PDA

View Full Version : Crysis CPU/GPU benchmarks, post your's

Pages : [1] 2 3 4
shabby
10-26-07, 10:04 PM
Included in the /Bin32 directory is a cpu/gpu benchmark, each benchmark runs 4 loops and reports your numbers at the end. So lets see how it runs on everyone rig, i'll start, specs are in my sig.

1680x1050 res, everything med detail, no AA/AF, ran in xp
GPU - 15min / 30avg / 42max
CPU - 20min / 28avg / 33max

Definetly playable, but could be better.
Destroy
10-26-07, 10:57 PM
Umm...how do you run the benchmark?

Edit: NM. I see you just have to double click the different .bat files to start the timedemo benchmark.
rudedog
10-27-07, 12:46 AM
Nice, will run some tests in the am, need to get some sleep!
AthlonXP1800
10-27-07, 12:49 AM
OMG Crysis seriously need Quad core, it seemed my Athlon 64 x2 4400+ are CPU limited with very high graphics settings.

GPU - AVG 25 MAX 34 1024x768 0xAA All graphics options Very High
CPU - AVG 22 MAX 33 1024x768 0xAA All graphics options Very High

GPU - AVG 20 MAX 24 1024x768 16xAA All graphics options Very High
CPU - AVG 19 MAX 24 1024x768 16xAA All graphics options Very High

GPU - AVG 31 MAX 44 1024x768 0xAA All graphics options High
CPU - AVG 27 MAX 39 1024x768 0xAA All graphics options High

GPU - AVG 29 MAX 41 1024x768 16xAA All graphics options High
CPU - AVG 27 MAX 40 1024x768 16xAA All graphics options High

GPU - AVG 38 MAX 53 1024x768 0xAA All graphics options Medium
CPU - AVG 34 MAX 50 1024x768 0xAA All graphics options Medium

GPU - AVG 38 MAX 52 1024x768 16xAA All graphics options Medium
CPU - AVG 32 MAX 49 1024x768 16xAA All graphics options Medium
abtomat74
10-27-07, 01:11 AM
CPU 9.57 - 19.2 - 23.64
GPU 12.72 - 23.21 - 28.28

edited to add GPU results, didn't notice the test the first time

1280x1024
4xAA
16xAF (control panel)
Supersampling
all settings HIGH, Shadows Medium
.
.
.
X2 4800+ @2.4GHz
2x1024 pc3200
8800GTS 640MB
Vista x86
Kain
10-27-07, 03:29 AM
Running on my bro's HP Pavilion dv6000 laptop with an Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0GHz, 2GB RAM, NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 with 128MB dedicated RAM, and Windows XP Home Edition.

800 x 600 with everything on Low I got an average FPS of 15 in GPU test. :p
SlieTheSecond
10-27-07, 03:36 AM
E6400 @ 3.2Ghz / 8800 GTS 640 @ 620/900 / 2 GB Ram / WinXP
All settings High, no AA. 1680x1050 res:

CPU:
Play Time: 57.86s, Average FPS: 25.93
Min FPS: 16.41 at frame 1083, Max FPS: 36.51 at frame 175
GPU:
Play Time: 76.03s, Average FPS: 26.31
Min FPS: 18.73 at frame 156, Max FPS: 30.25 at frame 994

Second Loop.
joesaiditstrue
10-27-07, 04:30 AM
Q6600 @ 3.2 / 8800 GTX @ 650/1025 + 169.01 / 4GB DDR2-800 / Vista Ultimate x64
1440x900, Shaders: High, PP+Textures+Objects+Physics: Very High, everything else Medium, 0xAA, 16xAF

Play Time: 66.86s, Average FPS: 29.91
Min FPS: 17.87 at frame 142, Max FPS: 45.23 at frame 68
Average Tri/Sec: -25800344, Tri/Frame: -862466
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.06

Q6600 @ 3.2 / 8800 GTX @ 650/1025 + 169.01 / 4GB DDR2-800 / Vista Ultimate x64
1440x900, All Settings: Very High, 0xAA, 16xAF

Play Time: 122.88s, Average FPS: 16.28
Min FPS: 12.49 at frame 1957, Max FPS: 20.64 at frame 864
Average Tri/Sec: -8305725, Tri/Frame: -510300
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.80
Airbrushkid
10-27-07, 04:40 AM
I got with no AA and using 1280x960 and all settings on high. And under XP. On Vista it crashes.

