PDA

View Full Version : Rambus Wants To Stop NVIDIA Products From Selling In US


nekrosoft13
11-09-08, 06:44 PM
Los Altos, California, United States - 11/06/2008 Rambus Inc. (Nasdaq:RMBS), one of the world’s premier technology licensing companies specializing in high-speed memory architectures, today announced it has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) requesting the commencement of an investigation pertaining to NVIDIA products. The complaint seeks an exclusion order barring the importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation of products that infringe nine Rambus patents from the Ware and Barth families of patents. The accused products include NVIDIA products that incorporate DDR, DDR2, DDR3, LPDDR, GDDR, GDDR2, and GDDR3 memory controllers, including graphics processors, and media and communications processors.

The complaint names NVIDIA as a proposed respondent, as well as companies whose products incorporate accused NVIDIA products and are imported into the United States. These respondents include: Asustek Computer Inc. and Asus Computer International, BFG Technologies, Biostar Microtech and Biostar Microtech International Corp., Diablotek Inc., EVGA Corp., G.B.T. Inc. and Giga-Byte Technology Co., Hewlett-Packard, MSI Computer Corp. and Micro-Star International Co., Palit Multimedia Inc. and Palit Microsystems Ltd., Pine Technology Holdings, and Sparkle Computer Co.

“We believe this action is necessary given NVIDIA’s continued willful infringement of our patents,” said Tom Lavelle, senior vice president and general counsel at Rambus. “Rambus engineers and scientists have made tremendous contributions to the industry, and we need to protect our patented inventions on behalf of our shareholders and in fairness to our paying licensees.”

The ITC is expected to decide whether to initiate an investigation under this complaint within 30 days. In a separate action, Rambus filed a patent infringement suit against NVIDIA in July 2008. Additional information is available at http://investor.rambus.com in the Litigation Update section.


http://www.vr-zone.com/articles/rambus-wants-to-stop-nvidia-products-from-selling-in-us/6184.html

hemmy
11-09-08, 07:53 PM
What has Rambus ever done other than sue everyone on earth?

ViN86
11-09-08, 11:35 PM
didnt they invent RD-RAM that was supposed to revolutionize the industry like 15 years ago, but didnt sell for ****? :lol:

EDIT:

yup lol. and theyre real bitter about it. Intel phased out their stupid RDRAM tech in the late 90's early 2000's and they think the pricing scheme was aimed at driving their POS tech, that was high latency and high heat for minimal speed increases out of the market.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambus_DRAM

In 2004, it was revealed that Infineon, Hynix, Samsung, Micron, and Elpida had entered into a price-fixing scheme .[15] Infineon, Hynix, Samsung and Elpida all entered plea agreements with the US DOJ, pleading guilty to price fixing over 1999-2002.[16] They paid fines totalling over $700 million and numerous executives were sentenced to jail time.

Rambus has alleged that, as part of the conspiracy, the DRAM manufacturers acted to depress the price of DDR memory in an effort to prevent RDRAM from succeeding in the market. Those allegations are the subject of lawsuits by Rambus against the various companies.

jlippo
11-10-08, 05:21 AM
didnt they invent RD-RAM that was supposed to revolutionize the industry like 15 years ago, but didnt sell for ****? :lol:
Well, their memory has been used in Nintendo 64, Ps2 and Ps3 so they have sold some memory. ;)
But yeah, on PC side not so much.

XMAN52373
11-10-08, 02:15 PM
didnt they invent RD-RAM that was supposed to revolutionize the industry like 15 years ago, but didnt sell for ****? :lol:

EDIT:

yup lol. and theyre real bitter about it. Intel phased out their stupid RDRAM tech in the late 90's early 2000's and they think the pricing scheme was aimed at driving their POS tech, that was high latency and high heat for minimal speed increases out of the market.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rambus_DRAM

At the time, the P3 suffered when using RDRAM, but the P4 shined until the i865 and dual channel DDR memory came out. RDRAM and a P4 was the fastest for awhile.

hemmy
11-10-08, 03:45 PM
I had the i850 chipset with the first Pentium 4's that came out which used Rambus, and it was ridic. overpriced and required dual-channel :(

Galvin
11-11-08, 04:02 PM
I wish Rambus would just die already. It would do the world a favor.
Its a POS company that sues over memory technology that has nothing to do with rdram.

Viral
11-12-08, 02:37 AM
At the time, the P3 suffered when using RDRAM, but the P4 shined until the i865 and dual channel DDR memory came out. RDRAM and a P4 was the fastest for awhile.

RDRAM was THE reason for me to avoid P4's since it meant a very overpriced platform. Of course it made intel look good in benchmarks, so everyone bought SDRAM mobo's and thought they'd get what they saw in the benchmarks.

Rakeesh
11-12-08, 07:57 AM
P4 was a complete joke from the very beginning to the very end.

Madpistol
11-12-08, 10:25 AM
I'm suing Rambus for wasting my ****ing time by suing Nvidia. :p

Atomizer
12-10-08, 06:05 AM
Its stuff like this that interferes with progress

Lfctony
12-10-08, 11:52 AM
Yay! Let's forget about actually developing technology companies will implement and just make money by suing others...

v3rninater
12-10-08, 12:34 PM
I hate how obviously wrong this situation is, it's like Rambus just needs to go away.

abtomat74
12-25-08, 10:28 PM
Wow, all these comments and not a single one of you knows a damn thing about what the lawsuit is really about.

Just a guess, but I imagine the technology used in current ram might have been taken from the RAMBUS design. Considering the story of them suing previously turned out to be TRUE in that the price fixing did in fact take place...maybe they have a factual reason again now?

"IF" any of their recent claim is true, why shouldn't they sue? Duh.

thor1182
01-06-09, 03:02 PM
Wow, all these comments and not a single one of you knows a damn thing about what the lawsuit is really about.

Just a guess, but I imagine the technology used in current ram might have been taken from the RAMBUS design. Considering the story of them suing previously turned out to be TRUE in that the price fixing did in fact take place...maybe they have a factual reason again now?

"IF" any of their recent claim is true, why shouldn't they sue? Duh.


you go on about people above you not knowing what they are talking about, then guess yourself what it is about...:headexplode:

Dreamingawake
01-18-09, 02:48 PM
wow