Ati cheats in UT03 and aquanox??

[heedory]

http://www.computerbase.de/article.php?id=237&page=4&sid=ee70479b6e74281eee787eee65da07b1

anyone can read German?
summary of the page will be highly appreciated

[tertsi]

"It's just a bug" @ ATI

[ntxawg]

Originally posted by heedory
http://www.computerbase.de/article.php?id=237&page=4&sid=ee70479b6e74281eee787eee65da07b1

anyone can read German?
summary of the page will be highly appreciated

translate it with altavista babel fish. i just skimmed through it but where is the part about the cheating at??? or are you just guessing from the scores?

[StealthHawk]

Originally posted by ntxawg
translate it with altavista babel fish. i just skimmed through it but where is the part about the cheating at??? or are you just guessing from the scores?

They clearly have graphs labelled "optimized" and "unoptimized," with unoptimized scores being lower. How exactly they got those scores is questionable ATM. I would guess they used Unwinder's anti-detection patch script.

[GlowStick]

Looks like a very intresting article, if i only could read it : (

oh well!

[heedory]

Originally posted by ntxawg
translate it with altavista babel fish. i just skimmed through it but where is the part about the cheating at??? or are you just guessing from the scores?

they also showed ugly texture quality of radeon9800 pro
you can not see through babel fish..

http://home.megapass.co.kr/~heedory2/aqua.jpg
http://home.megapass.co.kr/~heedory2/ut03.jpg

[gokickrocks]

Originally posted by heedory
they also showed ugly texture quality of radeon9800 pro
you can not see through babel fish..


they say its like that up to 8xAF...

[-=DVS=-]

Well for comparision they should have added Geforce Family :rolleyes: could be even worse who knows . And people play with atleast 8xAF moust 16xAF , who cares how lower modes look like noone realy uses them :angel2: