final fantasy 11 benchmark

[KasuCode]

what did you get

i got 6924 with a 9800pro128

[yoladude]

what is this benchmark, what does it require, and where can i get it?

[KasuCode]

sorry x-plays on ill post a link in a min

[KasuCode]

min req is like

800mhz
256mb ram
gf2mx440+

get it here

http://www.playonline.com/Download/FFXiBench.zip

i would say at least
1ghz
512mb ram
gf4 64mb or higher to play it decent

[yoladude]

k...its small, ill run it, and post results. specs in sig.

[yoladude]

aaaaaaa....my eyes!!!! i hate low res.
anyway, i got around 4800-4900 (forgot exact number). graphics, apart from the res, look pretty good.

[KasuCode]

yea screen shots look alot beter

[Riff]

Yecch. I got 5991 on a 5900 Ultra, at 4xAA, 8xAF, quality settings. I got 6137 with everything set to highest performance and no AA and no AF.

That has to have been the most bland benchmark I have ever seen. Even less action than the stalker in-game movie :P

[KasuCode]

lol i know i know


whats your system spec's thats odd that you didnt get closer to my score

[RAY16]

This thing looks horrible, so why does it run so bad? I got like 3500 or something (wasn't really paying attention). Nasty slow downs on a Athlon XP 2000+ and GeForce 3, i know my rig isn't top of the line, but its not weak either. I've played games that look better then this in a higher resolution and they still run faster.

[Lfctony]

6854 with 4XAA/8AF quality settings, on a P4 3Ghz and a GFFX 5800@500/960.

[poursoul]

this bench has been around for the better part of a year (or more i dunno)

The reason it runs so crap is because it was made for a console not a pc. I would guess that a lot (if not all) of the operations are being done via cpu.

A good test would be to get someone with a gf2mx and a high end p4 to run this bench.

[KasuCode]

the demo was made for pc its really to test if you can play the game or not

1500 you can play but will lag
2500 you can play with lil or no lag
4000 you should not have any lag

i think thay put it in a low rez because more people can handel the bench that way
otherwise if it was high rez less people can handel and less people would look forward to getin the game

im sure thay had there resons

[poursoul]

Originally posted by poursoul
I would guess that a lot (if not all) of the operations are being done via cpu.

Because

The reason it runs so crap is because it was made for a console not a pc.

is that better.

It is in low res because it was made for a tv not a monitor.

Until they start putting in code for gpu/vpu's on todays market, not just emulating a bunch of code on your processor, i will not consider it "made" for a pc.

[milkman]

Did any of you guys enter into the beta test on the nvidia website? the frist 1000 get a beta kit, and the first 50 get a tshirt... everyone go registser! then post on here if you get accepted.

Kev

[KasuCode]

i signed for nvidias and ati's test kits no work so i think im outa luck

[milkman]

i'm sure that they wont be replying to us until july, well atleast for nvidia anyway, it said not to expect a reply until july after you finished filling out the form.

Kev

[Zenikase]

I got 4703 with my current setup. It's surprising that there are noticeable slowdowns in multiple parts of this benchmark, considering the fact that it's running at an unacceptably low resolution (anti-aliasing ahoy!) with blurry, low-res textures and relatively simple geometry. Square should try to work on hardware acceleration before this game ships out.

[Matthyahuw]

5310 with a XP 2700+ (200x11) and a Ti4600, this is with stuff running in the background tho, wasn't gonna shutdown my DLs for this...

what a crappy looking game!