View Full Version : Crysis CPU/GPU benchmarks, post your's
ukdopeuk
10-27-07, 04:00 PM
Gpu no config/card tweaks etc
1680 x 1050 high
Min FPS: 4.56 , Max FPS: 17.76 Average FPS: 12.99
Min FPS: 4.56 , Max FPS: 18.75 Average FPS: 14.99
Min FPS: 4.56 , Max FPS: 20.18 Average FPS: 15.07
1680 x 1050 medium
Min FPS: 19.27 , Max FPS: 39.11 Average FPS: 27.32
Min FPS: 19.27 , Max FPS: 49.17 Average FPS: 29.72
Min FPS: 19.27 , Max FPS: 49.76 Average FPS: 29.72
1680 x 1050 low
Min FPS: 50.56 , Max FPS: 105.22 Average FPS: 68.02
Min FPS: 50.56 , Max FPS: 105.22 Average FPS: 76.76
Min FPS: 50.56 , Max FPS: 105.22 Average FPS: 76.74
Q6600 ip35 2gig ballistix 8500 xfxgeforce 7950gx2
1680x1050 VERY HIGH on all settings. No AA/AF. DX10 Vista
gpu: 17.71 avg
cpu: 16 avg
I'm looking into optimization tweaks but I'm not going to dump some dudes 80 million line config file on it without knowing every single thing its changing from default. ;)
slaWter
10-27-07, 04:31 PM
Settings: Vista x64 (32 Bit .exe), 1920x1080, DX9 (Custom Config)
CPU: AVG=21.91
GPU: AVG=27.02
Config is DX9 on high with these modifications:
r_sunshafts = 1
r_Beams = 1
r_BeamsDistFactor=0.01
r_BeamsMaxSlices=200
r_WaterGodRays = 1
r_UsePom = 1
r_MotionBlur= 0
Looks and plays sweet!
ASUSEN7900GTX
10-27-07, 04:51 PM
THIS IS GPU
RUN 0
MIN 6.46
AVG 22.40
MAX 31.24
RUN 1
MIN 6.46
AVG 27.54
MAX 37.11
CPU
Min 6.98
AVG 23.79
MAX 30.57
well if this is good or not i do not know
bu i know this i need a better system a system that i canīt afford :(
this game really takes advantage of quad cores, I mean I can play at 1920x1200 with an average of 32, and it doesnt drop at all if any under heavy action and explosions, and its a smooth sailing with a quad core. I guess the physics and explosions are all off loaded to the cpu.
ASUSEN7900GTX
10-27-07, 06:09 PM
hmm a E6700Q the would do some matter?
roverXE
10-27-07, 06:45 PM
Game Settings: DX9 on XP, 169.01, No AA, ALL = HIGH , 1280x1024
PC: Slight Overclock (630|1942) - Top GPU Run listed
SLI
Play Time: 35.26s, Average FPS: 56.73
Min FPS: 25.82 at frame 145, Max FPS: 83.90 at frame 139
NO SLI
Play Time: 45.67s, Average FPS: 43.79
Min FPS: 25.30 at frame 161, Max FPS: 52.76 at frame 1004
technoid
10-27-07, 07:23 PM
OS: XP32 DRV: 169.01 (Full System Specs Below)
C2D: E6700, EVGA: 8800GTS, KVR: 2 GB PC2-6400, nothing over clocked.
Running CPU benchmark 1
=================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: 44.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 43.81s, Average FPS: 34.24
Min FPS: 18.20 at frame 196, Max FPS: 47.71 at frame 375
Average Tri/Sec: 35064696, Tri/Frame: 1024032
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.70
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 39.85s, Average FPS: 37.64
Min FPS: 18.20 at frame 196, Max FPS: 50.55 at frame 98
Average Tri/Sec: 38465564, Tri/Frame: 1021834
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.70
=================================================
Running GPU benchmark 1
=================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 54.05s, Average FPS: 37.00
Min FPS: 17.99 at frame 140, Max FPS: 47.65 at frame 992
Average Tri/Sec: 37818228, Tri/Frame: 1022036
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.90
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 49.03s, Average FPS: 40.79
Min FPS: 17.99 at frame 140, Max FPS: 49.72 at frame 109
Average Tri/Sec: 42132112, Tri/Frame: 1032858
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
=================================================
nutcrackr
10-27-07, 08:12 PM
1280x1024 all high, shaders med, no AA
dx10
----
CPU - 4/31/43
GPU - 16/30/41
dx9 (8xAF)
--------
CPU - 12/34/47
GPU - 12/38/53
5600+, 2900xt 512, 2gb ddr 800, Vista 32 bit
Something wonky with the min cpu score on dx10, maybe I misread it but it seemed similar to dx9
Please mention resoultion...
Here's my 2900xt for comparison
2900 xt @ 800/950, Q6600 @ 3.5ghz Vista/Directx 10
1680x1050, all settings high. No AA/AF
Both scores from the second run
GPU Bench:
Min:7.28
Max :24.89
Average: 21.32
CPU Bench:
Min: 8.85
Max:27.15
Average:20.5
All settings the same except Very High
Min: 6.22
Max:14.84
Average: 12.33
So my video card pulls 12.33 at very high 1680x1050 which is only 4fps behind the ultra! Woots haha
Can somebody with a C2D CPU (preferably running @2.66GHz :D) & stock 8800GTX run a test @1280x1024,2xAA,16xAF all High settings (DX9) in XP & report his GPU/CPU scores ? thanks.
Blacklash
10-27-07, 10:52 PM
I don't know what's up with mine under vista x64. It runs the test loops fine then drops to desktop and says "can't find specified file" in the CMD prompt when it should end with results.
Uberpwnage
10-27-07, 11:00 PM
Can somebody with a C2D CPU (preferably running @2.66GHz :D) & stock 8800GTX run a test @1280x1024,2xAA,16xAF all High settings (DX9) in XP & report his GPU/CPU scores ? thanks.
C2D @ 2.66GHz (333x8); 2x1GB DDR2 888 4-4-4-5 2T; 8800 GTX @ Stock w/ FW 169.01
1280x1024 2xAA 16xAF High Quality DX9 32 bit XP
Running GPU benchmark 1
================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 69.96s, Average FPS: 28.59
Min FPS: 19.62 at frame 157, Max FPS: 37.52 at frame 69
Average Tri/Sec: 29474080, Tri/Frame: 1030975
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.89
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 65.80s, Average FPS: 30.40
Min FPS: 19.62 at frame 157, Max FPS: 40.40 at frame 75
Average Tri/Sec: 31659056, Tri/Frame: 1041571
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.88
================================================== ============
Running CPU Benchmark 1
================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: 44.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 57.75s, Average FPS: 25.97
Min FPS: 16.01 at frame 196, Max FPS: 37.92 at frame 109
Average Tri/Sec: 26685012, Tri/Frame: 1027431
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.70
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 54.92s, Average FPS: 27.31
Min FPS: 16.01 at frame 196, Max FPS: 37.92 at frame 109
Average Tri/Sec: 28059456, Tri/Frame: 1027301
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.70
================================================== ============
C2D @ 2.66GHz (333x8); 2x1GB DDR2 888 4-4-4-5 2T; 8800 GTX @ Stock w/ FW 169.01
1280x1024 2xAA 16xAF High Quality DX9 32 bit XP
==================
Thanks Uber you rock man!! :thumbsup:
i wanted to test my "new toy" againest a stock GTX. will post my results in a jiffy ;)
AthlonXP1800
10-27-07, 11:17 PM
I don't know what's up with mine under vista x64. It runs the test loops fine then drops to desktop and says "can't find specified file" in the CMD prompt when it should end with results.
You not the only one, I have same problem on 32bit Vista, I took notes of avg and max fps in the benchmarks instead.
Ok same settings as Uber : 1280x1024,2xAA,16xAF,DX9 all High XP (gameplay semi smooth all the time)
169.01 , E6700@2.66Ghz , 8800Ultra OC (660/2300/1500)
GPU score (3rd run) : min = 20fps , av = 34fps , max = 46fps
CPU score (2nd run): min = 9fps , av = 31fps , max = 42fps
weird i have lower min but higher av & max!
