 (the “low-end” GeForce3) is 25% percent faster than the GeForce4 MX? The GeForce4 MX is slower than the least performing GF3? Then why is it called a GeForce4? Isn’t that misleading? I can’t begin to count the number of times I’ve seen people post/complain in various forums about how NVIDIA is intentionally misleading customers with the GeForce4 nametag and how the “unsavvy” computer purchaser will make a bad purchase by getting a GeForce4 MX. I believe this is all useless banter as 1) the GeForce4 MX is a technological step down from the GeForce3, and nobody that owns a GeForce3 isn’t “in the know”. 2) The MX line is intended for budget purposes by having less performing core and memory speeds. The GeForce2 MX core was also depraved of two of the original GeForce2’s four graphics pipelines as well as being paired up with SD RAM. The GeForce4 MX on the other hand is similarly chopped by only having two pipelines as well as not incorporating the nFinite Effects Engine. The GeForce4 MX provides plenty of features, just don’t expect it to come close to the performance of a GeForce4 Ti. As the old saying goes, “You get what you pay for.”

Next Page: The subject - The GeForce4 MX 440

[an error occurred while processing this directive]


Last Updated on April 9, 2002

Copyright © 1998-2003. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in any form or medium without written permission of the site's owners is prohibited.

Privacy Policy

FastCounter by bCentral

 Visitors Are Online
Powered by Perlonline.com
Graphics Utilities
Add-In Cards
For Developers