sbp
12-11-03, 12:28 AM
Yeah right! :bleh:
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&storyID=3962990
Really got to enjoy how this story was written by Reuters. The headline is diametrically in contradiction with the reality of the issue. Also intially on reading a person would believe the Wright brothers only flew the plane once, three years prior. But near the end of the piece they concede, "By the time Santos-Dumont got around to his maiden flight the Wright brothers had already flown numerous times, including one in which they flew 24 miles in 40 minutes." So, even though the Wright bros flew "numerous times", Reuters reports that "the secretive Orville and Wilbur Wright proved they had beaten Santos-Dumont ... three years earlier". o_O
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=scienceNews&storyID=3962990
Really got to enjoy how this story was written by Reuters. The headline is diametrically in contradiction with the reality of the issue. Also intially on reading a person would believe the Wright brothers only flew the plane once, three years prior. But near the end of the piece they concede, "By the time Santos-Dumont got around to his maiden flight the Wright brothers had already flown numerous times, including one in which they flew 24 miles in 40 minutes." So, even though the Wright bros flew "numerous times", Reuters reports that "the secretive Orville and Wilbur Wright proved they had beaten Santos-Dumont ... three years earlier". o_O