S3 Graphics DeltaChrome in action.

[moorfang]

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20031213/etc_deltachrome.html
Dunno which series this one was.
But the benchmark scores were not so well.
With AthlonXP 3200+:
3DMark2001: 4083
3DMark2003: na
FF XI Benchmark: 3300¡]High mode)

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20031213/image/ndcd1.jpg

[saturnotaku]

You sure that's the right score for 3DM01? 4083 puts it on par with a GeForce2 Ultra and I don't think that's right. 4083 for 3DM03 is pretty good, right about at Radeon 9600XT level. Now if it can be priced there, it'll definitely be a contender in the mid-end. :)

[3dfxfan]

"3DMark2001: 4083"
I am not impressed.

"3DMark2003: na"
Does it mean it crashed while running 3D Mark 03 ? :rolleyes:

[moorfang]

Translation by BabelFish:
BabelFish Translation (http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/urltrurl?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.watch.impress.co.jp% 2Fakiba%2Fhotline%2F20031213%2Fetc_deltachrome.htm l&lp=ja_en&tt=url)

[MUYA]

This is the page

http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/akiba/hotline/20031213/etc_deltachrome.html

Canot read japanese so I dunno which scores are which, if we have any forums members who could, would be intersting to findout the numbers

I do think the 4XXX onionmarks is for 3D mark 2003

I do not think anyone in their right mind will launch a dx9 3d card to compete with NVIDIA and ATI with such low scores on 3dmark2001 :D. I mean they were touting 20k on the deltacrhome weren't they?


MUYA

[MUYA]

cheers Taiwan for the babelfish thing..still not clear though :D

MUYA

[3dfxfan]

Notice the Babelfish translation says : "value in performance is not particularly high" :rolleyes:

[Dazz]

If i read that right they said it was respectable score of 4k so i would say thats with 3Dmark 2003. However if you look at that card you should know it IS NOT in the high end market. Also MUYA i thought you where japanese? Living in Hong Hong i thought you would of picked it up.

[MUYA]

Originally posted by Dazz
If i read that right they said it was respectable score of 4k so i would say thats with 3Dmark 2003. However if you look at that card you should know it IS NOT in the high end market. Also MUYA i thought you where japanese? Living in Hong Hong i thought you would of picked it up.

LOL mate I was born in Hong Kong but my dad was in the british forces (employed ..not Gurkha soldier) and I had the benefit of going to british army English schools since kindy. ie english all the way. Now, that means no local cantonese lingo and also no Japanese from a few thousand miles away too. :D I learnt a spot if french at secondary school from for2-3 and that was it. In fact, I am quite ashamed to say that though I can speak the lingua franca of Nepal,but I cannot write it, read it a sub primary level (teaching my self)....nevermind the tribal dialect. I can converse in rudimentary cantonese but Japanese? all i know is GENKI and KAMEHAMEWAH!

[3dfxfan]

Originally posted by Dazz
If i read that right they said it was respectable score of 4k so i would say thats with 3Dmark 2003.

Here is what I read :

the result respectively 4083, not yet indication, 3300 (High mode)

So that means 4083 for 3dMark2001, No result given for 3D Mark 2003 and 3300 for Final Fantasy


Notice that on the picture behind the card it is written in big JUNK
Guess that the word is very appropriate here. :D

[-=DVS=-]

JUNK ?
Maybe those are defective samples ;)

[Dazz]

If it is indeed 4083pts for 2001 then even intergrated video cards will trample it.

[Johnmcl7]

How good is the FF benchmark score, to try and compare the card? I haven't run or seen any results of this benchmark, so I don't know if that's a decent score or not.

John

[saturnotaku]

Originally posted by Dazz
If it is indeed 4083pts for 2001 then even intergrated video cards will trample it.

That was the kind of score I would get with a 1.2 GHz Athlon and a GeForce2. And lest we forget that 3DM01 scores can be heavily influenced by the CPU, the tests run on the page in question were done on a 3200+ Athlon. :eek:

[stefan567]

If it is indeed 4083pts for 2001 then even intergrated video cards will trample it.

[saturnotaku]

OK, see, it really boils my potato when people do what the poster immediately above this one did. I mean jeez, would it kill you to type a sentence to add something?

[EMunEeE]

Originally posted by saturnotaku
OK, see, it really boils my potato when people do what the poster immediately above this one did. I mean jeez, would it kill you to type a sentence to add something?

[Smokey]

^^ what he said :p

[CaptNKILL]

Originally posted by Smokey
^^ what he said :p

[PoorGuy]

(pb) :bye:

[AnteP]

Hello people, wake up:
"with the combination with Mobile Athlon 500MHz 3DMark2001 4083"

A 9800 Pro with a 900 MHz Athlon scores roughly 6500 points.
So I'd say 4083 with a 500 Mhz CPU (propably with less cache or something) is probably pretty OK.
Espcially when considering it's mobile rig. probably only with DDR PC1600 if even that.