PDA

View Full Version : Two faces

UDawg
05-09-03, 03:07 PM
The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/korea/article/0,2763,952289,00.html)

This makes me mad. Notice it took place during the 90's Clinton :rolleyes: I don't care who was involved, dem or gop. It still pisses me off.
digitalwanderer
05-09-03, 03:41 PM
Man, what a hypocrital tool/knob Rumsfield is!

To think, I kind of liked him when he first joined the administration. :rolleyes:
Mod
05-09-03, 03:55 PM
No, he is not just hypocrate. He violated an internatinal treat, and helped a so called terrorist state. He betrayed US. What´s the penalty for this ? I think is life sentence or execution in US.
DaveW
05-09-03, 03:57 PM
Sounds good to me :)
UDawg
05-09-03, 04:17 PM
Even though the article tries to implecate Rumsfeld the article makes it plain that Rumsfeld had nothing to do with it. Here is a little proof that he didn't know much of the deal.

The company also opened an office in the country's capital, Pyongyang, and the deal was signed a year later in 2000. Despite this, Mr Rumsfeld's office said that the de fence secretary did not "recall it being brought before the board at any time".

Also it was not illegal until Bush yanked the program to kiss N. Korea's butt.

The title of the article if very misleading. The Guardian also needs a better editor.

That being said these type of deals make me sick. I am not defending Rumsfeld. I don't know much about him and really don't care what happens to him politically. I am non partisan when it comes to Rumsfeld.
sytaylor
05-09-03, 06:10 PM
When reading the guradian treat it like the religious writings of cave men. While they may believe what they say fully, its so far from modern world sense its scary. Rags (british slang for newspapers) closer to the centre do a far better job.
UDawg
05-09-03, 06:18 PM
Originally posted by sytaylor
When reading the guradian treat it like the religious writings of cave men. While they may believe what they say fully, its so far from modern world sense its scary. Rags (british slang for newspapers) closer to the centre do a far better job.

Ya after all it is a online article. :rolleyes: It is just that the article is soo poorly written at it's attempt to link Rumsfeld and the accusing title. Sad really.