View Full Version : Should Rambo be arrested for helping bin Laden ?
Should Rambo be arrested for helping bin Laden in Rambo 3 ? :D
thcdru2k
10-03-02, 06:53 PM
hahaha
ROTFLMAO!!! I have no ruskus idea what you are going on about. :D
Originally posted by K.I.L.E.R
ROTFLMAO!!! I have no ruskus idea what you are going on about. :D
Rambo fighted with afghans in Rambo III, and bin Landen was on of their leaders, so.... :D
I doubt it was the "REAL" bin :p
ALobpreis
10-04-02, 03:02 PM
Why some people think all afghans are evil? It's the same as some muslims think all americans are evil, or thinking jewish are not human... :rolleyes:
BTW, funny topic. :D
Originally posted by ALobpreis
Why some people think all afghans are evil? It's the same as some muslims think all americans are evil, or thinking jewish are not human... :rolleyes:
No, it's the Taliban ! Rambo fighted with Taliban ! Taliban is evel ! :p :rolleyes: :D :D
thcdru2k
10-04-02, 07:21 PM
the jihad isn't even muslim, they break every muslim rule in the book. the are not suppose to declare war, they are not suppose to kill with fire, there is alot more. no real muslim supports the jihad and taliban. jihad doesn't even mean holy war. it means suffrage. muslims don't believe the jihad and suicide bombers will go to their "heaven", because killing declaring war against another by sneak attacking isn't allowed.
-=DVS=-
10-04-02, 08:26 PM
Lol this is funny :eek: :D
Jihad = I remember playing a game called Tzar. You can call a Jihad and attack your enemies with some good units.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-06-02, 03:56 PM
Wasn't that the movie that he got shot in the leg by a helicopter and then next scene he was okay with it? haha, I don't think the Taliban was around back then, but he helped the Moujahadin(eh), so yeah, he helped Bin Laden. LOL, anyways, Oliver North and my father knew and warned the US Government about Bin Laden in the early 80's, so did some other smart guys. They didn't listen, now look what happened. It'd be funny if they make another Rambo movie and he is in an iron lung, haha.:p
thcdru2k
10-06-02, 04:11 PM
yes, in a way, jihad does mean war, but in the eye of muslim, declaring war isn't allowed, that is what bin laden has done, declared a holy war, at that point their jihad is no longer accepted in the eyes of muslims. to a muslim, jihad means struggle, against the oppression of its people or religion.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-06-02, 04:13 PM
I know it is no the islamic religion's or muslim's fault for what happened, but, I have not really seen any Muslim leader really address the issue, it kinda reminds me of the whole Catholic Priest church abuse scandal, and how none of those "leaders" adress the issue and try to sweep it under the rug. oh well...
thcdru2k
10-06-02, 04:24 PM
actually, the president of iran has addressed the issue and said something among the lines of the terrorist should be dealt with religously because they have a warped view of the muslim religion. and muslim leaders in america have worked with catholic leaders and have made joint statements on 9/11 and condemn the acts of 9/11 as not being of true religion. i think the reason no islamic leaders in afghanistan have made any statements either because, they are corrupted by osama, or they fear of retalitation. afghanistan has had no university or traditional schooling for 20 years. that is why their views of the young men have been severly warped and brain washed by the taliban and bin laden.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-06-02, 04:28 PM
Originally posted by thcdru2k
actually, the president of iran has addressed the issue
I don't really care about what any dictator that calls himself a Mullah has to say. They are terrorists and totally illagitimate. They have also warped and hajacked the Islamic religion so they don't matter to me. Sorry.
thcdru2k
10-06-02, 04:31 PM
true..iran is a major sponsor of terrorism.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-06-02, 04:34 PM
Originally posted by thcdru2k
true..iran is a major sponsor of terrorism.
Almost, the Iranian people for the most part arent, just the dictatorship.
thcdru2k
10-06-02, 04:50 PM
yeah, their people are the exact opposite of the dictatorship.
The Taliban came into being in 1994. They came out of Pakistan religious schools and were supported by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia money. It was Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence that nurtured the Taliban movement in the early 90's and then subtained it after the Taliban became the government of Afghanistan in 1996.
Please note are the Taliban which ruled Afghanistan were not the same as the Mujaheddin. Some were the same, but other Mujaheddin were fighting the Taliban with the Northern Alliance. Former Mujaheddin like the leader of the Northern Alliance, General Ahmad Shah Masood, the proclaimed "Lion of Panjshir", who bin Laden had killed.
http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/11/wmass11.xml
The Iranians were no fan of the Taliban. In 1998, Iran massed troops on the Afghan border after the Taliban killed some Iranians. http://www.metimes.com/issue98-36/fr/frontpage.htm
Also, the Iranians and Taliban came from different branches of Islam. The Iranians are Shi'ite, while the Taliban came from the majority Sunni branch (http://www.pacificnews.org/jinn/stories/2.20/960930-afghanistan.html) {~90% of all Muslims}.
http://www.gospelcom.net/apologeticsindex/s31.html
You can be sure the Iranians didn't cry when the Taliban were swept out of power.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-06-02, 06:41 PM
Iran is still hepling Al Quaeda however, by giving the ones that fled into Iran shelter, the mullahs are really wishy-washy..
netviper13
10-06-02, 06:41 PM
Originally posted by |TX|-LORD-EX-BU
I don't really care about what any dictator that calls himself a Mullah has to say. They are terrorists and totally illagitimate. They have also warped and hajacked the Islamic religion so they don't matter to me. Sorry.
Woah there, Iran has actually behaved itself lately. They condemned terrorism and arrested many wanted terrorists. But Bush has to go after them with his 'terrorist' rhetoric so that he can look even better with his plan to finish what his daddy didn't.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-06-02, 06:50 PM
Sorry, I'll never trust the Mullahs in Iran, they are a dictatorship and support terror very much. If they have nothing to hide, why then did they accuse the US special operations operating near the Iraqi border that is close to Iran but still in Saudi Arabia, of spying? They would love to get their hands on any american and kill them. This only reflects my opinion on the mullah however. They support Hamas and other terror groups and are selling long range missile technology to North Korea and Iraq. In the rising tension in between the US and Iraq, the mullahs have said that they will help Iraq, even tho they are sworn enemies. The people of Iran suffer because of the mullahs, and hopefully they will overthrow the mullahs sometime within the decade. Bush's daddy didn't go against Iran, it was Raegan who sent in Delta Force to save hostages, they failed, and the Iranian media celebrated the fact that americans died in the operation. They even went out as far as to put out postage stamps with the pictures of the dead Delta Force members on them. Thats sick. So, labeling Iran as a terror state doesn't mean that Bush is trying to finish what his father didn't. It is an act of deterrance.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.