View Full Version : Official GeForce GTX 280 and GTX 260 reviews thread!
Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
[
7]
8
9
10
11
nekrosoft13
06-18-08, 08:24 AM
2x 4850 = GTX 280 KILLER
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/showthread.php?t=500923
i really hope so, nvidia better drop the price in few days
:drooling:
Man we really need SLI on Intel boards!!
Skulltrail Anyone?
http://www.abload.de/img/crysis4xaaql2.jpg
Is that about what a single GTX280 gets ?
That's about what a single 280 gets with no AA at that resolution.
pizzaguy
06-18-08, 08:43 AM
There's nothing wrong with 35fps in Crysis.
It is when the GPU cost you a cool $650
pizzaguy
06-18-08, 08:44 AM
When I decided that 25fps looked good in Crysis on my system it wasn't because "that's all everybody [else] is getting." It was because it actually looked good.
nm
pizzaguy
06-18-08, 09:08 AM
nm
Is that about what a single GTX280 gets ?
GTX 280 overclocked get this at 1920x1200 AA 4x
Play Time: 138.09s, Average FPS: 14.48
Min FPS: 10.26 at frame 1125, Max FPS: 17.17 at frame 995
:headexplode::o
GTX 280 overclocked get this at 1920x1200 AA 4x
Play Time: 138.09s, Average FPS: 14.48
Min FPS: 10.26 at frame 1125, Max FPS: 17.17 at frame 995
:headexplode::o
How about 1280x1024, VH, no AA/AF?
not sure if this was linked:
LN2 cooling triple SLI ... (nana2)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=191313
How about 1280x1024, VH, no AA/AF?
VERY HIGH 1280x1024 DX10
Play Time: 56.15s, Average FPS: 35.62
Min FPS: 25.71 at frame 1956, Max FPS: 42.16 at frame 1751
just for fun also this is HIGH 1280x1024 DX9
Play Time: 28.80s, Average FPS: 69.45
Min FPS: 45.83 at frame 1981, Max FPS: 87.42 at frame 1005
GTX 280 overclocked get this at 1920x1200 AA 4x
Play Time: 138.09s, Average FPS: 14.48
Min FPS: 10.26 at frame 1125, Max FPS: 17.17 at frame 995
:headexplode::o
Hmm was that ATi XF test running on dual 4870s or 4850s ??
Hmm was that ATi XF test running on dual 4870s or 4850s ??
4850 CF
Thanks ^
btw Firingsquad preview is up :
http://firingsquad.com/hardware/nvidia_geforce_gtx_280_260_performance/
i'm waiting for the xbitlabs review. IMO xbit & FS are ones of the most decent review sites when it comes to new GPUs.
Lfctony
06-18-08, 10:21 AM
VERY HIGH 1280x1024 DX10
Play Time: 56.15s, Average FPS: 35.62
Min FPS: 25.71 at frame 1956, Max FPS: 42.16 at frame 1751
That's still unplayable. With an average of 32FPS at the timedemo, the final battle drops to 9-10fps. You need an average of above 40fps for the final battle to remain playable. I succeeded at doing that by dropping the resolution to 1440x900...
PeterJensen
06-18-08, 11:37 AM
I think allot here are forgetting the CRAP ATi drivers....I KNOW - I to this day still have a X2 on my desk....an utterly crap card. It may not be the cards fault but the drivers....All i know is that in a game like EVE Online that i play allot i get HALF the fps as an GTS/512....
I will NEVER spend my money on an ATI card again before i see tests in not "common" games. And thats FINAL!
But sure - the new cards maybe isane - if they are i will try them. Like i did the X2. But right now i'm 98% sure i will be sorry.
Sure this may be a rant, but its from personal experience!
BAHHHHH!
Redshirt #24
06-18-08, 02:19 PM
That FiringSquad article is actually quite positive (perhaps more so for the 260 than the 280), except for the bit on page 5 about apparent heat sensitivity. For me, that's a bit of a red flag...
2x 4850 = GTX 280 KILLER
http://www.forumdeluxx.de/forum/showthread.php?t=500923
I would rather have a fast single card. Can't be doing with crossfire or sli.
I will NEVER spend my money on an ATI card again before i see tests in not "common" games. And thats FINAL!
Sure this may be a rant, but its from personal experience!
BAHHHHH!
+1
That FiringSquad article is actually quite positive (perhaps more so for the 260 than the 280), except for the bit on page 5 about apparent heat sensitivity. For me, that's a bit of a red flag...
Hmmm good catch .. thats concerning news ..
I think allot here are forgetting the CRAP ATi drivers....I KNOW - I to this day still have a X2 on my desk....an utterly crap card. It may not be the cards fault but the drivers....All i know is that in a game like EVE Online that i play allot i get HALF the fps as an GTS/512....
I will NEVER spend my money on an ATI card again before i see tests in not "common" games. And thats FINAL!
But sure - the new cards maybe isane - if they are i will try them. Like i did the X2. But right now i'm 98% sure i will be sorry.
Sure this may be a rant, but its from personal experience!
BAHHHHH!
& what are you gonna do if these (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1686141&postcount=3) numbers came out to be true ? :p
Blacklash
06-18-08, 10:48 PM
If the HD 4870 turn out to be the fastest single GPU on the planet, I will own it. Otherwise, I am sticking with the GTX 280. By fastest, I don't mean winning 2 out of 18 game tests. I mean winning more than it loses @ 1920x and up with AA active.
Uberpwnage
06-19-08, 01:20 AM
Isn't the 4870 just a 4850 with GDDR5 and a higher core clock? Obviously the memory bandwidth is substantially higher but I've heard the 4870 is only 10-20% faster then the 4850. Any truth to this? Sad that all we're seeing is 4850 hype...
If the HD 4870 turn out to be the fastest single GPU on the planet, I will own it. Otherwise, I am sticking with the GTX 280. By fastest, I don't mean winning 2 out of 18 game tests. I mean winning more than it loses @ 1920x and up with AA active.
Same. And it will probably be cheaper than the 260.
Interesting times for us consumers :)
I have a CF board...so maybe just maybe I might go with the red camp depenidng on reviews :)
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.