Crysis CPU/GPU benchmarks, post your's

[FastRedPonyCar]

GPU

XP DX9

1680X1050

All high settings w/very high ini tweaks

afg fps 33.62
Min fps 20.47 @ frame 137
Max fps 53.98@ frame 987

CPU

avg fps 34.24
min fps 14.47 @ frame 196
max fps 53.55 @ frame 175

[T.h.o.m.a.s.]

everything on high
and stock speeds , q6600 and GTX sli
@1280*1024

cpu average 42 fps
gpu average 45 fps

[madmossy]

Crysis doesnt appear to be using quad core at all.

Tested by setting CPU affinity to 1, 2 or 4 cores and it made no difference to frame rates.

[T.h.o.m.a.s.]

there is also a huge perfomance hit between dx9 and dx10

in vista i got at high settings 1280*1024

21 for cpu and
22 on gpu
when i took very high settings

it was only 9 for cpu and 12 for gpu

every thing on stock settings

i also have a e6600 in another computer , i will use that to test between 2 or 4 cores but as you said i wont expect much difference either .

[rHy0]

How the hell do I run them!? They are just text files!

[agentkay]

How the hell do I run them!? They are just text files!

They are ".bat" files, and you can launch 'em with a doubleclick.

[rHy0]

They are ".bat" files, and you can launch 'em with a doubleclick.
Not with me... Only .cfg files..... ?????

[Uberpwnage]

Well either way, Crysis inspired me to try oc'ing my cpu some more, and I have an extra 100MHz so far :D

[jeffmd]

this post is now ruined by people saying they tweaked and not listing them. whats the point? it only tells us you achived a number by making the game look worse. what good is that?

[SH64]

MIN frame rate is very important, especially with this game in my opinion.
Indeed & i believe the CPU plays a role on this.

[Destroy]

Crysis doesnt appear to be using quad core at all.

Tested by setting CPU affinity to 1, 2 or 4 cores and it made no difference to frame rates.

Yes, it seems this game is VERY GPU limited.

[SH64]

Crysis doesnt appear to be using quad core at all.

Tested by setting CPU affinity to 1, 2 or 4 cores and it made no difference to frame rates.
Thats too bad! i bought a Quad-core in hope to see big difference in this game.
unless there's a multi-core patch in the works!

[avirox]

8800 GTS 320 (600/1900), E6600 @ 2.4ghz, 2gb ram; All settings @ Med, but textures on high:

GPU: 20 - 46 - 63

Very acceptable. Didn't think my 320 would hold out this well but it does :)

[agentkay]

Not with me... Only .cfg files..... ?????

Strange here is the screenshot of that folder:

http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/5142/mozscreenshot3wy1.jpg

The game does use quad cores but core 3 and 4 don't get maxed out. It would be nice to test what "needs" to be done until they are maxed out, like creating 4 tornadoes that move over 100 "physic trees" and see what happens regarding CPU load. I suspect each core is bound to a specific thread, AI, physics might simply not cause a huge load in Crysis until you increase the number significantly.

[SH64]

The game does use quad cores but core 3 and 4 don't get maxed out. It would be nice to test what "needs" to be done until they are maxed out, like creating 4 tornadoes that move over 100 "physic trees" and see what happens regarding CPU load. I suspect each core is bound to a specific thread, AI, physics might simply not cause a huge load in Crysis until you increase the number significantly.
I intend to play the demo on the C2D for sometime & then move to the C2Q to see if there's any real difference.
sometimes i get stuttering with explosions or entering next areas in the map. i wonder if the 4 cores would be of any help with that.

[FastRedPonyCar]

Well, this seems to be helpful info!!

Benchmarking:
Crysis came with two benchmarks to test and compare your performance. A GPU benchmark and a CPU benchmark stressing physics. They can be found in the Bin32 or Bin64 folders. Just double click on them to start. The game will run through 4 loops of the benchmark. When it's done it will show you the results, I suggest you ignore the first one since it was just caching the level and assets on the first run. You can make your own benchmarks but for now these two work well as standard tests.

Source: http://www.incrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11614

[zerobeta]

XP 32bit after fresh install

Q6600, 8800GTS 512MB, 1 x 2GB 800MHz Dual Channel
Nothing is overclocked

1680 x 1050, All graphic settings set to high, with a bit of tweaking from a config someone posted, sunshafts and such, probebly doesn't matter much for the benchmark.

169.06

CPU min 17.2, ave 27.3, max 37.6
GPU min 21.8, ave 29.3, max 33.1

Is that considered good :p

[3DBrad]

Nothing runs Crysis good, not even $1200+ of GPUs. :D

[Revs]

Crysis 64bit, DX10, all high settings, no tweaks, no AA, 1680 x 1050, GPU test:

Min: 18.64 FPS
Avg: 33.91 FPS
Max: 57.13 FPS

Results on the last of the four runs

Crysis 64bit, DX10, all very high settings, no tweaks, no AA, 1680 x 1050, GPU test:

Min: 20.11 FPS
Avg: 34.02 FPS
Max: 57.51 FPS

Strange results with very high settings. It was running alot slower than it says here. The first test seemed about right though.

[SH64]

GPU benchmark , DX10 , All very high , Vista 32-bit , 1280x1024 , noAA (green rig)

Min = 19fps
Av = 32fps

game is now very playable at these settings :thumbsup:

[Eltigre88]

Well here is what I got an avaerage o 28 FPS with the below settings.

Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.665
Run #2- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Last Average FPS: 16.44

Very high results

[SH64]

You dont have to post every single detail .. just what matters to the reader.

[Eltigre88]

Well here is what I got an avaerage o 28 FPS with the below settings.

Run #1- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 28.665
Run #2- DX10 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Last Average FPS: 16.44

Very high results

Better

[Eltigre88]

Crysis 64bit, DX10, all high settings, no tweaks, no AA, 1680 x 1050, GPU test:

Min: 18.64 FPS
Avg: 33.91 FPS
Max: 57.13 FPS

Results on the last of the four runs

Crysis 64bit, DX10, all very high settings, no tweaks, no AA, 1680 x 1050, GPU test:

Min: 20.11 FPS
Avg: 34.02 FPS
Max: 57.51 FPS

Strange results with very high settings. It was running alot slower than it says here. The first test seemed about right though.

If you don't clear the first test it will rerun it and then the one you added.

[SH64]

Hmm looks about right .. (probably a little slower than usual)