View Full Version : Finally Crysis Warhead is playable at max for me.
gerardfraser
02-08-09, 01:36 AM
1920x1200 @16xQ DX9 and DX10 64 Bit
I was pulling my hair out with my setup,so I remove my physics card.Stopped playing in 32 bit mode and found a sweet spot for my video cards.
E8400 -3825Mhz
DDR800-5-5-5-18 T2
Raptors in Raid 0
SLI 285-679core-1261mem-1543shader
1920x1200 64 bit DX9 16xq enthusiast avalanche run
Min=26.29
Avg=36.22
Max=47.79
http://www.postimage.org/Pq1ypv8S.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1ypv8S)
1920x1200 64 bit DX10 16xq enthusiast avalanche run
Min=19.41
Avg=33.84
Max=48.30
http://www.postimage.org/aV1sANRi.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=aV1sANRi)
Crysis 1920x1200 DX10 64 bit 16xq island run
Min=11.96
Avg=31.36
Max=39.73
http://www.postimage.org/Pq1yqs0i.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1yqs0i)
NarcissistZero
02-08-09, 03:44 AM
FINALLY you can play the best looking game ever at absurdly high settings! God, it was like torture until now I'm sure.
gerardfraser
02-08-09, 05:39 AM
LOL it was torture,I could max it out at low rez,but never @1920x1200,like most, spent a tonne of money.Bring on Crysis 2.
Really though I love the game and played Crysis everyday since it came out,also play Warhead everyday.For me no game draws me in like these games.
Heres how good Crysis is,it broke my WOW crack habit of 15 hr days for 1.5 years.
NarcissistZero
02-08-09, 09:37 AM
I can run it in 1920, 4xAA with everything on high, which is good enough for me. Glad you're enjoying the game.
ASUSEN7900GTX
02-08-09, 10:03 AM
did the new patch help anything?
i haven´t patched it yet
also was 64-bit better than 32-bit(XP) vs 64 vista?
ASUSEN7900GTX
02-08-09, 11:10 AM
System Information
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP
System memory: 2,0 GB
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.66GHz
CPU speed: 2666 MHz
Graphics card: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series - 512 MB
Benchmark information
Demo: Airfield
Quality: Very High (tweaked)
Renderer mode: DirectX 9
Antialising mode: From System
Filtering mode: From System
MultiGPU support: Disabled
Boost renderer: Disabled
Use Custom Config File: Yes
Random .exe: Disabled
Resolution: 1360 × 768 (Custom)
Result(1): Minimum= 11 FPS Average= 36 FPS Max= 49 FPS
Result(2): Minimum= 11 FPS Average= 38 FPS Max= 49 FPS
gerardfraser
02-08-09, 12:47 PM
did the new patch help anything?
i haven´t patched it yet
also was 64-bit better than 32-bit(XP) vs 64 vista?
There pretty close in FPS 32 and 64.32 I would say is faster.Just that with the CFG I use is better then Enthusiast and with the 285 cards playing 32 bit I would get the low FPS dips.Switched to 64 bit for the hell of it,and then it was smooth no more of those dips for me.
trivium nate
02-08-09, 01:22 PM
i get like 15 fps in both crysis games on the highest settings :)
AngelGraves13
02-16-09, 04:26 PM
I have yet to test it on my new rig...can't wait.
JasonPC
02-16-09, 05:56 PM
Dude... what's with the yellow and green? my eyes
Dreamweavernoob
02-16-09, 08:15 PM
With a Q9550 @ 3.6Ghz, 4Gb Ram @ 1000Mhz 5-5-5 and a GTX 295 @ 1920x1200 high quality is this game playable?
is a GTX 285 a lot less playable?
many thanks
dude give us some real screens at those graphic settings.
gerardfraser
02-18-09, 04:07 AM
dude give us some real screens at those graphic settings.
Heres a screenshot tank level crysis,rest are show 16xQ
http://www.postimage.org/Pq2shbFS.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq2shbFS)
Some shots of Crysis DX10 64 BIT 1920x1200 16xQ MAXED
First screen shows FSAA
http://www.postimage.org/Pq1IcojJ.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1IcojJ)
Next shot looking at antenna
http://www.postimage.org/gxNbO6S.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=gxNbO6S)
Blowing stuff up
http://www.postimage.org/gx17JDQA.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=gx17JDQA)
Some shots of Crysis Warhead DX10 64 BIT 1920x1200 16xQ MAXED
First screen shows FSAA
http://www.postimage.org/Pq1DxpV0.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1DxpV0)
Next shot looking at antenna
http://www.postimage.org/Pq1DwbAA.jpg (http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=Pq1DwbAA)
$n][pErMan
02-19-09, 06:58 PM
The GTX285 OWNS this game! :)
XDanger
02-20-09, 06:00 PM
When a card can max out Crysis on my monitor with the minimum frame-rate being the same as the refresh-rate then I would say its been owned, Not until then.
