Inno3D Home Page Inno3D Home Page

FAQ News Search Archive Forum Articles Tweaks Technology Files Prices SETI
Visit NVIDIA's home page.
Favorite Pics
Click to Enlarge
Articles/Reviews
OCZ Tech Titan 3
Absolute MORPHEUS
1.0GHz Pentium III
eVGA MX Shootout
nForce Preview
AMD AXIA CPU
VisionTek GeForce3
2001 Spring Lineup
GeForce3 Preview
eVGA TwinView Plus
VisionTek GF2 Ultra
OCZ GeForce2 Pro
Winfast GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 vs Quake3
Linksys Cable Router
GF2 FSAA Shootout
GeForce2 MX Preview
Benchmarking Guide
Quake 3 Tune-Up
Power DVD Review
Live! Experiences
Sponsors
Memory from Crucial.com


FastCounter by bCentral

 Visitors Are Online
Powered by Perlonline.com
Drivers/FAQ
NVIDIA
3D Chipset
Gamers Ammo
Reactor Critical
GeForce FAQ
Associates
Dayton's Misc.
G-Force X Sweden
Maximum Reboot
Media Xplosion
NVchips-fr
nV Italia
Riva Station
3D GPU
nV News Home Page

Intel Pentium 3 1GHz Processor Review
By: Mike Chambers - July 25, 2001

Skip To:

Overclocking

I wasn't expecting too much in the area of overclocking since I already had two strikes against me. The first strike is the unfriendly overclocking behavior of the reference GeForce3 card I'm currently using. The second strike is that the 1GHz Pentium 3 is the fastest speed based on the Coppermine core which leaves little room for overclockability.

Nevertheless, I gave it a shot and was able to squeeze out an extra 50MHz by upping the front side bus (FSB) speed on the motherboard's BIOS from 133MHz to 140MHz. A higher FSB caused Quake 3 to lock up the system immediately upon entering the game. This was also the case with the 700MHz processor, which is based on a 100MHz FSB speed, when I tried to move beyond a 105MHz FSB speed.

Overclocking Performance - 1024x768

At a resolution of 1024x768, I realized a 5% increase in performance in Serious Sam and Unreal Tournament, a 4% increase in Quake 3, and a 2% increase in Nascar Heat. Not exactly earth shattering, but the extra performance could be used to enable additional graphics and/or sound options.

Conclusion

One point that requires mentioning is that the 1GHz processor is based on a 133MHz FSB speed and the 700MHz is based on a 100 FSB speed. However, the difference in performance between the two processors due solely to the higher FSB speed is marginal at best.

I'm a firm believer that upgrading to a faster graphics card is a cost-effective way to increase a system's 3D performance. Of course the previous statement is also dependent of the type of processor being used at the time of the upgrade. Over the years, I've experienced increases of over 50% just by moving up to a faster graphics card. As a case in point, there are occasions where a 700MHz processor and GeForce3 outperform a 1GHz+ processor and a GeForce2 Ultra.

On the other hand, there are cases when a processor upgrade is worthwhile. One reason to upgrade is to tap into the additional performance that a graphics card can provide a system with a more powerful processor. However, caution should be exercised in this scenario, as the graphics card may not be powerful enough to suit your needs.

For example, outfitting a 1GHz+ processor with a GeForce2 MX would be counter-productive when trying to maximize 3D graphics performance. In this situation, the GeForce2 MX typically becomes a performance bottleneck when running today's graphics intensive games at resolutions greater than 800x600 in 32-bit color. A more powerful graphics card, such as those based on the GeForce2 Pro, Ultra, or GeForce3, would be a better choice.

At the time this article was published, the 1GHz Pentium 3 processor is selling for around $180. If I took the percent increase in frame rate for each game and resolution I tested, the results would be as follows - 30.25 frames per second at 1024x768 and 25.5 frames per second at 1280x1024.

Overall, I'm delighted with the processor upgrade which will extend the life of my system for a bit longer.

Back to nV News

Skip To:

 
Last Updated on July 25, 2001

All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners.