nV News Deals Shop Archive Search Files Forum Feed Articles IRC Chat GeForce.com


Search Site
Ads by Google
Links To NVIDIA
Drivers
Products
Communities
Support
NVIDIA Blog
News Room
About NVIDIA
GeForce Technology
CUDA
DirectX 11
Optimus
PhysX
SLI
3D Vision
3D Vision Surround
Articles
GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 570
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 480
GeForce GTX 465
GeForce GTX 460
GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 280
GeForce GTX 260
GeForce GT 240
GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 GTX
GeForce 8800 GTS
GeForce 8800 GT
GeForce 8600 GTS
GeForce 8500 GT
GeForce 7950 GX2
GeForce 7950 GT
GeForce 7900 GTX
GeForce 7900 GS
GeForce 7800 GTX
Watercooling Project
My Book 500GB
Raptor Hard Drive
Guide To Doom 3
EVGA Stuff
EVGA E-LEET
EVGA Precision
GPU Voltage Tuner
OC Scanner
SLI Enhancement
EVGA Bot
EVGA Gear
Reviews and Awards
Associates
Benchmark Reviews
Fraps
GeForce Italia
GPU Review
Hardware Pacers
LaptopVideo2Go
MVKTECH
News3D (NVITALIA)
OutoftheBoxMods
OSNN.net
Overclocker Cafe
PC Extreme
PC Gaming Standards
PhysX Links & Info
TestSeek
3DChip (German)
8Dimensional
XFX GeForceFX 5950 Ultra - Page 6 of 6

UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 DEMO

UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 DEMO DEATHMATCH
DM-RANKIN

It is evident that this demo is CPU dependent but it scales very well as a benchmark. With AA settings enabled I was provided with very good frame rates and excellent visual effects.
 
Of course, I benchmarked all the maps with no AA/AF just for those of you who do not use it and for the rest to see maximum frame rates with this card. However, I was surprised to see that enabling AA did not give a significant hit at 2xAA, 2XQxAA, or 4xAA. Once 6XS and 8xAA was used it was a different story, showing a hefty hit on frame rates.

UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004 DEMO ONSLAUGHT
ONS-TORLAN

If this demo is any indication, it appears UT2004, when released, should play very smooth with any combination of AA and AF as long as you limit your AA settings to 4x or less. Personally, I can't wait to tryout the 2XQ antialiasing with all quality settings at maximum.

SYNTHETIC BENCHMARKS
A quick run through of some heavily used synthetic benchmarks to wrap up this review. From the scoring you can compare with results from other reviews and get a feel how well this card compares. I first used Code Creatures as it stresses the newer cards sufficiently and requires good bandwidth

Code Creatures
Using complex nature scenes Code Creatures requires DirectX 8 hardware effects to thoroughly stress even the newest video cards. Although the overall scoring was consistently in the 4,200 ranges with default settings, I decided to just show the FPS results at settings of no antialiasing, 2x, and 4x. Tests were conducted with resolutions of 1024x768, 1280x1024, and 1600x1200.

Code Creatures

At 1024x768, no AA/AF, with default timings of 475/950 frame rates were consistent at 53.4 FPS. With timings of 550/1000 a six frame per second increase of 9% was achieved at 58.5 FPS over default timings.

Enabling antialiasing at 2x gives a drop in frame rates at 9% and with 4xAA a drop of 18% is recorded using default timings. Overclocking gained 4.2 FPS on the 2xAA test or an 8% increase, and 3.2 FPS in the 4xAA test or 7% increase. Resolution of 1280x1024 gave an average of 42.5 FPS at 475/950 and 550/1000 gave an extra 4.2 FPS (9%) increase.

With 2xAA frame rates dropped 4.4 FPS (10%) running default timings and with overclock frame rates dropped 5.6 FPS (12%) from those results recorded with no antialiasing. Overclocking added 3 FPS (7%) with 2xAA over default timings. With a resolution of 1600/1200 with no AA, 33.7 FPS was recorded with default timings and overclocking added 3.7 FPS (10%).

Setting AA at 2x produced 29.8 FPS, a 3.9 FPS (12%) hit, while overclocking increased results 2.9 FPS (9%). At 1600x1200 4xAA dropped frames another 4.1 (14%) from 2xAA while overclocking added 2.4 FPS (9%) over the default 4xAA score.

