sytaylor
05-13-03, 07:00 AM
So the UK has historically had a very different set of options to 18 year olds. Some start work, some go for various training courses to lead in all kinds of directions, and historically the top achievers got into universities. Since Tony got in people have been crammed into universities in the idea that this is a good thing.
Leading to parents not only having to pay college fee's but new "Top Up" Fee's to ensure their childs education.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3023807.stm
The above article shows how the opposing party in the UK plans to resolve that situation but what i want to draw reference to is the comment at the bottom. Exclaiming that the new plans would mean less peopel get into universities. Simply because they would be chosen on merit alone!
Now i'm all far equal ops, but what i dont like is over agressive opportunities thrown at people at the expense of those who would normally be in this situation on merit (academic achievment or otherwise)
</rant>
thoughts?
Leading to parents not only having to pay college fee's but new "Top Up" Fee's to ensure their childs education.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3023807.stm
The above article shows how the opposing party in the UK plans to resolve that situation but what i want to draw reference to is the comment at the bottom. Exclaiming that the new plans would mean less peopel get into universities. Simply because they would be chosen on merit alone!
Now i'm all far equal ops, but what i dont like is over agressive opportunities thrown at people at the expense of those who would normally be in this situation on merit (academic achievment or otherwise)
</rant>
thoughts?