View Full Version : New Patch 1.2 information from crytek!
COJ is DX9 lol and it runs well and the game will still run well after crysis i tell you not even online . oh wait have not said online yet of crysis . better not
Ummm, COJ is DX9 and DX10.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL6ug-XNfL4
Ummm, COJ is DX9 and DX10.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JL6ug-XNfL4
i have no trouble running that in dx10
Dual Core Joe
02-03-08, 11:56 PM
Ive had so much trouble with Patch 1.1 I wont be installing 1.2 that's for sure.
nekrosoft13
02-04-08, 07:16 AM
COJ was a trashy example of DX10 that ran like poo.
If you want a good example of DX10 besides Crysis, go play Lost Planet, it actually improves performance in DX10 when you have the same settings set as DX9.
well, difference between COJ DX10 and Lost Planet is big.
COJ DX10 improoves image quality by quite a big margin, and it actually runs not bad, 1680x1050, all max in game, 8x AA.
Lost Planet DX10 with all extra image quality settings on, has lower performance then DX9 mode, if you run DX10 in same settings as DX9, then performance will be slightly higher.
http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5511&Itemid=1
lol . there should be an award for bugs and bad coding they would win that as well. just beating bf2142
I really don't have any issues with it. It scales 100% for me with SLI and never crashes. Guess i've just been lucky.
Damn you Murphys law :( . Ever since typing this post i've not been able to run Crysis in 64bit mode. It won't even load.
Reinstalled SP1 RC and all is well :o Must have been missing an update. WTF is the point in Windows Update if it doesn't install all the updates?!? Or at least give you the option to.
well, difference between COJ DX10 and Lost Planet is big.
COJ DX10 improoves image quality by quite a big margin, and it actually runs not bad, 1680x1050, all max in game, 8x AA.
Lost Planet DX10 with all extra image quality settings on, has lower performance then DX9 mode, if you run DX10 in same settings as DX9, then performance will be slightly higher.
The motion blur and fur shader in Lost Planet/DX10 is simply awesome. :)
As for the people complaining about performance, well, Crytek could have made a game with little levels, just a few alpha-plane plants, and plastic-looking people, but then you'd complain about cheesy 2004-ish graphics.
However, Crytek once again broke all records in regards to graphics, spent years and millions of dollar making this game, and you complain because it won't run good on your hardware THAT'S FROM 2006! Nvidia hasn't released a new highend since '06 (the Ultra is a refresh), and Crysis is bleeding-edge technology.
nekrosoft13
02-04-08, 12:38 PM
However, Crytek once again broke all records in regards to graphics, spent years and millions of dollar making this game, and you complain because it won't run good on your hardware THAT'S FROM 2006! Nvidia hasn't released a new highend since '06 (the Ultra is a refresh), and Crysis is bleeding-edge technology.
i'm very happy with crysis performance. for the ammount of detail, peformance is great.
Yeah, and I was surprised to see it runs better than UT3 on my 8400m in my laptop! :)
The last statement wasn't directed toward you, only the first part about Lost Planet, btw, so hopefully you didn't think I was saying you were complaining about performance. :)
:D
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.