But then you pump up the DX10 effects to make it look better with a mod and you're back the square 1.
$n][pErMan
02-20-09, 07:15 PM
When a card can max out Crysis on my monitor with the minimum frame-rate being the same as the refresh-rate then I would say its been owned, Not until then.
But then you pump up the DX10 effects to make it look better with a mod and you're back the square 1.
Well I have a 24" widescreen monitor and game at 1920x1200 and I consider 30FPS average on max settings pretty damn good! Granted its not 60FPS = 60Hz but its damn awesome seeing as untill recently that game took a hell of a lot of power to do that (Tri-SLi and Quad-SLi).
XDanger
02-20-09, 08:37 PM
[pErMan;1938053']Well I have a 24" widescreen monitor and game at 1920x1200 and I consider 30FPS average on max settings pretty damn good!
Only a fool would argue with that, I think by the time cards can make Crysis run the way I suggested the game will be irrelevant.
$n][pErMan
02-20-09, 08:45 PM
Only a fool would argue with that, I think by the time cards can make Crysis run the way I suggested the game will be irrelevant.
Much like with FarCry. By the time you could play that game at 120 FPS no one cared anymore an it looked like poo compaired to what was out... :p
ASUSEN7900GTX
02-21-09, 06:43 AM
i wonder why it is that when i start Crysis W it starts on level 1 and not as it should go to the main menu and it is out of control too the character flies and i can´t control it if i quit to menu and try start a new game same thing.
Why is this?
trivium nate
03-22-09, 06:55 PM
I did some pretty good benchmarks on crysis earlier with the new setup but once the evga step up stuff goes through ill get my GTX 260! and post back :)
gerardfraser
04-17-09, 12:52 AM
Just did a bench on old Crysis with new machine.
http://pic.leech.it/t/e47a0/baf58e59untitled.jpg (http://pic.leech.it/pic.php?id=baf58e59untitled.jpg)
mojoman0
04-17-09, 02:45 AM
Just did a bench on old Crysis with new machine.
http://pic.leech.it/t/e47a0/baf58e59untitled.jpg (http://pic.leech.it/pic.php?id=baf58e59untitled.jpg)
Very nice! Specs?
gerardfraser
04-17-09, 03:52 AM
TriSLI 285 gtx ,core I7,To be honest not as fast as the E8400 when gaming,or hdd reads,believe or not but hey it is what it is.Other then that computer kicks ass lol.
trivium nate
04-21-09, 01:50 AM
4/21/2009 12:34:27 AM - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1280x1024, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=1, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 69.83s, Average FPS: 28.64
Min FPS: 14.35 at frame 144, Max FPS: 41.38 at frame 986
Average Tri/Sec: -20346950, Tri/Frame: -710426
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.29
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)
================================================== ============
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
4/21/2009 12:34:27 AM - Vista
Run #1- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Last Average FPS: 28.64
crysis warhead
Processor: AMD Phenom(tm) 9950 Quad-Core Processor @ 2605 Mhz
CPU ID: x86 Family 16 Model 2 Stepping 3
Operating System: Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate 32-bit Service Pack 1
Physical memory: 3.25 GB
Display adapter: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 896 MB
Video Processor: GeForce GTX 260
Driver version: 7.15.11.8250 (20090327140300.000000-000)
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-US2H
================================================== ============
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 3145, Recorded Time: 83.68s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 91.51s, Average FPS: 34.37
Min FPS: 24.85 at frame 2055, Max FPS: 50.42 at frame 731
Average Tri/Sec: -9425097, Tri/Frame: -274240
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 0.44
TimeDemo Play Ended, (1 Runs Performed)
================================================== ============
//////////// Summary \\\\\\\\\\\\\
04/21/2009 00:49:28 - Microsoft® Windows Vista™ Ultimate 32-bit Service Pack 1
DirectX 10 ENTHUSIAST 1X @ Map: avalanche @ 0 1280 x 1024 AA 0x
==> Framerate [ Min: 24.85 Max: 50.42 Avg: 34.37 ]
FastRedPonyCar
05-06-09, 11:48 PM
still waiting for the gtx300....
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.