PDA

View Full Version : New screen shots of ID's Rage


Pages : [1] 2 3 4

dikinher
05-04-10, 11:43 AM
Looks like Borderlands.


http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/idtech5/news.html?sid=6260965&tag=topslot;img;2&mode=previews


http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2010/123/942657_20100504_screen003.jpg

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2010/123/942657_20100504_screen004.jpg

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2010/123/942657_20100504_screen005.jpg

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2010/123/942657_20100504_screen006.jpg

http://image.com.com/gamespot/images/2010/123/942657_20100504_screen007.jpg

de><ta
05-04-10, 11:50 AM
Look pretty, but I am sick of the entire Fallout and Borderlands genre. I want more like GT4... :/

Sean_W
05-04-10, 11:59 AM
Look pretty, but I am sick of the entire Fallout and Borderlands genre. I want more like GT4... :/

Yep, it's pretty depressing but I enjoyed Fallout 3. Gears of War, UT3 all looked depressing as well. I like to see colour in the game, not depressing filters.

Redeemed
05-04-10, 12:07 PM
I'm losing interest in this game...

DansFace
05-04-10, 12:11 PM
I'm losing interest in this game...

lol agreed.
I keep forgetting about it..

NarcissistZero
05-04-10, 12:57 PM
Looks a lot worse than before, or I am nutty.

|MaguS|
05-04-10, 01:23 PM
Aren't these shots from the X360 Version?

http://www.destructoid.com/id-demos-rage-on-360-promises-smooth-gaming-on-ps3-172760.phtml

It's not like Fallout or Borderlands from what I remember since its a shooter with no RPG Elements.

Sean_W
05-04-10, 01:29 PM
Aren't these shots from the X360 Version?

http://www.destructoid.com/id-demos-rage-on-360-promises-smooth-gaming-on-ps3-172760.phtml

It's not like Fallout or Borderlands from what I remember since its a shooter with no RPG Elements.

The Anti-Aliasing looks too perfect for consoles to me.

dikinher
05-04-10, 01:36 PM
The graphics do not look any better than CoD: MW2. Low resolution textures galore. Now I can see how they plan to make this game run 60fps on consoles.

Destroy
05-04-10, 03:42 PM
Graphic setting indeed looks like Borderlands but thank gawd the toon crap style textures are not there. Looks decent enough. Still definitely on to buy list.

K007
05-04-10, 03:52 PM
wow...ultra low ress textures lol :<

Mr. Hunt
05-04-10, 04:02 PM
And you people wonder why studios are worrying about you less and less. Game looks fine to me from what I see... definitely has a Borderlands vibe to it and that is perfectly fine with me as long as the gameplay is good.

NarcissistZero
05-04-10, 04:57 PM
And you people wonder why studios are worrying about you less and less.

We should just pretend it looks better I guess.

Mr. Hunt
05-04-10, 05:17 PM
We should just pretend it looks better I guess.

No, but you people are not pleased with anything. I guess this is the reason I hated Crysis... I put gameplay before graphics. I am so glad I can play a game that doesn't look very good and not just cry about the graphics constantly.

Tygerwoody
05-04-10, 05:30 PM
wow that looks good.

10 bucks says it doesn't look half that good upon release.

Soetdjuret
05-04-10, 05:46 PM
The Anti-Aliasing looks too perfect for consoles to me.
Yes but you can still take pictures in a form of photomode for consoles am i right? Where you can have anti-aliasing or taking huge res screens and downsample them.. something like that.

The graphics do not look any better than CoD: MW2. Low resolution textures galore. Now I can see how they plan to make this game run 60fps on consoles.
Correction: the TEXTURES does not look much better than cod mw2 etc, but imo both the models the shadows and overall lighting looks lot better than the pretty average that is in MW2.

Viral
05-04-10, 05:47 PM
It looks ok besides the ground textures in the first few shots. Lighting in the last shot is very nice.

I'm a bit sick of the setting too, borderlands actually freshened it up with the cell shading look, but I still got sick of it there. I'm still pretty excited about this though.

Amaury
05-04-10, 06:23 PM
yep, this definitely has dropped in graphics quality (textures and lighting). of course this was going to happen with id/carmack making sure it runs at a playable 30-60fps on the ps3 and 360. Too bad we have powerhouse DX11 GPUs without any Crysis killer type game on the horizon utilizing them.

NarcissistZero
05-04-10, 07:52 PM
No, but you people are not pleased with anything. I guess this is the reason I hated Crysis... I put gameplay before graphics. I am so glad I can play a game that doesn't look very good and not just cry about the graphics constantly.

Well, I am still planning to get the game, and I still think it looks decent, it just does not look as good as the earlier screens, which is somewhat disappointing.

And I am quite pleased with most games' graphics.. Splinter Cell Conviction looks nice. I play old games all the time, more than new ones, despite them looking much worse.

I liked Crysis for gameplay as much as graphics.

I just think these screens look meh compared to the amazing outside screens from a year ago.

XxDeadlyxX
05-04-10, 08:09 PM
wow...ultra low ress textures lol :<

Yeh, Doom 3.5 anyone? :o

logan
05-04-10, 08:31 PM
No, but you people are not pleased with anything.
Ok, Mr. Generalization.

This isn't any game... Rage is supposed to showcase id's new Tech 5. Shouldn't it blow people away? I expect to be blown away, but these screens aren't exactly spectacular. It sounds to me like they'll be stuck with this engine for a long while and if it doesn't deliver, they're going to fall even further behind Epic and UE.

proliferazor
05-04-10, 08:39 PM
Graphics are not top of the line looking but the art design is nice, I like the way it looks. I'm more of a gameplay kinda person myself, we should wait for a few gameplay vids before making judgments.


Ok, Mr. Generalization.

This isn't any game... Rage is supposed to showcase id's new Tech 5. Shouldn't it blow people away? I expect to be blown away, but these screens aren't exactly spectacular. It sounds to me like they'll be stuck with this engine for a long while and if it doesn't deliver, they're going to fall even further behind Epic and UE.
Most devs are just keeping the status quo for consoles that's where the money is so there's not much point in developing a high powered graphics engine when they will make the most money just developing console graphic engines. Face it pc gaming is on its last leg unfortunately.

Viral
05-04-10, 08:43 PM
To be fair it doesn't look to be anything engine specific that is letting it down. It's more so the usual console limitations rearing its ugly (pun unintended) head. Low res textures are a bi product of multiplatform games. The only other thing that I notice is low polycount on the ground objects, which is disappointing in this new era of tessellation - but hardly unsurprising given most current games aren't anywhere further along on this aspect.

Destroy
05-04-10, 09:20 PM
PC version better damn well have a high res texture pack included in the game.

mojoman0
05-04-10, 09:28 PM
Just wish it would lose that rubber/metallic/gloss coating that every id game is imbued with