CPU -- Min fps 17.52 Average fps 29.94 Max fps 40.49

GPU -- Min fps 9.07 Average fps 30.83 Max fps 39.36
Nkd
10-27-07, 05:02 AM
everything on high no AA 1680x1050, 8800 ultra running at 702/1786/2350

gpu min 23.29, avg 39.61, max 46.98

cpu min 24, avg 37.66, max 49.20

cpu running at 3.5, q6600

avg at 1920x1200 is 32 after running the benchmark 4 times, min was 20

cpu average is probably more. or close to 32
joesaiditstrue
10-27-07, 05:51 AM
everything on high no AA 1680x1050, 8800 ultra running at 702/1786/2350

gpu min 23.29, avg 39.61, max 46.98

cpu min 24, avg 37.66, max 49.20

cpu running at 3.5, q6600

avg at 1920x1200 is 32 after running the benchmark 4 times, min was 20

cpu average is probably more. or close to 32

what OS & drivers?
Nkd
10-27-07, 05:54 AM
169.01 drivers, windows xp 32bit. quad core at 3.5, 8800 ultra at 702/1786/2350
ASUSEN7900GTX
10-27-07, 05:55 AM
INtel C2D E6600@ 2,4GHZ
8800GTS640mb@stock speeds
2gig Ram
XP home edition

CPU
Playtime 71,49s


min 9,47
Average 20.98,
max 29,61
that was Run 1 not much separates teh other ones

GPU

min 8.81
average 24,32
max 30,92

16xAA in Nhancer if game settings apply to the benchies
then all on HIgh
16XQAA
1280x1024
joesaiditstrue
10-27-07, 05:58 AM
169.01 drivers, windows xp 32bit. quad core at 3.5, 8800 ultra at 702/1786/2350

i was going to guess windows XP (DX9) but i wanted to make sure before looking like a moron :)

in DX9 my framerates on all high settings are awesome (30-40+) but switching to DX10 mode severely cripples framerates

DX9 + High settings = awesome frames, perfectly playable
DX10 + High settings = sub-30fps, not quite enjoyable, even though it looks for the most part exactly the same
Vik1dk
10-27-07, 08:56 AM
Xp64, CP default settings, no AA and ingame settings high, 1280x1024.
GTS 640 @ 615/1588/1950

163.76(low-avg-max)
CPU: 14.23-31.48-41.99
GPU: 20.84-34.14-40.63

169.01
CPU: 10.42-32.77-44.95
GPU: 23.75-35.64-42.31
Despotes
10-27-07, 09:04 AM
XP Everything on High AA2X 1920X1200 163.71

CPU
Min 11.12 Max 26.76 Avg 19.73
GPU
Min 16.06 Max 24.84 Avg 20.88
Destroy
10-27-07, 11:04 AM
Xp64, CP default settings, no AA and ingame settings high, 1280x1024.
GTS 640 @ 615/1588/1950

163.76(low-avg-max)
CPU: 14.23-31.48-41.99
GPU: 20.84-34.14-40.63

169.01
CPU: 10.42-32.77-44.95
GPU: 23.75-35.64-42.31

So the new released drivers are slower? WTF? :thumbdwn:
agentkay
10-27-07, 11:36 AM
So the new released drivers are slower? WTF? :thumbdwn:

I actually played the demo with 163.76 last night. If thats true, I just installed the slower driver (169.01). :headexplode:
Vik1dk
10-27-07, 12:01 PM
So the new released drivers are slower? WTF? :thumbdwn:
Only CPU minimum is slower and i ran the bench twice, i dont why that one is slower.
GitDat
10-27-07, 12:19 PM
Anyone turn 8xAF/16xAF and get white trees off in the distance? :|
rflair
10-27-07, 01:16 PM
Anyone turn 8xAF/16xAF and get white trees off in the distance? :|


On other forums this seems to be caused by to high an overclock on the video card.

This game demo and ATI's Whiteout demo are my new graphics stabilty tests, I've seen nothing else hit this hard.
Gaco
10-27-07, 01:38 PM
Xp64, CP default settings, no AA and ingame settings high, 1280x1024.
GTS 640 @ 615/1588/1950

163.76(low-avg-max)
CPU: 14.23-31.48-41.99
GPU: 20.84-34.14-40.63

169.01
CPU: 10.42-32.77-44.95
GPU: 23.75-35.64-42.31
So the new released drivers are slower? WTF? :thumbdwn:
Look at the numbers again. Only minimum FPS on the CPU tests, all the other min-avg-max FPS were faster on both CPU and GPU with 169.01.
lunix
10-27-07, 01:38 PM
Very playable:

GPU:
Play Time: 47.13s, Average FPS: 42.43
Min FPS: 21.45 at frame 158, Max FPS: 54.93 at frame 108
Average Tri/Sec: 44889332, Tri/Frame: 1057860
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.87

CPU:
Play Time: 38.99s, Average FPS: 38.47
Min FPS: 18.27 at frame 196, Max FPS: 47.45 at frame 95
Average Tri/Sec: 40408720, Tri/Frame: 1050485
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.68

Everything on High with tweaks XP 32bit
* Removed motion blur
* Set max shadow size to 512

1280x960 No AA or AF

C2D @ 3Ghz 8800GTS 320 @ 600/2000 with 1510 shaders
Destroy
10-27-07, 01:49 PM
Look at the numbers again. Only minimum FPS on the CPU tests, all the other min-avg-max FPS were faster on both CPU and GPU with 169.01.

I was reading all backwards or something.
GitDat
10-27-07, 02:30 PM
Vista 64 - DX10
1280x1024, No AA/AF, everything Medium except Textures:Very High & Water: Very High

CPU
Min FPS: 45.37 , Max FPS: 80.67

GPU
Min FPS: 46.57 , Max FPS: 89.36