Pny Geforce 5600 ultra benchmarks

[Seminole99ns]

Here are the scores for this card on my system of; Intel 2.6 800bus, Soltek 845pe motherboard, 512 ddr memory (3200) Seagate 80gig harddrive; using beta 51.75 and Windows 2003

3dmark 2001= 11,318
Aquarmark= 24,973
3dmark 2003= 3,398

Not bad!:cool:

[realODDSMAN]

Now rename all those programs to something different and the 5600 scores an amazing 1/3 of the original score. :eek:

[realODDSMAN]

BTW: I only scored 4000+ on 3Dmark 03 with a 9700 Pro.

Not oc/ed.

I dont believe a non-Dx 9 card could even come close.

[digitalwanderer]

Originally posted by Seminole99ns
Here are the scores for this card on my system of; Intel 2.6 800bus, Soltek 845pe motherboard, 512 ddr memory (3200) Seagate 80gig harddrive; using beta 51.75 and Windows 2003

3dmark 2001= 11,318
Aquarmark= 24,973
3dmark 2003= 3,398

Not bad!:cool:
How can you brag about benchmark score when you're running a known set of benchmark cheating drivers? :lol:

(BTW-I got 5800 on my 9700 Pro on 3dm2k3...but she was OCed like a mofo. ;) )

[Seminole99ns]

with the 4403 drivers under 3dmark 2001 i scored a 12,300, so these drivers are slower!

[The Baron]

I got 3309 stock on a 9600 Pro. With no cheats. :o

[digitalwanderer]

Originally posted by Seminole99ns
with the 4403 drivers under 3dmark 2001 i scored a 12,300, so these drivers are slower!
What's your 3dm2k3 score with the 44.03 set? :angel2:

[Seminole99ns]

i did not try 3dmark 03 with those drivers

[digitalwanderer]

Originally posted by Seminole99ns
i did not try 3dmark 03 with those drivers
I recomend you do before you go telling me the 51.75 set doesn't contain cheats. ;)

[Seminole99ns]

i test 4403 out and post my score in a bit

[micronX]

This poor dude comes onto an Nvidia forum to share his benchmark scores, and gets a bunch of griping remarks from the ATi heads.
You guy's should feel complete:rolleyes:

[ragejg]

Originally posted by Seminole99ns
Not bad!:cool:

No, not bad... :)

How do YOU like your card?

[Seminole99ns]

I love it! I can play all my games, with smooth framerates. It cost me 149.99 at bestbuy. Not bad for this card!

[Seminole99ns]

3dmark 2001 with 4403 was 2,685. The 51.75 drivers are stable and fast on my machine who cares if nvidia turned them up for direct x 9.0. All companies Nvidia and Ati cheat a little--lets get over it and start playing and enjoying our cards! :p

[Kev1]

:dance: :hug:

[Hellbinder]

3dmark 2001 with 4403 was 2,685. The 51.75 drivers are stable and fast on my machine who cares if nvidia turned them up for direct x 9.0. All companies Nvidia and Ati cheat a little--lets get over it and start playing and enjoying our cards!

They are lowing IQ on Dx8 in some cases as well as DX9.

BUT... Having said that.....

Everyone has the right to Enjoy the products they buy. If You are totally happy with your card thats great.

(I would caution you though that if you have any hopes of playing HL2 with full DX9 effects (Which you can do with a 9600pro) you may want to consider a trade in)

[digitalwanderer]

Originally posted by Hellbinder
They are lowing IQ on Dx8 in some cases as well as DX9.

BUT... Having said that.....

Everyone has the right to Enjoy they products they buy. If You are totally happy with your card thats great.

(I would caution you though that if you have any hopes of playing HL2 with full DX9 effects (Which you can do with a 9600pro) you may want to consider a trade in)
Hey, wait a minute! I thought I was the good cop and you were the bad cop... :confused:

[stncttr908]

I have a question for you...why are you running a P4 2.6C with an Intel 845 board? :confused:

[-=DVS=-]

I get 4500 in 3dmark 2003 , without any overcloak wiht setup below & good old Radeon 9700 Pro :drooling: ;)

[goofer456]

Originally posted by -=DVS=-
I get 4500 in 3dmark 2003 , without any overcloak wiht setup below & good old Radeon 9700 Pro :drooling: ;)

I get ~4700. However the R9700 is (still) much more expensive than the FX5600Pro. So the comparison is not really honest:D