nV News Deals Shop Archive Search Files Forum Feed Articles IRC Chat GeForce.com


Search Site
Ads by Google
Links To NVIDIA
Drivers
Products
Communities
Support
NVIDIA Blog
News Room
About NVIDIA
GeForce Technology
CUDA
DirectX 11
Optimus
PhysX
SLI
3D Vision
3D Vision Surround
Articles
GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GT 240
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTS
GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7900 GTX
GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7800 GTX
Watercooling Project
My Book 500GB
Raptor Hard Drive
Guide To Doom 3
EVGA Stuff
EVGA E-LEET
EVGA Precision
GPU Voltage Tuner
OC Scanner
SLI Enhancement
EVGA Bot
EVGA Gear
Reviews and Awards
Associates
Benchmark Reviews
Fraps
GeForce Italia
GPU Review
Hardware Pacers
LaptopVideo2Go
MVKTECH
News3D (NVITALIA)
OutoftheBoxMods
OSNN.net
Overclocker Cafe
PC Extreme
PC Gaming Standards
PhysX Links & Info
TestSeek
3DChip (German)
8Dimensional
Palit Daytona GeForce FX5200 Ultra Review Page 3 of 5

Splinter Cell

 

Splinter Cell Benchmark Results








Splinter Cell is a very slow-paced game which places a great emphasis on slowly sneaking around in the dark. As such, when running the timedemo, I elected to keep the Shadow Level setting at high, as Splinter Cell wouldn't be the same game without the sweet and important shadow effects. Shadow Mode was left at the Buffer setting, which is the default setting for the GeForce class of cards and is the recommended setting by Ubisoft. The settings I modified for the various tests are the Shadow Resolution and Effects Quality settings. The Shadow Resolution setting was set at High for the first two rounds of testing then lowered to Medium for the last maps. The Effects Quality setting varied from Very High to Medium.

Since Splinter Cell's focus is slow and quiet spying over the all-out-action we're accustomed to seeing in the first person shooter genre, the game's performance is considered playable at much lower FPS than is typically considered acceptable for smooth performance when playing first-person shooters. The first three maps have similar performance results which allows the game to be smooth in most circumstances at 800x600 with the High/Very High settings for Shadow Resolution and Effects Quality. The Beyond3D Caspian Oil demo takes it's toll on the card as the level truly stresses the pixel shader paths of the card.

 

Tron 2.0 Demo - High Detail


Tron 2.0 Demo - Medium Detail


Tron 2.0 Demo Benchmark Results




The first of the games covered using FRAPS to measure the in-game performance is the Tron 2.0 Demo. A very cool little game with an extremely unique art concept wherein the characters and levels are composed solely of various shades of black and illuminescent borders. The High Detail picture above displays how truly illuminescent the borders can be. The overall effects is extremely cool and brings much more to the setting of the game than the rather drab textures in the Medium Detail setting. I wouldn't even consider playing the game at any setting other than the High Detail setting. Doing so wouldn't do justice to the game and all the cool glowing effects provided by the Lithtech engine.

Battlefield 1942: Secret Weapons of WWII Demo

Being one of the most popular online games at the moment, performance numbers from Battlefield 1942 couldn't be overlooked. I tested the recent Secret Weapons of WWII demo as I've been hooked on it since it was released a few weeks ago. Testing the performance was a tad different than other games where I'd just let FRAPS count the frames and post the average. There's a couple reasons for this: 1 - The performance of the game when waiting to spawn was a tad different than in-game performance 2 - I was waiting to respawn quite often. ;) Therefore I would activate FRAPS' framerate logging system when I would respawn, try to do some damage and then deactivate it the moment I would be killed. After about an hour of playing I had a huge list of scores with the average framerate being right up around 50 FPS at 800x600. Very acceptable performance for a relatively low-priced card in a game that was reputed to be resource heavy at launch.

F1 Challenge '99-'02

F1 Challenge '99 - '02 is a fairly uncommon game to be included in the review. I burned so much time into this game, that neglecting all that would be quite a waste (not to mention featuring a racing game is a nice change of pace from all the first person shooters so dominant in video card reviews). I'm a great high-speed driver, as such my favourite tracks are Austria's A1-Ring and Italy's Monza circuit. Performance between tracks tend to stay fairly similar hovering around 60 FPS on a nice clean track with a few cars in close proximity. The graphic settings for the test was set at Full, which maxes out all the settings such as viewing distance, car detail, shadows, mirror reflections etc.

The overall gaming performance of the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra surprised me as I wasn't expecting much out of such a low-priced card. While you can't expect to crank every setting to its highest level or enable anything beyond 2X FSAA in every game and still get acceptable performance at resolutions above 1024x768, most gamers looking for a card in this price range couldn't be asking for much more.

Next Page: 3DMark2001 SE and ChameleonMark

Last Updated on September 18, 2003


Table of Contents

Advertisement

nV News - Copyright © 1998-2014.
Search Products
Search
for


Ads by Casale
Tweaks
Metro: Last Light
PlanetSide 2
Miscellaneous Links
AutoDesk 123 Design
Build Your Gaming PC
FPS vs. Frame Time
Free Games And MMOs
GeForce SLI Technology
HPC For Dummies
PC Game Release Dates
Play Classic PC Games
Steam Hardware Survey
Video Game Designers
TechTerms Dictionary
GPU Applications
AMD GPU Clock Tool
AMD System Monitor
ATITool
aTuner
EVGA E-LEET
EVGA OC Scanner
EVGA Precision
EVGA Voltage Tuner
Gainward ExperTool
GPU-Shark
GPU Voltage Tuner
Fraps
FurMark
GLview
GPU Caps Viewer
GPU PerfStudio
GPU Shark
GPU-Z
MSI Afterburner
nHancer
NiBiTor
NVClock (Linux)
NVFlash
NVIDIA Inspector
NvTempLogger
NVTray
PowerStrip
RivaTuner
SLI Profile Tool
The Compressonator
3DCenter Filter Test
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
PhysX Applications
Cell Factor Revolution
Cryostatis Tech Demo
Cube Wall Demo
PhysX FluidMark
Fluid Physics
NV PhysX Tweaker
NVIDIA OPTIX 2
PhysX Downloads
PhysX at YouTube
Add-In Partners
AFOX
ASUS
AXLE
BFG Technologies
BIOSTAR
Chaintech
Colorful
ELSA
emTek
EVGA
GAINWARD
GALAXY
GIGABYTE
FORSA
FOXCONN
Inno3D
Jaton
Leadtek
Manli
MSI
Palit
PNY
Point of View
Prolink
SPARKLE
XFX
ZOGIS
ZOTAC