PDA

View Full Version : Call of Duty


Pages : [1] 2 3

LiquidX
10-30-03, 10:40 AM
I have seen some great reviews already and someone had to have picked it up already. I know it will be great but what are your thoughts if you got it.:)

http://pcmedia.ign.com/pc/image/callofduty_062003_160.jpg

GameSpot 9.0
http://img.gamespot.com/gamespot/shared/editorschoice.gif

IGN 9.3
http://scripts.snowball.com/scripts/images/rsb_ecaward.gif

randsom
10-30-03, 03:31 PM
well, just a couple words

IT JUST FLAT OUT ROCKS

Mullins1060
10-30-03, 04:00 PM
unfortunately us lot here in the uk have to wait till next friday for it :( quite why i dont know

fallguy
10-30-03, 04:29 PM
Just a few shots.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Menu1.jpg
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Menu2.jpg
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Menu3.jpg

All settings on the highest that they can go, including sound. Got to have the best experience :)

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Serverscreen.jpg

Only a few servers up, some are locked
:mad:

fallguy
10-30-03, 04:30 PM
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Teamchoice.jpg

First screen you are greeted with when joining a online game.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Gunchoice1.jpg
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Gunchoice2.jpg

You get to choose which weapon you want, to adjust to your play style. Different weapons have strong/weak points as seen.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Game1.jpg

Only game pic I got so far, the server died when I just got started :( I left it at my game res, 1280x1024, and compressed it in a .JPG, and at medium quality. Hope my host holds up..

Really need a good server to play on. :cry:

fallguy
10-30-03, 04:31 PM
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Game2.jpg

This is why you dont host games on your cable..

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Killcam1.jpg

My killers eyes, thats me over to the right.

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/dfall/CoD/Killcam2.jpg

Me almost dead..

My first two deaths are by camping snipers :(

LiquidX
10-30-03, 05:58 PM
WOW! if you thought the demo's were intense wait untill your play the other maps. Its great. The multiplayer is ok but I really couldnt get into it because I kept getting connection issues. Simply great, one of those purchases you wont regret for a minute, I am 100% sure I will give it another go once I end it.:)

randsom
10-30-03, 07:45 PM
im not sure if the mp portion of the game needs a patch or some redicated servers, its almost unplayable for me at this point, and im on a very good cable connection. Im betting after few days and some good servers pop up,everything will be smoothed out.

LiquidX
10-30-03, 09:38 PM
They now have bunch of servers up and most seem to be running smoother than earlier. Whatever you do try *ripclans* 60 man server under search and destroy. Its so damn insane to be playing with so many people with no lagg.

Tesco
10-31-03, 05:32 AM
This is one game im sooo looking forward to. Its been on order weeks ago and im waiting on next Friday. Loved the MOH series, MP is awsome and the same goes for the BF1942 series. I do love my WW2 games!!!

stncttr908
10-31-03, 02:02 PM
Figures. I want to play the game for months and now that I do, it crashes. In the carride mission, my monitor goes into standby but the game still runs (I know this because there is still sound) and it refuses to come out of it until I reset. I was told to lower the texture settings from "extra" (max) to "high" so I did, and it helped for awhile, but the problem just happened again later into the level. I tried the cat 3.8's and the omega's, but no luck. Any ideas? I'll just have to wait for a patch more than likely.

fallguy
10-31-03, 04:44 PM
It did the same thing to me on the carride level. Just once though. Didnt do it before, and hasnt done it since. I am now in the British levels. Maybe it has to do with the cars moving or something.. dunno.

CaptNKILL
10-31-03, 06:32 PM
Ack, is it just me or do those screens look almost IDENTICAL to MOHAA? The models are almost the same exact ones and the maps look VERY similar. Not to mention its the same game engine.

Im not saying it doesnt look cool, but there are PLENTY of great WW2 games out already and they are all basicly the same game (with varying graphics and maps... but all have the same guns and missions). Day of Defeat, MOHAA, BF1942, Deadly Dozen and half a dozen others.

Id play this but I wouldnt buy it.... I payed about $130 for BF1942, Road to Rome expansion and MOHAA.... I should get this game for free :rolleyes:

CaptNKILL
10-31-03, 06:52 PM
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/medalofhonoralliedassault/screens.html?page=204

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/callofduty/screens.html?page=64

The biggest difference between the two screens graphics wise (well beside the fact that they are two completely different scenes :) ) is that the CoD screen has anisotropic filtering enabled to make it look sharper, and the models have stencil shadows.

