Larrabee might be delayed to Summer 2011

[slaWter]

I'm going to ignore your PM...

[Xion X2]

FIRST Can you PLEASE stop editing your posts even after my reply. Your original reply had ONLY a picture of crying baby. I came couple days later and there is a long reply added. The same was in the other thread where your reply was only a picture showing me finger and also when I did see it couple days later it was replaced with long text reply.

Heinz, I'll edit my post any time that I want. The posts you reference were edited a whole 5 minutes later. If you weren't following along behind me keeping your eyes peeled for anything you can argue with and replying within mere minutes, then it shouldn't have affected you so much.

Here (http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=116585)I do have some recommended reading for you about GREAT Crossfire scaling on 4870 X2 (not by me).
I see NOTHING there about 1080p problems. True, the review is done on 1680x1050 resolution. Funny, even than the so called spared 1920x1200 monitor didn't exist than. Why didn't the reviver mention 1080p scaling problem or even more so the Crossfire problems he was experiencing??? ALL reviews when they have such problem do say so.

Because I wasn't using the 1080p for gaming at the time. That is quite clear on the benchmark graphs. Have you ever seen a 1080p that scales to 1920x1200? It's called 1080p for a reason. :rolleyes:

I see NOTHING there about 1080p problems. True, the review is done on 1680x1050 resolution. Funny, even than the so called spared 1920x1200 monitor didn't exist than

I purchased the 1920x1200 monitor after those initial benchmarks on the 4870 Crossfire setup when I was still gaming on a 1680x1050 monitor. Why is that "funny?" If you look at the two reviews (Crossfire vs. Crossfire X) it's quite clear since the benchmark graphs for the 4870 Crossfire setup show 1680x1050 and the graphs for the 4870X2 Crossfire setup show 1920x1200.

Again, reading is fundamental. Learn to do it. I'll make it very simple for you so that you can understand:

1) I had a Crossfire 4870 system on a 1680x1050 monitor. I also owned a 1080p TV at the time that I did not use for gaming since I had a PC monitor at the same time.

2) I sold my Crossfire 4870 system for Crossfire 4870X2. Along with the upgrade, shortly after doing some initial benching, I invested in a 1920x1200 PC monitor since I had extra graphics power to experiment with. When I benched this system, I was STILL not using the 1080p for gaming (hence the 1920 x 1200 resolution indicated on the benchmark graphs.)

3) Some time after that benching session, I decided to sell my 1920x1200 monitor since I already had a 1080p that I could use to play PC titles on. In the process, I discovered that the 1080p did not scale properly with Crossfire. Games did not run as they did on the 1920x1200 PC monitor.

4) After this discovery, and while entering a spell where I did not play games as much, I decided to sell the X2s because 1) they did not scale properly on my 1080p and 2) because I needed the money and the GTX260 was much cheaper and an attractive card at its pricepoint.

Does that give you all the back-story that you needed? Perhaps now you can get me out of your mind for 5 minutes and we can both get back to our regularly-scheduled boring lives.

Now I hope we can close this once and for ever but I very much doubt so.

I doubt it also, unless you can learn to read and then to keep your mouth shut before you misinterpret and then subsequently quote people out of context.

I am all for cultural diversity, but if you cannot speak English effectively then do not argue with people who speak it fluently. It makes for a pointless debate when you repeatedly interpret things incorrectly.

And I also would advise you to quit PM'ng people with argumental threats. I'm not going to reply to any more of them, and it appears that others are becoming fed up with you as well.

Lastly, never pick fights with someone who has even remedial photoshop skills.

http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/9743/mystalker.jpg (http://img29.imageshack.us/i/mystalker.jpg/)

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7476/stalkerlove.jpg (http://img146.imageshack.us/i/stalkerlove.jpg/)

[mullet]

Heinz68, has officially gone over the edge. :rofl:rofl:rofl

[XMAN52373]

Heinz68, has officially gone over the edge. :rofl:rofl:rofl


Officially? I thought he had months ago. Maybe he should stick to Rage3d where he can find love and everything that is red to his liking.

[nekrosoft13]

Heinz68, has officially gone over the edge. :rofl:rofl:rofl

he called me a friend :headexplode:

[Heinz68]

Heinz, I'll edit my post any time that I want. The posts you reference were edited a whole 5 minutes later. If you weren't following along behind me keeping your eyes peeled for anything you can argue with and replying within mere minutes, then it shouldn't have affected you so much.
It's a common practice not to edit a post when reply was already posted. I have better things to do then follow you that's why I did see the LONG edit couple days later after my reply. In the other thread you did not even edit the post but COMPLETELY replaced it.

I purchased the 1920x1200 monitor after those initial benchmarks on the 4870 Crossfire setup when I was still gaming on a 1680x1050 monitor. Why is that "funny?" If you look at the two reviews (Crossfire vs. Crossfire X) it's quite clear since the benchmark graphs for the 4870 Crossfire setup show 1680x1050 and the graphs for the 4870X2 Crossfire setup show 1920x1200.
Because I wasn't using the 1080p for gaming at the time. That is quite clear on the benchmark graphs. Have you ever seen a 1080p that scales to 1920x1200? It's called 1080p for a reason.
I do know what resolution the benchmarks were done on, I pointed that out and separated the links. I was only wondering why the benchmarks were never done on the 1080p, now saying you had at the time. Was the so called spared 1920x1200 monitor ONLY purchased for the few QuadFire benchmarks?
I do know why it's called 1080p after all I need to set the resolution in every game for the last few years.
I even specified the 1080p resolution (1920x1080) in one off the paragraph in my reply, so there is no misunderstanding at later point. Go check it out.

Again, reading is fundamental. Learn to do it. I'll make it very simple for you so that you can understand:

1) I had a Crossfire 4870 system on a 1680x1050 monitor. I also owned a 1080p TV at the time that I did not use for gaming since I had a PC monitor at the same time.
At about the same time slaWter posted his problem with 1080p display on his TV and you did know about it. Wasn't that good reason for at least a test run on your 1080p TV ? You could have give him +1 right there and not one year later.
The fact according to your on postings is: you NEVER had the 1080p TV when doing the benchmarks so this reading point is rather useless.

2) I sold my Crossfire 4870 system for Crossfire 4870X2. Along with the upgrade, shortly after doing some initial benching, I invested in a 1920x1200 PC monitor since I had extra graphics power to experiment with. When I benched this system, I was STILL not using the 1080p for gaming (hence the 1920 x 1200 resolution indicated on the benchmark graphs.)
I do know why you didn't bench at 1080p (see 1) reply). So also rather useless reading point.

3) Some time after that benching session, I decided to sell my 1920x1200 monitor since I already had a 1080p that I could use to play PC titles on. In the process, I discovered that the 1080p did not scale properly with Crossfire. Games did not run as they did on the 1920x1200 PC monitor.
Again no idea why you're talking about Crossfire if your TV did not display the 1080p correctly it would show the same with single card. slaWter problem was not with Crossfire. Since you didn't have the 1080p TV at the time this reading point is also useless.

4) After this discovery, and while entering a spell where I did not play games as much, I decided to sell the X2s because 1) they did not scale properly on my 1080p and 2) because I needed the money and the GTX260 was much cheaper and an attractive card at its pricepoint.
By the way since you're my PERFECT Eglish teacher, the spell check could not find "pricepoint" but with my broken English I do know what you mean.

You did mention the " not playing games as much" REASON few times before, I believe your 1080p scaling problem didn't come up until this thread.
I think the financial reason is the main point since in the past you had such big downgrades for financial reasons when you lost your job.
Even when you were selling the 2 HD 4870 X2 you were thinking about getting single 4870, don't know why if your TV was not displaying 1080p correctly with ATI drivers.
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?t=33935044
Anyway as I said before few TV models have problem to display the 1080p in couple games, mainly with DX10 and for that few fixes exist.
Since you didn't have the 1080p TV with the 4870 X2, this is also useless reading point.

Does that give you all the back-story that you needed? Perhaps now you can get me out of your mind for 5 minutes and we can both get back to our regularly-scheduled boring lives.

You're not on my mind for even a minute, I do hope you do understand this is not about you or me even if you're trying to turn in into such.

