GT200 not much faster then 9800GX2

[eXeraZoR]

I think this is not really true but here it is_

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/06/12/gt200-scores-revealed

NVIDIA will maybe lower price of GT200
http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7853.html

[zer0]

inquirer.net = inqfail.net

[CAUTION]

inquirer.net = inqfail.net

I totally agree

[Toss3]

You know I still consider that to be an achievement! The 9800gx2 consists of two cards, not one, so the 280 GTX provides double the speed of a single 9800Gtx! This is also without the shortcomings of multi gpu technology! The 280GTX will also be much faster when it comes down to high resolutions with AA due to increased bandwidth. The 280GTX will in other words crush the 9800Gx2.. :cool:

[fivefeet8]

You know I still consider that to be an achievement! The 9800gx2 consists of two cards, not one, so the 280 GTX provides double the speed of a single 9800Gtx! This is also without the shortcomings of multi gpu technology! The 280GTX will also be much faster when it comes down to high resolutions with AA due to increased bandwidth. The 280GTX will in other words crush the 9800Gx2.. :cool:

Watch what happens when Crysis is set to VH. ;)

[CAUTION]

3-way SLI GTX 280 Scores P21350 In 3DMark Vantage

http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=287887

[Uberpwnage]

Those 1920x1200 numbers on Crysis "High" are wrong, I get close to 50fps on the same settings.

[Runningman]

3-way SLI GTX 280 Scores P21350 In 3DMark Vantage

http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=287887speaking of tri sli, i often wonder why sli and tri-sli scales better then quad-sli, i wonder if the bridgechip is the bottleneck and is holding back perfiormance?

[J-Mag]

The INQ has always leaned towards ATI, haven't they?

[Uberpwnage]

The INQ has always leaned towards ATI, haven't they?
Atleast since the 7900/X1900 generation, that's when I started checking their page for news. I've since stopped with this latest round of :bs: