PDA

View Full Version : upgraded but..


cricket
10-30-03, 08:17 PM
i upgraded from a 2.26ghz to the 3.06ghz(with hyper threading enabled now also)...i ran 3dmark 2001se before and after the upgrade. the score with the 2.26ghz was 11830, and with the 3.06ghz it was only 12,517...does this seem too low? after all i upgrade to 800mhz faster than before, or is the 3dmark2001se program more based on my video card performance than the cpu speeds? the rest of my specs are below:


pent 4 3.06ghz (with hyper threading enabled) 533 fsb
geforce 4 ti4600 with 45.23 drivers
direct x 9.0b
winxp home
i850e motherboard-intel
768mb rdram pc 800
80gb hard drive
400 watt silencer- power supply
nec nd100a dvd+r+rw/cdrw combo drive
lite on cdrw drive
sb live sound card

MUYA
10-30-03, 08:24 PM
Originally posted by cricket
i upgraded from a 2.26ghz to the 3.06ghz(with hyper threading enabled now also)...i ran 3dmark 2001se before and after the upgrade. the score with the 2.26ghz was 11830, and with the 3.06ghz it was only 12,517...does this seem too low? after all i upgrade to 800mhz faster than before, or is the 3dmark2001se program more based on my video card performance than the cpu speeds? the rest of my specs are below:


pent 4 3.06ghz (with hyper threading enabled) 533 fsb
geforce 4 ti4600 with 45.23 drivers
direct x 9.0b
winxp home
i850e motherboard-intel
768mb rdram pc 800
80gb hard drive
400 watt silencer- power supply
nec nd100a dvd+r+rw/cdrw combo drive
lite on cdrw drive
sb live sound card

Maybe you should have got more but a measure of CPU would probably be UT2k3 botmatch or commanche4 demo. Those should increase in your case.

MUYA