josiahsuarez
03-30-09, 02:12 AM
I don't think anti-trust laws affect Intel if they have no competitors left, and I don't think they exist to ensure that competitors exist.
I believe anti-trust laws mainly exist to ensure a fair business environment for companies to compete in.
the antitrust issues Intel has faced have to do with them abusing their dominant market position to stifle competition, specifically competition from AMD. if AMD goes out of business, that alone would make a compelling argument for the prosecution. Intel would be working against their own interest if they are planning to run AMD out of business, while the US and EU governments are breathing down their necks and court dates are looming. the lawsuit Intel recently filed against AMD is just an attempt to get some leverage over AMD because these cases are going to trial soon. Intel has alot of expensive lawyers that would find some sort of bone to pick with AMD for this purpose, if not over GFC then something else. there's alot of BS corporate politics involved here.
I believe anti-trust laws mainly exist to ensure a fair business environment for companies to compete in.
the antitrust issues Intel has faced have to do with them abusing their dominant market position to stifle competition, specifically competition from AMD. if AMD goes out of business, that alone would make a compelling argument for the prosecution. Intel would be working against their own interest if they are planning to run AMD out of business, while the US and EU governments are breathing down their necks and court dates are looming. the lawsuit Intel recently filed against AMD is just an attempt to get some leverage over AMD because these cases are going to trial soon. Intel has alot of expensive lawyers that would find some sort of bone to pick with AMD for this purpose, if not over GFC then something else. there's alot of BS corporate politics involved here.