View Full Version : Warhead, Veryhigh + 16xQAA + 2560x1600 - 67fps
Soetdjuret
09-26-10, 01:16 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JktNjrfojsw&hd=1
67fps average. So is this the rig you need to max out crysis and maintain over 60 fps lol? 3 years after it's release? whahahaha
bob saget
09-26-10, 01:37 AM
MONSTER computer. STALKER and HEAVEN benchmarks are so pretty :wonder:
gerardfraser
09-26-10, 07:30 PM
What no love for ATI cards.Here a quick vid I did on the snow level in the Video for someone who did not believe my FPS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB8h68S2uj8
Also I might add my 480GTX are not bad either.
red777star
11-04-10, 01:28 PM
Crossfire barely works with 2 x HD5870 not to mention quad. It is interesting that he is getting 70FPS in Metro including DOF and Tesse. I had 3 Way Crossfire with HD5870 and whole game run like crap. Same CPU have like a guy in the video.
JasonPC
11-06-10, 11:24 PM
red777star strikes again
wysiwyg
11-11-10, 06:51 PM
i thought warhead ran maxed out at 1920x1200 pretty smoothly on my single 480
but 4 is only for the rich :(
Soetdjuret
12-19-10, 05:21 AM
i thought warhead ran maxed out at 1920x1200 pretty smoothly on my single 480
but 4 is only for the rich :(
Maxing out will require you to run 16xQAA in addition to dx10 and enthusiast settings.. and u cant do that on a single 480.
BioHazZarD
12-20-10, 05:53 AM
wow not cheap to run a 3 year old game..
Soetdjuret
12-20-10, 11:46 AM
In fact, using 16xQAA is pointless, because it doesn't look better than 8ggr AA. Even using 2x2SSAA makes the game look better than using high levels of AA and on the same time being less demanding.
So a 3 years old game. I¨'d say u can max it out using graphics cards for 360 dollars. When i say maxing out, am talking about Very high, dx10, 1920x1200, and 8xAA.. More is not sufficient.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.