colins
04-14-03, 07:39 PM
I'm running a Quadro4 750 XGL on a 3.06Ghz Xeon based HP XW6000 workstation. The chipset is Intel's E7505, and I'm running RedHat 7.2.
The 4349 driver readme doesn't mention nvagp support for the E7505. But 'cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status reveals that nvagp is being used and I'm running in 4X mode with SBA and Fast Writes disabled.
I have not patched my kernel, so the E7505 works but is basically not detected as an E7505. I'm not surprised SBA and Fast Writes are off by default. But what about the nvagp support? Is there native support for the E7205/E7505 and it's just not documented or maybe I missed it?
My performance seems decent and the stability is solid. I'm running Twinview, with a combined 2560x1024 display @ 32bit and glxgears gives around 4000 fps at the default window size without any performance options turned on in XF86Config (like page/window flipping or any other tweaks).
Can anyone clear up the E7505 issue for me? Would I get better performance if I tried the E7205/E7505 patch (I believe it only works with 2.4.20-pre9 at the moment?) and compiled agpgart? Or am I already seeing the full performance of this combination (it feels very fast compared to our Sun Blade 2000s with Expert3D cards).
Thanks,
colins
The 4349 driver readme doesn't mention nvagp support for the E7505. But 'cat /proc/driver/nvidia/agp/status reveals that nvagp is being used and I'm running in 4X mode with SBA and Fast Writes disabled.
I have not patched my kernel, so the E7505 works but is basically not detected as an E7505. I'm not surprised SBA and Fast Writes are off by default. But what about the nvagp support? Is there native support for the E7205/E7505 and it's just not documented or maybe I missed it?
My performance seems decent and the stability is solid. I'm running Twinview, with a combined 2560x1024 display @ 32bit and glxgears gives around 4000 fps at the default window size without any performance options turned on in XF86Config (like page/window flipping or any other tweaks).
Can anyone clear up the E7505 issue for me? Would I get better performance if I tried the E7205/E7505 patch (I believe it only works with 2.4.20-pre9 at the moment?) and compiled agpgart? Or am I already seeing the full performance of this combination (it feels very fast compared to our Sun Blade 2000s with Expert3D cards).
Thanks,
colins