Nvidia GT200 scored 16.6K in 3DMark06 2560x1600 test

[MUYA]

I dunno if this has been posted...

http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=242644

[Madpistol]

Good.... Lets get it on shelves so we can have a proper successor to the G80. :D

[ViN86]

bunch of the people say it's fake. say the CPU score is too high and you can see a 4 on the left, probably from a 1280x1024 res.

[MUYA]

:( Spoil sport!! if fake that is :(

[MUYA]

Maybe the res is default 1280 by 1024? :)

I would be happy with that for alpha score :)

[ViN86]

Maybe the res is default 1280 by 1024? :)

I would be happy with that for alpha score :)
oh yea i agree, 16.6k is good for a single alpha card :D

[amk21]

It's a fake

[RaidenWoW]

bunch of the people say it's fake. say the CPU score is too high and you can see a 4 on the left, probably from a 1280x1024 res.


CPU score being too high?

I don't think so.... My Q6600 gets around those scores.

[SH64]

512MB eh?

[H3avyM3tal]

They say in the first post that they ran two of them Q6600 on a new nvidia chipset.

[nekrosoft13]

could be real, that newzhunter guy usually is reliable

[Goran]

could be real, that newzhunter guy usually is reliable

It's not newzhunter who posted this in the first place. It's a "she"? over at Annandtech that left the site after posting this breaking "news" :)

And why hide the resolution info window? If they said that it was on alpha hardware/drivers in res of 1024 I'd buy it, but this.. naah!

Not so trusty me thinks , hehe

[MUYA]

http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/GeForce_9800_GX2%2C_9800_GTX_%26_3870_X2_Compared/5614.html

[Madpistol]

http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/GeForce_9800_GX2%2C_9800_GTX_%26_3870_X2_Compared/5614.html

The 9800 GTX just doesn't look that powerful. :(

[walterman]

I think it's fake too, but, that's the sort of score that we would like to see.

[rhink]

Problem is we're once again at hte point where we're mostly constrained by memory bandwidth, which is going to linearly constrain performance. A new architecture might change that, but these are still G80 derivatives. That might be why we haven't seen a new high end really since the 8800 GTX/Ultra.... no point unless we can dig up a heap of i/o performance from somewhere... and that, I believe, more than anything is what's pushing us back around towards GX2 type solutions.

[ViN86]

CPU score being too high?

I don't think so.... My Q6600 gets around those scores.
dont kill the messenger. i just repeated what people were saying on those forums.

[Revs]

http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/GeForce_9800_GX2%2C_9800_GTX_%26_3870_X2_Compared/5614.html

I thought ATI's X2 had a much higher score than that. I'm sure in another thread it showed it with something like 17k points at a higher res!?!

I'm still very aprihensive about anything that's being said about the upcoming GTX too.

Is this GT200 GPU gonna be released on 10 series cards?

[Atomizer]

Why would they edit out anything in screenshots apart from perhaps registration information(names etc), that alone pretty much suggests the entire thing is fake, ill just wait for a reliable benchmark.

If they have anything to hide, then they cant be trusted.

[dxx]

Why would they edit out anything in screenshots apart from perhaps registration information(names etc), that alone pretty much suggests the entire thing is fake, ill just wait for a reliable benchmark.

If they have anything to hide, then they cant be trusted.

You're looking at it from the wrong perspective. The BIOS serial that they're hiding isn't being specifically hidden from us, but from nVidia. This'll be done so that whoever made the benchmark can't be tracked down and sued for breach of the NDA they'd have had to sign in order to get hold of the hardware. The rest, well, you're right, in that it is just bull.

[killahsin]

i dunno all her past predictions have come true. all of them. sooo...

[slaWter]

From that VR-Zone post:
The are two Q6600 (LGA 775) processers on a twin socket motherboad on a new nvidia chipset.

yeah right :p