How r my 9800 UT benches?

[bkswaney]

**** System Info ****
UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2003-04-07_17.42]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 3117 MHz with 511MB RAM
RADEON 9800 PRO (6368)

**** Map results ****
dm-asbestos flyby 1024x768
136.316706 / 268.264449 / 705.928031

**** Map results ****
ctf-citadel flyby 1024x768
58.656706 / 136.204212 / 372.953974

**** Map results ****
ctf-face3 flyby 1024x768
322.157891 / 2264.409655 / 2613.470349

**** Map results ****
dm-inferno flyby 1024x768
98.739024 / 179.296159 / 563.416150

**** Map results ****
dm-phobos2 flyby 1024x768
611.164384 / 3146.997944 / 3513.629368

**** Map results ****
dom-suntemple flyby 1024x768
83.554495 / 224.819675 / 715.459067

**** Map results ****
dm-antalus flyby 1024x768
97.604769 / 193.879251 / 713.110610

__________________________________________________ _

This was done with [H]ard UT bench.
Setting were all set to highest. :)

My 3DM scores r in my sig.

[CaptNKILL]

How about Botmatch results?

Flyby doesnt mean squat :D :p

BTW, what setting are you running with?

[SH64]

1)whats the setting ? is AA & AF enabled & whats their values?
2)like whats captNKILL said "flyby doesnt mean a squat" lets see some botmatch results!

[bkswaney]

**** System Info ****
UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2003-04-07_17.42]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 3117 MHz with 511MB RAM
RADEON 9800 PRO (Omega 2.4.74a) (6374)

**** Map results ****
dm-asbestos botmatch 1024x768
24.574455 / 88.725664 / 161.091608

**** Map results ****
dm-antalus botmatch 1024x768
10.299548 / 63.651637 / 118.075102

**** Map results ****
dm-asbestos flyby 1024x768
137.972902 / 277.259342 / 730.906529

**** Map results ****
dm-antalus flyby 1024x768
98.472272 / 197.280034 / 720.436181

_________________________________________________

Above r my epic ut scores.
They seem low to me.
That is what every setting at the highest in 1024 res.
I'm going to reboot and rerun them now.

[bkswaney]

Here they r rerun.
This is with No AA/AF at 1024.



_________________________________________________
**** System Info ****
UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2003-04-07_17.42]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 3117 MHz with 511MB RAM
RADEON 9800 PRO (Omega 2.4.74a) (6374)

**** Map results ****
dm-asbestos botmatch 1024x768
25.103257 / 88.798221 / 161.866384

**** Map results ****
dm-antalus botmatch 1024x768
9.961430 / 63.868852 / 120.999192

**** Map results ****
dm-asbestos flyby 1024x768
132.097116 / 280.061229 / 783.064507

**** Map results ****
dm-antalus flyby 1024x768
105.451428 / 200.271553 / 710.769436



__________________________________________________


Here r my 4xAA and 8xAF benches.
What is with my Min score?? 2fps
Is something wrong with my rig?


**** System Info ****
UT2003 Build UT2003_Build_[2003-04-07_17.42]
Windows XP 5.1 (Build: 2600)
GenuineIntel Unknown processor @ 3117 MHz with 511MB RAM
RADEON 9800 PRO (Omega 2.4.74a) (6374)

**** Map results ****
dm-asbestos botmatch 1024x768
2.392381 / 85.488083 / 158.682101

**** Map results ****
dm-antalus botmatch 1024x768
10.360094 / 61.782238 / 119.560791

**** Map results ****
dm-asbestos flyby 1024x768
96.292544 / 170.845122 / 547.148018

**** Map results ****
dm-antalus flyby 1024x768
81.757291 / 127.973273 / 356.044587

__________________________________________________

[bkswaney]

I was just noticing the 5900U review.
The 5900U's min was 23 FPS.

EDIT: It almost seems I have a little stuttering in the benchmark.
I have not noticed it playing tho. :confused:

Do I have a problem?
What is your min?

[Hellbinder]

Naw, Your fine..

There has always been some wierd error with the way UT2003 records results on the new ATi cards. Its dropping those low min numbers when the game isnt even loaded yet or something.

The game play itself never dips that low, not even close on a machine like yours.

[bkswaney]

Originally posted by Hellbinder
Naw, Your fine..

There has always been some wierd error with the way UT2003 records results on the new ATi cards. Its dropping those low min numbers when the game isnt even loaded yet or something.

The game play itself never dips that low, not even close on a machine like yours.


I agree. I noticed at the end of a test it kinda stops and starts again for a second. Weird.

I'm not going to worry about it tho. Playing I have not noticed any slow downs. :)

[Quitch]

At 1024x768 I can use 6x AA and 16AF... and my machine seems to be around the same specs as yours.

16 AF is almost no performance hit at all, so you should at least use that.

[bkswaney]

Originally posted by Quitch
At 1024x768 I can use 6x AA and 16AF... and my machine seems to be around the same specs as yours.

16 AF is almost no performance hit at all, so you should at least use that.


Thanx... yes i started using 16x AF last night.
I'm very suprised I take no more hit with it than 8x. :)

[B&R]

flyby or botmatch?? which one is more cpu or ram dependent??