I am all for cultural diversity, but if you cannot speak English effectively then do not argue with people who speak it fluently. It makes for a pointless debate when you repeatedly interpret things incorrectly.
Have no idea what "cultural diversity" if any, has to do with 1080p display, as for my English, true I did learn English as fourth language. Since I'm about 25 years in Canada I have no problem to read and communicate in English. I did first learned the English after my school years so my grammar is far from perfect but the same applies to quite few US High School graduates, from the statistics I did read.
Now why do I need to explain this VERY much off subject point again, I already did explain it to you long time ago when you also attacked me about it.

And I also would advise you to quit PM'ng people with argumental threats. I'm not going to reply to any more of them, and it appears that others are becoming fed up with you as well.
This is complete baloney.
Mods on many forums usually suggest to take some never ending arguments to PM and sometime even close such thread. Looks to me you rather prefer to argue in the forums.

In the OTHER thread I did PM you for couple reasons.
First, your original reply in that thread was showing only a picture of a finger pointing up, I can only guess where. With text, something like this "I'm not going to waist the other fingers for typing."
I did not reply on the above at all and was hoping it was the end off the argument. Couple days later when I visited the forum again all the above in your reply was deleted and replaced with long on going argument.

Second, since it was already couple days old I decided to let you have the last word in that thread and used the PM and you did reply to such. Since it was getting rather personal I did reply one more time suggesting there is no reason for more replies from YOU since I will either block it or delete it. So that was the reason why you didn't reply any more, why twist the facts.

Anyway even this reply would have go via PM since I'm very late about it and it would also close the forum argument. So again you could have the last very much misleading forum post on the subject.

I guess by the others becoming fed up you mean the ONE reply to slaWter. I choose to PM him for good reason. If I did know he would reply to my PM in the forum I would have never used the PM.

Lastly, never pick fights with someone who has even remedial photoshop skills.
Unbelievable how many of subject arguments you manage to include. I'm really impressed with your Photoshop skills specially since any kid can do the same or better with MS Paint.

[Heinz68]

Heinz68, has officially gone over the edge. :rofl:rofl:rofl
Just another personal attack by you.
I believe you calling me "****ing moron" or suggesting that I'm also posting using another nick is going over the edge.
If you have nothing constructive to say just PLEASE get of my back.

The above reply would have also go via PM but since some people objected to such here it is.

Officially? I thought he had months ago. Maybe he should stick to Rage3d where he can find love and everything that is red to his liking.

I don't know why you needed to join this personal attack and also I don't know where are you coming from.

Anyway I'm not looking for love at any hardware forum so why are you suggesting I should go looking for it at Rage3D.

I'm already member at Rage3d since September 2006 with 11 posts, last post also at September 2006. Since I have limited time for posting I decided to stay here, that is if you don't mind.

I'm very very sorry that I can't post like this: (specialy if not based on facts)
"Crossfire scaling is terrible", " ATI drivers are SUCKS", "what I see is crap", "They are absolutely terrible", "right now their drivers SUCK and are the worst I've seen in 5+ years of PC gaming"
I don't thing the above is any help for the community except for the very few ATI bashers at this forum. So why is there any need for it.

he called me a friend
Come on necro you must also know with friends like YOU I'm not in need for any enemies.

[Xion X2]

I think the financial reason is the main point since in the past you had such big downgrades for financial reasons when you lost your job.

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/5503/46683950.png (http://img217.imageshack.us/i/46683950.png/)

http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/8470/stalkersl.jpg (http://img217.imageshack.us/i/stalkersl.jpg/)

You are now on my ignore list, and I'm thinking seriously about having a restraining order written up. Goodbye.

[Ancient76]

http://www.pcper.com/comments.php?nid=7531

In a move that is surely going to raise some eyebrows, Intel has apparently decided to add a pair of HD video decoders to the logic on-board the Larrabee graphics chip; this according to a story over at SemiAccurate. This would definitely go against the whole premise of the Larrabee architecture: to do as much work as possible in x86 software without the need for dedicated hardware to any one specific task. Intel said from the beginning that textures required special hardware to run most efficiently but now that Intel has decided HD decoding is too inefficient on the platform, you can't help but wonder if there are other tasks with the same fate.

:lol: