Xbit correction

[SlyBoots]

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/display/20030528101933.html

Volt gonna have to wipe that egg off his face. :p

I think Anton heard from ATI's legal dept.;)

[Sazar]

Originally posted by SlyBoots
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/display/20030528101933.html

Volt gonna have to wipe that egg off his face. :p

I think Anton heard from ATI's legal dept.;)

:D

/me claps

[creedamd]

lmao(sarcastically)

[ClyssaN]

to fast in making assumptions, now the damage is done ...

[R.Carter]

Yeah, it's kind of hard to say that ATI was really intending to outright cheat when they haven't really done anything that actually reduces the workload of the hardware.

They certainly did intend to obtain higher results, but seemed careful not to do it in a manner that altered the quality of the output or reduced the workload of the card.

But of course some people have different opinions on this and some think if you're going to do cheat you should do it "properly" like Nvidia did.

[digitalwanderer]

nVidia could really take a clue from ATi on the classy way to handle this situation.... :p

[-=DVS=-]

So Nvidia is the one cheating badly not ATI , take that you Nvidiots hehe :p

[GlowStick]

Originally posted by -=DVS=-
So Nvidia is the one cheating badly not ATI , take that you Nvidiots hehe :p

Yes, the ATi PR team stated that.

[StealthHawk]

http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=12547

I know this thread was first, but the other one seems more informative ;)