View Full Version : Forceware 169.28 Beta Feedback Thread - Vista Only!
breathemetal
12-28-07, 12:53 PM
are u running 32 or 64 bit?
nekrosoft13
12-28-07, 12:55 PM
128bit vista supreme
breathemetal
12-28-07, 12:58 PM
HOLY ****! WOW!
-_-
Now seriously.
nekrosoft13
12-28-07, 01:12 PM
64bit of course
breathemetal
12-28-07, 01:12 PM
Alright awesome, well it looks like ill install these then
breathemetal
12-28-07, 01:19 PM
well i just up'd to these and aero is gone!
lduguay
12-28-07, 01:35 PM
You should have installed it on 128 bit Vista Supreme like nekrosoft said..
:)
breathemetal
12-28-07, 01:36 PM
I went back to the .25 and everythings alright now
Bokishi
12-28-07, 02:05 PM
I can only get AA working if forced globally with these. Well at least it works
I don't think im gonna install these, I might do the whql, but not interested in beta drivers...
PTK1982
01-03-08, 12:06 AM
I don't think im gonna install these, I might do the whql, but not interested in beta drivers...
If 169.28 gets WHQL certification it is still SAME driver than before. Only difference is that you don't have to click in installation "are you sure you want install these drivers are really sure you want to install..." that red jargon you get when driver isn't WHQL certified.
WHQL certified is just M$ digital signature (nvidia pays big $ to M$ so they get that signature).
Good example was 163 series drivers they did get WHQL certivication but where unusable because constant driver crashes in IE7 (nvlddmkm errors).
So long story to short WHQL dosen't mean a ****.
If 169.28 gets WHQL certification it is still SAME driver than before. Only difference is that you don't have to click in installation "are you sure you want install these drivers are really sure you want to install..." that red jargon you get when driver isn't WHQL certified.
WHQL certified is just M$ digital signature (nvidia pays big $ to M$ so they get that signature).
Good example was 163 series drivers they did get WHQL certivication but where unusable because constant driver crashes in IE7 (nvlddmkm errors).
So long story to short WHQL dosen't mean a ****.
Point well taken my friend, anyway I thought that these drivers were for et:qw.... Don't own it so ill wait for the next ones.
ikjadoon
01-08-08, 09:06 PM
If 169.28 gets WHQL certification it is still SAME driver than before. Only difference is that you don't have to click in installation "are you sure you want install these drivers are really sure you want to install..." that red jargon you get when driver isn't WHQL certified.
WHQL certified is just M$ digital signature (nvidia pays big $ to M$ so they get that signature).
Good example was 163 series drivers they did get WHQL certivication but where unusable because constant driver crashes in IE7 (nvlddmkm errors).
So long story to short WHQL dosen't mean a ****.
But don't some BETA drivers get skipped over in WHQL-certification? Couldn't this quite possibly be one of those?
I completely agree with you that it means very little, minus a feel-good feeling.
~Ibrahim~
Great, need to try these drivers :)
Ut was crashing like if for some reason it was out of memory with slowdowns and gave me the old back to desktop crash a few times so i hope these drivers solve that problem. ;)
Bokishi
01-10-08, 05:59 PM
UT3 drivers my ass, I get occasional BSODS in warfare with these
tweaked
02-27-08, 10:52 PM
these fix Frontlines:Fuel of War.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.