Again, Im not bashing the game... but cant we have a little originality? How about a game based on an alternate reality world war 2? Oh wait, thats been done a few times already (RTCW, Iron Storm.. although that was supposedly in the '60s).... I guess they should have just MADE A GAME ABOUT ANOTHER WAR :p

Mike89
10-31-03, 06:55 PM
I also get a crash during the carride, and I have to reboot. Problem for me is it does it every single time in the same place, after the guy said there's a roadblock and then the car makes the first turn afterwards. I've tried it like 5 times in a row and it crashes in the same place so I'm stuck right there.

Mike89
10-31-03, 10:55 PM
I finally got past that bad spot by playing it in the game's safe mode. I played past the spot, saved, exited game, restarted game, set up the settings again and it's been ok from then on. Funny thing is there was still a lot of driving left with way more action than that first bad spot but the game played right through them with no problem. Some kind of glitch in that one spot it seems.

AngelGraves13
10-31-03, 11:49 PM
Originally posted by CaptNKILL
Ack, is it just me or do those screens look almost IDENTICAL to MOHAA? The models are almost the same exact ones and the maps look VERY similar. Not to mention its the same game engine.

Im not saying it doesnt look cool, but there are PLENTY of great WW2 games out already and they are all basicly the same game (with varying graphics and maps... but all have the same guns and missions). Day of Defeat, MOHAA, BF1942, Deadly Dozen and half a dozen others.

Id play this but I wouldnt buy it.... I payed about $130 for BF1942, Road to Rome expansion and MOHAA.... I should get this game for free :rolleyes:

I second that...it looks exactly like MOHAA just with better models. These games really need a face lift...like the Half-Life 2 engine or something...just to make it look appealing. I'm sure the game is great and all...but I don't even play old games because it's just sad to look at how ugly they look. lol.

LiquidX
10-31-03, 11:59 PM
In a way its like MOHAA but I think much better. The maps are huge and intense and the sound is icening on the cake. I have never felt as if I was in game as playing this, simply amazeing. Also 99 to life if the graphics on COD dont look good to you it has to be your card dude because it blows me away on my Ti4200. Not many games I think look better than it even though its a moddified quake engine.:)

CaptNKILL
11-01-03, 12:32 AM
Originally posted by LiquidX
In a way its like MOHAA but I think much better. The maps are huge and intense and the sound is icening on the cake. I have never felt as if I was in game as playing this, simply amazeing. Also 99 to life if the graphics on COD dont look good to you it has to be your card dude because it blows me away on my Ti4200. Not many games I think look better than it even though its a moddified quake engine.:)
See thats great, but wouldnt it have been better if they waited a few years and made an amazingly realistic WW2 shooter, rather than creating strikingly similar ones with slight improvements every other month?
I mean, look what they did with the Quake 3 engine! What could they have done if they waited until after Doom 3\HL2 engines are available? Or the NEXT wave of engines (3-4 years away Im guessing) that are nearly photo-realistic? Its just sort of boring having all of these new high-profile war games coming out based on the same technology (and gameplay, and weapons and missions....) as the last high-profile war game.

Skip the WW2 games for now and make something NEW... when the technology is actually DIFFERENT in a few years, MAKE A NEW WW2 GAME!

... ok enough ranting... im tired... probably will read this tomorrow and not recognize a word of it :lol:
:zzzz:

Mike89
11-01-03, 02:29 AM
No, it wouldn't have been better to wait a couple of years because then I wouldn't be able to play this game NOW.

What are you smoking dude? I don't know about you but I put together my system to play games and I'll take as many as I can get, there aren't enough good games that come out as it is. Your comments don't even make sense, hell we might as well all just go back to PII's and wait a few years to play games again.

And photo realistic games are a lot further away than 3 or 4 years.

CaptNKILL
11-01-03, 10:23 AM
Originally posted by Mike89
No, it wouldn't have been better to wait a couple of years because then I wouldn't be able to play this game NOW.

What are you smoking dude? I don't know about you but I put together my system to play games and I'll take as many as I can get, there aren't enough good games that come out as it is. Your comments don't even make sense, hell we might as well all just go back to PII's and wait a few years to play games again.

And photo realistic games are a lot further away than 3 or 4 years.
Like I said before, the game is good, but current WW2 shooters are all the same besides the graphics (and obviously, BF1942 is vehicle based) so why not hold off on spending a million dollars to produce last years game with slight improvements, then put the money toward a different type of game (try a WW1 shooter at least), or save it until you can make a WW2 game that totaly blows the others away (ie using HL2\D3 engines for amazing graphics, physics and effects). I guess Im not looking at it the same way you are.
Your view makes perfect sense from your position, but for the developers and the overall state of games, I dont know..... I (and many others)tend to be more impressed with games when they are huge steps over similar games... CoD appears to have added higher-res textures and iron-sights to MOHAA and made some new maps depicting the same battles from other WW2 shooters. Its just my preference, but Id have rather seen this game made as a realistic WW1, WW3, Korea, whatever war game or seen it held off until newer tech was available to make it more original.

Nutty
11-01-03, 01:02 PM
I (and many others)tend to be more impressed with games when they are huge steps over similar games...

Theres numerous problems with this tho.

1) Longer development time means alot more money used for development. Games cost millions of dollars to make already. This puts an even greater stress on the developers to get it right, otherwise they could go bust.

2) Doing huge steps in advancement is a risky thing to do. What if you dont get it right? Millions of dollars down the drain. Most games companies are teetering on the edge of financial abyss as it is. Theres been loads of companies in the UK going bust this year alone. This year has been dreadful for the gaming industry.

Tried and tested ideas may be annoying to you, but they're reasuring to publishers, and investors, who dont want the dev company to produce another Daikatana..

Why do you think soo many Hollywood films are just the same re-hash of same story, just with better effects on top? Because its financially safe.

It is annoying, that progress is dictated by financial security, rather than brainstorms of original ideas. But original ideas dont always put food on the table for your family.

btw, I've just ordered my copy.. gotta wait till the 7th tho over here in blighty.. ahh well.. :)

Nv40
11-01-03, 03:25 PM
btw, I've just ordered my copy.. gotta wait till the 7th tho over here in blighty.. ahh well..

ohh.. you will like it... anyone who likes MOHAA will enjoy COD.. :)

but i was surprised by the new feeling an gameplay of COD....
what i really like in single player is that you dont fight alone anymore.. is not you versus the entire german army ,is allies vs Germans.. the AI is quite good..
also the graphics are enhanced .. maps more colorfull ,more detailed ...characters uniforms,weapons use highresolution textures .. the effects of water/fire /explotions/ have been upgraded too.. :)

btw..
anyone knows why there is an option in the game settings for [NVIDIA FOG] - yes/no ?

Nutty
11-01-03, 04:56 PM
Presumably its the use of;

GL_NV_fog_distance entension of OpenGL.


Ideally, the fog distance (used to compute the fog factor as
described in Section 3.10) should be computed as the per-fragment
Euclidean distance to the fragment center from the eye. In practice,
implementations "may choose to approximate the eye-coordinate
distance from the eye to each fragment center by abs(ze). Further,
[the fog factor] f need not be computed at each fragment, but may
be computed at each vertex and interpolated as other data are."

This extension provides the application specific control over how
OpenGL computes the distance used in computing the fog factor.
The extension supports three fog distance modes: "eye plane absolute",
where the fog distance is the absolute planar distance from the eye
plane (i.e., OpenGL's standard implementation allowance as cited above);
"eye plane", where the fog distance is the signed planar distance
from the eye plane; and "eye radial", where the fog distance is
computed as a Euclidean distance. In the case of the eye radial
fog distance mode, the distance may be computed per-vertex and then
interpolated per-fragment.

The intent of this extension is to provide applications with better control over the tradeoff between performance and fog quality.
The "eye planar" modes (signed or absolute) are straightforward
to implement with good performance, but scenes are consistently
under-fogged at the edges of the field of view. The "eye radial"
mode can provide for more accurate fog at the edges of the field of
view, but this assumes that either the eye radial fog distance is
computed per-fragment, or if the fog distance is computed per-vertex
and then interpolated per-fragment, then the scene must be
sufficiently tessellated.


from
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/ogl-sample/registry/NV/fog_distance.txt

AngelGraves13
11-01-03, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by LiquidX
In a way its like MOHAA but I think much better. The maps are huge and intense and the sound is icening on the cake. I have never felt as if I was in game as playing this, simply amazeing. Also 99 to life if the graphics on COD dont look good to you it has to be your card dude because it blows me away on my Ti4200. Not many games I think look better than it even though its a moddified quake engine.:)

My 9800XT is just fine thanks, it's the engine...Quake 3? come on that's sooooo old now. I won't even install RTCW because it looks old. With Deus Ex 2 and Half-Life 2 and Doom 3 on the way...why would I want to play a game that looks like it should have come out 3 or 4 years ago? That's what I'm getting at! I gave my MOHAA copy away to some kid who wanted it...the game sucked so much I didn't even want to play it anymore.