View Full Version : how would a 8800GT 700mhz core compare to a 8800GTX Stock?
Apollo 13
10-31-07, 01:55 PM
are there any benchmarks that compare overclocked 8800GT to 8800GTX? I'm looking at a 700mhz core clock compared to a stock 8800GTX.
Here is one :)
http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/hardware/1728_11.html
EDIT:
Whoops they only compare to an Ultra.
Apollo 13
10-31-07, 02:23 PM
Here is one :)
http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/hardware/1728_11.html
EDIT:
Whoops they only compare to an Ultra.
close enough
methimpikehoses
10-31-07, 03:53 PM
Here is one :)
http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/hardware/1728_11.html
EDIT:
Whoops they only compare to an Ultra.
I wish they did 1920x1200. I might get one of those SSCs.
GT vs Ultra?
200 Points below the ultra is a little... strange.
I mean, the Ultra is a monster. It can handle almost every game with HQ settings all the way.
Is the GT really THAT good? I mean I ordered one and I'm really impressed already, but somehow this GT-Ultra comparsion seems a little fishy...
Armed_Baboon
10-31-07, 06:13 PM
that's gotta be wrong. maybe those GTs and GTSs are in SLI?
Uberpwnage
10-31-07, 06:15 PM
Bioshock 1680x1050 DX10 takes a big hit, 96fps on the Ultra and 48fps on the GT. That seems way too big of a difference, maybe it's a driver issue with 167.26. Also the clocks are pretty high, I wouldn't expect to get much more than 720MHz on the GT core, and the Ultra is at stock.
Ya really odd. The GT is kicking ass all the way then the Bioshock numbers are totally off compared to the rest.
Bioshock 1680x1050 DX10 takes a big hit, 96fps on the Ultra and 48fps on the GT. That seems way too big of a difference, maybe it's a driver issue with 167.26. Also the clocks are pretty high, I wouldn't expect to get much more than 720MHz on the GT core, and the Ultra is at stock.
that review is so out of this world, the dude must have messed up when he entered the numbers, I bet he entered wrong numbers for wrong cards.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.