Uberpwnage
10-27-07, 11:33 PM
Nice results! That MSI Ultra is a great deal, the clocks are insane for the price. It's less then most stock Ultras - at least on Newegg.
I wonder what was causing that 9fps min on the cpu benchmark though? Maybe FSB and ram speeds? Might wanna update your sig ;)
Luieburger
10-27-07, 11:54 PM
1920x1200 Vista
GPU - Average: 35.51fps Max: 43.96fps
CPU - Average: 32.99fps Max 42.21fps
Nice results! That MSI Ultra is a great deal, the clocks are insane for the price. It's less then most stock Ultras - at least on Newegg.
I wonder what was causing that 9fps min on the cpu benchmark though? Maybe FSB and ram speeds? Might wanna update your sig ;)
Yep i thought about that too. could be the bench is sensitive to to RAM speeds. will update my sig soon! :)
Sgt_Pitt
10-28-07, 12:40 AM
1680x1050 all settings high except post processing on medium
CPU TEST
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 1500, Recorded Time: 44.62s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 59.06s, Average FPS: 25.40
Min FPS: 3.32 at frame 196, Max FPS: 33.74 at frame 356
Average Tri/Sec: 29336976, Tri/Frame: 1155000
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.62
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 54.58s, Average FPS: 27.48
Min FPS: 3.32 at frame 196, Max FPS: 36.30 at frame 107
Average Tri/Sec: 31895450, Tri/Frame: 1160538
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.62
================================================== ============
Press any key to continue . . .
GPU TEST
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 77.00s, Average FPS: 25.97
Min FPS: 14.83 at frame 1947, Max FPS: 34.16 at frame 1757
Average Tri/Sec: -24563418, Tri/Frame: -945728
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.97
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 72.96s, Average FPS: 27.41
Min FPS: 14.83 at frame 1947, Max FPS: 34.34 at frame 1763
Average Tri/Sec: -25644342, Tri/Frame: -935544
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -0.98
!================================================= =============
Press any key to continue . . .
Uberpwnage
10-28-07, 12:43 AM
Just ran another bench, same 1280x1024 2xAA 16xAF, but this time @ 3.66GHz; GTX @ 621/1512/1008; 2x1GB DDR2 917 4-4-4-5 2T.
GPU 2nd run: min = 23.8; avg = 33.5; max = 44.33
CPU 2nd run: min = 19.6; avg = 30.1; max = 41.5
Interesting, a 1GHz increase in CPU w/ some GPU oc'ing is pretty equal to those Ultra scores. CPU speed doesn't do much for this game I guess. Rather unfortunate since my GTX won't go any higher :(
Sgt_Pitt
10-28-07, 12:58 AM
Changed settings to optimal and set rez to 1280x1024
GPU TEST
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 50.21s, Average FPS: 39.84
Min FPS: 21.86 at frame 1950, Max FPS: 58.46 at frame 1610
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 48.26s, Average FPS: 41.44
Min FPS: 21.59 at frame 1955, Max FPS: 60.00 at frame 1738
CPU TEST
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 50.21s, Average FPS: 39.84
Min FPS: 21.86 at frame 1950, Max FPS: 58.46 at frame 1610
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 48.26s, Average FPS: 41.44
Min FPS: 21.59 at frame 1955, Max FPS: 60.00 at frame 1738
hmm seems like i have vsync on :)
Just ran another bench, same 1280x1024 2xAA 16xAF, but this time @ 3.66GHz; GTX @ 621/1512/1008; 2x1GB DDR2 917 4-4-4-5 2T.
GPU 2nd run: min = 23.8; avg = 33.5; max = 44.33
CPU 2nd run: min = 19.6; avg = 30.1; max = 41.5
Interesting, a 1GHz increase in CPU w/ some GPU oc'ing is pretty equal to those Ultra scores. CPU speed doesn't do much for this game I guess. Rather unfortunate since my GTX won't go any higher :(
You got higher minimum in the GPU test.
slaWter
10-28-07, 07:38 AM
You got higher minimum in the GPU test.
MIN frame rate is very important, especially with this game in my opinion.
MIN frame rate is very important, especially with this game in my opinion.
That's why I'm loving my 45fps min (nana2)
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.