p3dj4
11-21-08, 04:02 PM
HD tune pro 3.10
I just did some speed test on my two HD ( plz don't ask why win is on 16mb )
1. Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 500630 16MB (win XP)
2. Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500320 32MB (backup)
i did 3 test on each HD
Minimum | Maximum | Average | Access Time | Burst Rate | CPU Usage | Temp |
1.
test1 35 | 70.8 | 60.1 | 13.0 | 154.1 | 0.8% | 28C
test2 31.8 | 70.9 | 60.5 | 12.9 | 159.7 | 0.6% | 28C
test3 38.6 | 70.9 | 60.6 | 12.9 | 163.4 | 0.6% | 29C
2.
test1 52 | 107.1 | 85.7 | 12.3 | 197.2 | 0.9% | 25C
test2 52 | 107.1 | 85.7 | 12.3 | 197.3 | 0.9% | 25C
test3 52 | 107.1 | 85.7 | 12.3 | 194.1 | 0.9% | 25C
I did some research and found that 7200.11 is faster then Samsung F1 HD753LJ ? Can some one confirm this
http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/4303/barracuda500gb72001132meu2.jpg
I just did some speed test on my two HD ( plz don't ask why win is on 16mb )
1. Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 500630 16MB (win XP)
2. Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500320 32MB (backup)
i did 3 test on each HD
Minimum | Maximum | Average | Access Time | Burst Rate | CPU Usage | Temp |
1.
test1 35 | 70.8 | 60.1 | 13.0 | 154.1 | 0.8% | 28C
test2 31.8 | 70.9 | 60.5 | 12.9 | 159.7 | 0.6% | 28C
test3 38.6 | 70.9 | 60.6 | 12.9 | 163.4 | 0.6% | 29C
2.
test1 52 | 107.1 | 85.7 | 12.3 | 197.2 | 0.9% | 25C
test2 52 | 107.1 | 85.7 | 12.3 | 197.3 | 0.9% | 25C
test3 52 | 107.1 | 85.7 | 12.3 | 194.1 | 0.9% | 25C
I did some research and found that 7200.11 is faster then Samsung F1 HD753LJ ? Can some one confirm this
http://img47.imageshack.us/img47/4303/barracuda500gb72001132meu2.jpg