3DMark2001SE
Still one of the most popular DirectX 8 benchmarking tools, FutureMark's 3DMark 2001SE is used by reviewer and gamers alike for comparing performance. Benchmark testing the XFX FX5950 Ultra was performed in 32-bit mode using pure hardware DirectX support.

3DMark2001SE Results

3DMark2003
FutureMark's very controversial benchmarking tool with DirectX 9 capability, 3Dmark2003, needs no prior introduction. Seems everyone has an opinion on the validity of its application. I still maintain that it is an accurate tool in revealing graphic card performance. However, in this review we limit its use to the basic test with settings of 1024x768 resolution with only 4xAF applied to gauge the XFX FX5950 Ultra's performance at default and overclocked timings.

3DMark2003 Results

The XFX FX5950 Ultra performance results are very good as you would expect from a high end graphics card.

AquaMark3
Using the same Krass engine as found in actual games such as Aquanox 2 and Spellforce this synthetic benchmark is a step in the right direction for a gamer's benchmark. It supports such features as Hyper-Threading, Pixel Shader and Vertex Shader 2.0, and uses a wide range of DirectX 9 effects and features. Using the basic triscore test the XFX FX5950 Ultra yielded the following results:

AquaMark3 Results

CONCLUSION

Expense is one thing and performance is another, this card has both. Currently, selling for just under $400, this card is expensive but if you are seeking top end performance, as in this case, you get what you pay for. While price is generally in the top end among the FX5950 Ultra cards, performance-wise, the XFX FX5950 Ultra is the top end in performance. A potential drawback, other than price, is that the card is big. It takes up two PCI slots and the sheer size could be a problem in some mid-size and smaller cases. The sound from the fan is noticeable under heavy demand but cooling performance is very good, keeping temperatures in check at maximum load with both default timings of 475/950 and with overclocked timings of 550/1000.

Card Installed


 
In every game I played the XFX FX5950 Ultra combined with NVIDIA's ForceWare 55, version 56.56, demonstrated excellent speed and playability along with superb graphic capability. Overall, I can say this card has the capability of enhancing your gaming experience. If the FX5950 Ultra's prices are within your budget then the XFX FX5950 Ultra is the card to get!

Pros

  • Fast

  • Excellent cooling

  • Good game and software package

  • Good selection of accessories included

  • Video-In/Video-Out (VIVO) capability

Cons

  • Expensive

  • Size could present a problem in smaller cases

Back to nV News

Last Updated on April 1, 2004


Table of Contents

Advertisement

nV News - Copyright © 1998-2014.
Search Products
Search
for


Ads by Casale
Tweaks
Metro: Last Light
PlanetSide 2
Miscellaneous Links
AutoDesk 123 Design
Build Your Gaming PC
FPS vs. Frame Time
Free Games And MMOs
GeForce SLI Technology
HPC For Dummies
PC Game Release Dates
Play Classic PC Games
Steam Hardware Survey
Video Game Designers
TechTerms Dictionary
GPU Applications
AMD GPU Clock Tool
AMD System Monitor
ATITool
aTuner
EVGA E-LEET
EVGA OC Scanner
EVGA Precision
EVGA Voltage Tuner
Gainward ExperTool
GPU-Shark
GPU Voltage Tuner
Fraps
FurMark
GLview
GPU Caps Viewer
GPU PerfStudio
GPU Shark
GPU-Z
MSI Afterburner
nHancer
NiBiTor
NVClock (Linux)
NVFlash
NVIDIA Inspector
NvTempLogger
NVTray
PowerStrip
RivaTuner
SLI Profile Tool
The Compressonator
3DCenter Filter Test
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
PhysX Applications
Cell Factor Revolution
Cryostatis Tech Demo
Cube Wall Demo
PhysX FluidMark
Fluid Physics
NV PhysX Tweaker
NVIDIA OPTIX 2
PhysX Downloads
PhysX at YouTube
Add-In Partners
AFOX
ASUS
AXLE
BFG Technologies
BIOSTAR
Chaintech
Colorful
ELSA
emTek
EVGA
GAINWARD
GALAXY
GIGABYTE
FORSA
FOXCONN
Inno3D
Jaton
Leadtek
Manli
MSI
Palit
PNY
Point of View
Prolink
SPARKLE
XFX
ZOGIS
ZOTAC