Joe DeFuria
10-15-02, 08:47 PM
I see you still like to make a fool of yourself by making contradictory statements...same ol' Roscoe!
For the record, I never claimed, hinted or suggested that the NForce2 was based on 0.13 micron technology.
Um...for the record, you said:
Now let us re-cap what happened since May 1. NForce2 chipset was previewed in mid-July 2002. Was this alleged due date of August the due date of the NV30 or the NForce2?
And the author of the ee-times article claimed:
Some of that will come from a new graphics chip slated to arrive in August.
The new chip will be manufactured on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.'s latest 0.13-micron manufacturing process, Huang said. Huang did not reveal the name or specific features of the chip, but did say it was a fundamentally new architecture from the GeForce 4 Titanium introduced earlier this year.
And based on that, you come up with some baseless conjecture that the "August Date" might have been some confusion between nForce2 and NV30?! (Which then would make the nForce2 late, anyway...)
It's one thing to "read between the lines", Roscoe, it's another to make up an entire book.
The author could also have gotten the anticipated tape-out date mixed up with the "arrival" date.
Or the Author could have just been on an acid trip, too. Perhaps he was deaf and was making his best attempt at reading Huang's lips. Maybe the Author is actually ATI's CEO, and he's just trying to spread mis-information!! :rolleyes:
Then Defuria twists the meaning of "arrives" to mean something completely different to what most people would think arrives would mean.
Really? "Most people" would just think that "arrives" means "able to buy it / in stock?"
I'll just have to test that theory....
He's still steamed that all those years spent defending 3dfx and attacking NVIDIA (more like spreading FUD against NVIDIA) went for nothing. He's a 3dfx fanboy who refuses to accept that he lost the war. Time to let go.
Lol...Only you would consider this some type of "war", roscoe. There's a difference between attacking ill-conceived, contradictory, and fan-boy logic, vs. "attacking nVidia."
I have no reason to attack nVidia. Am I attacking nVidia here? How does arguing over whether or not a part is "late" some type of attack? The only relevant fact here is that the nV30 has yet to "arrive". Funny...I thougt I was attacking you, not nVidia.
But I guess since you feel the need to "protect any perceived" attack on nVidia, you feel that you are one in the same.
Get a breath of fresh air, Roscoe. These are only video cards and companies. Not worth fighting over.
Ill-conceived logic, on the other hand...
For the record, I never claimed, hinted or suggested that the NForce2 was based on 0.13 micron technology.
Um...for the record, you said:
Now let us re-cap what happened since May 1. NForce2 chipset was previewed in mid-July 2002. Was this alleged due date of August the due date of the NV30 or the NForce2?
And the author of the ee-times article claimed:
Some of that will come from a new graphics chip slated to arrive in August.
The new chip will be manufactured on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.'s latest 0.13-micron manufacturing process, Huang said. Huang did not reveal the name or specific features of the chip, but did say it was a fundamentally new architecture from the GeForce 4 Titanium introduced earlier this year.
And based on that, you come up with some baseless conjecture that the "August Date" might have been some confusion between nForce2 and NV30?! (Which then would make the nForce2 late, anyway...)
It's one thing to "read between the lines", Roscoe, it's another to make up an entire book.
The author could also have gotten the anticipated tape-out date mixed up with the "arrival" date.
Or the Author could have just been on an acid trip, too. Perhaps he was deaf and was making his best attempt at reading Huang's lips. Maybe the Author is actually ATI's CEO, and he's just trying to spread mis-information!! :rolleyes:
Then Defuria twists the meaning of "arrives" to mean something completely different to what most people would think arrives would mean.
Really? "Most people" would just think that "arrives" means "able to buy it / in stock?"
I'll just have to test that theory....
He's still steamed that all those years spent defending 3dfx and attacking NVIDIA (more like spreading FUD against NVIDIA) went for nothing. He's a 3dfx fanboy who refuses to accept that he lost the war. Time to let go.
Lol...Only you would consider this some type of "war", roscoe. There's a difference between attacking ill-conceived, contradictory, and fan-boy logic, vs. "attacking nVidia."
I have no reason to attack nVidia. Am I attacking nVidia here? How does arguing over whether or not a part is "late" some type of attack? The only relevant fact here is that the nV30 has yet to "arrive". Funny...I thougt I was attacking you, not nVidia.
But I guess since you feel the need to "protect any perceived" attack on nVidia, you feel that you are one in the same.
Get a breath of fresh air, Roscoe. These are only video cards and companies. Not worth fighting over.
Ill-conceived logic, on the other hand...