can someone with a 8800GT and Crysis demo plz...

[Apollo 13]

can you run the GPU benchmark in DX10 mode no AA; with everything on very high except for shaders at high on 1024x768 rez plz? Then again at 1280x1024 and posts the results plz.

[six_storm]

I did a quick comparison to my 8800GT today with this:

DX10 1024x768 No AA/AF All Very High Settings
AVG FPS = 60FPS

Once I changed the res to 1366x768, it dropped down to about 30FPS on average. But I did not play through the entire demo. My card is having some heat issues so I'm trying to get them taken care of first.

EDIT - I'm sofa king we todd ed. :D

[Gaco]

I did a quick comparison to my 8600GT today with this:

DX10 1024x768 No AA/AF All Very High Settings
AVG FPS = 60FPS

Once I changed the res to 1366x768, it dropped down to about 30FPS on average. But I did not play through the entire demo. My card is having some heat issues so I'm trying to get them taken care of first.
When did you get a GT? :D I thought they were so new that they were barely available :)

[Ambrose]

I did a quick comparison to my 8600GT today with this:

DX10 1024x768 No AA/AF All Very High Settings
AVG FPS = 60FPS

Once I changed the res to 1366x768, it dropped down to about 30FPS on average. But I did not play through the entire demo. My card is having some heat issues so I'm trying to get them taken care of first.

I'm gonna have to call bull*****.

I just ran the GPU benchmark at those settings and came up with the following (this is with shaders at High too):

Min fps: 25.14
Avg fps: 47.46
Max fps: 58.98

Unless you overclocked the hell out of that card, there's no way you beat my GTX by THAT much...:cool:

[Apollo 13]

I'm gonna have to call bull*****.

I just ran the GPU benchmark at those settings and came up with the following (this is with shaders at High too):

Min fps: 25.14
Avg fps: 47.46
Max fps: 58.98

Unless you overclocked the hell out of that card, there's no way you beat my GTX by THAT much...:cool:

same here but your max FPS seems off since I get a max of 73FPS.

[Crow_Nest]

I did a quick comparison to my 8600GT today with this:

DX10 1024x768 No AA/AF All Very High Settings
AVG FPS = 60FPS

Once I changed the res to 1366x768, it dropped down to about 30FPS on average. But I did not play through the entire demo. My card is having some heat issues so I'm trying to get them taken care of first.

How the hell can you average 60 FPS on a 8600GT at very high settings? My overclocked 7900GT couldnt even hit 60 FPS at medium settings, no AA/AF @ 1024x768 unless im looking at the sky.

[Ambrose]

How the hell can you average 60 FPS on a 8600GT at very high settings? My overclocked 7900GT couldnt even hit 60 FPS at medium settings, no AA/AF @ 1024x768 unless im looking at the sky.

Well I think that he meant that he was comparing his 8800GT (which is listed in his sig) to his previous card (8600GT?).

But still, every benchmark I've read so far has the 8800GT lagging the GTX by 5-10 fps... so what gives?

[john19055]

I had my Q6600 at default of 2.4gigs and the memory was set at 533
and running with everthing set to high settings and no FSAA and
running it at 1360x768

CPU _____________ GPU
min-22.68___________ min-15.75
avg-41.82___________ avg-39.15
max-54.15___________ max-64.65

and running at 1920x1200 with no FSAA and the same default Q6600 at 2.4g
CPU____________ GPU
min-20.50__________ min-14.76
avg-35.15__________avg-35.55
max-50.25__________max-45.25

So I don't get that big of a difference ,if I run it at a lower resolution or running it at a high resolution,but it looks a lot better at 1920 x 1200.This is windows XP

[Apollo 13]

I had my Q6600 at default of 2.4gigs and the memory was set at 533
and running with everthing set to high settings and no FSAA and
running it at 1360x768

CPU _____________ GPU
min-22.68___________ min-15.75
avg-41.82___________ avg-39.15
max-54.15___________ max-64.65

and running at 1920x1200 with no FSAA and the same default Q6600 at 2.4g
CPU____________ GPU
min-20.50__________ min-14.76
avg-35.15__________avg-35.55
max-50.25__________max-45.25

So I don't get that big of a difference ,if I run it at a lower resolution or running it at a high resolution,but it looks a lot better at 1920 x 1200.This is windows XP

Do you have Vista? if so can you run it at the settings I posted plz?

[six_storm]

My bad guys, I'm just retarded. :D Anywho, I'll run some more benchies tomorrow morning (hanging with the fiancee tonight) and give you better results. But from what I remember, DX10, very high on all, 1024x768 - it was 50 or 60 something on AVG. Not sure exactly what number it was.

Yes, I did get a 8800GT yesterday and I will be reviewing it for NVNews. Gotta run some tests this weekend and then wait for CoD4 next week. :D

[Apollo 13]

My bad guys, I'm just retarded. :D Anywho, I'll run some more benchies tomorrow morning (hanging with the fiancee tonight) and give you better results. But from what I remember, DX10, very high on all, 1024x768 - it was 50 or 60 something on AVG. Not sure exactly what number it was.

Yes, I did get a 8800GT yesterday and I will be reviewing it for NVNews. Gotta run some tests this weekend and then wait for CoD4 next week. :D



well when you get time can you posts results with the settings I posted plz?

[six_storm]

well when you get time can you posts results with the settings I posted plz?

Yes, tomorrow morning I will have enough time to give you better results.

[Apollo 13]

bump

[six_storm]

I just play through the demo in DX10 at 1366x768 with everything very high.

AVG FPS = 25FPS

With shaders on high, I got 40FPS on AVG.

I haven't tried 1024x768 yet but I'm sure it'll be a little higher than what I got.

[sammy sung]

You happy with the card sofar then six_storm ?

[six_storm]

You happy with the card sofar then six_storm ?

Oh yeah. The only problem is that with the settings mentioned above, when you get into a "cinematic short", the frame rate goes down to 10FPS! That's not good.