View Full Version : Why the french were right
Please U Dawg, read this paper, it's quite old but may be you will understand why we were right about this iraq war (particulary due to our bad experience in algeria) and may be you'll figure that americans had loosen their famous pragmatism in recent time
http://nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2003/1107nj1.htm
(popcorn)
your favorite french fries surrender monkey :condom:
OMG, must.. restrain... all... impulses... Eh, nm.. FROGS :rw:
vampireuk
03-20-04, 05:47 PM
The French were right in saying no to liberating a country full of people been opressed by a evil dictator? I disaproved of the war for the reasons given for going, but now with all the good that is done perhaps the french should just prepare their next surrender strategy to the germans and stop talking about how they are right all the time.
To quote some french kids:
Take your trash home
What a way for a person to talk about the person who saved their country :rolleyes:
Why are the French so ignorant and ungrateful these days?
vamp, i have doubt you had time to read the article when i see a so fast reply :eek:
anyway, what happened on your testosterone battle online game is not representative of the french .... may be some teenager idiots :/ ...
Sorry for them... but if i can tell you my own experience, i have a dozen of english friends and we never have bad words neither particular problems.
I appreciate english humour, just give us time , we can be friends :bounce:
.....except when it comes the six nation tournament .... owned:
vampireuk
03-20-04, 06:02 PM
I've never played the french in a online game, they've never done anything big enough to merit any part but the clueless idiots who need saving from something (foshiz)
I don't mind the french for the most part, until they start acting like arrogant ignorant fools. So generally its best for them to just say nothing :p
2fast4u
03-20-04, 07:39 PM
perhaps the french should just prepare their next surrender strategy to the germans
we are in no need to attack them and wont be for another 100 hundred years or so. this sh|tty sentence about french and surrendering to germans is really getting on my nerves. as for the historical argument.. for your consideration, the british forces supporting the french fled via dunkirchen. lets give us all a big hand for being so brave nations.
vampireuk
03-20-04, 07:44 PM
Yes it makes perfect sense to sacrifice forces that could be later regrouped to mount a offensive to free the cheese eating surrender monkeys :p
I have read all that stuff before. I don't agree with it and the French were only worried about their oil contracts in Iraq. the business dealing you guys had with Iraq is the ONLY reason you didn't want to mess up your cash cow. Now we spoiled that for you and you are mad. Tough.
To think you really believe you did this for "holy" reasons. LOL in your wildest wet dreams.
Look pastor I don't like the French. You guys are ungreatfull back stabbers. I have no respect for France. Nice place too bad the French live there.
The only time France can claim they helped the US was during the revolutionary war and even then you guys did it because you hate the brits.
We saved your asses twice in the early part of the last century and bailed you out of the mess you made in vietnam. We are still cleaning up your mess in Haitti. It is a flipping wonder why all your former colonies are messed up hell holes.
Can you tell I don't like the french? Can you tell I am mad at the French? Well I am. You frikin owe us big time and you just spit in our faces.
and, who controls the oil now??
Not the French :p
thats what you think...
:eek:
bush is really french and he has tricolore underoos
:eek:
we are in no need to attack them and wont be for another 100 hundred years or so. this sh|tty sentence about french and surrendering to germans is really getting on my nerves. as for the historical argument.. for your consideration, the british forces supporting the french fled via dunkirchen. lets give us all a big hand for being so brave nations.
If what you say is true, then why did France immediately offfer to surrender when Germany announced the reunification?
If what you say is true, then why did France immediately offfer to surrender when Germany announced the reunification?
:udawg:
My message was too short. So I lengthend it to at least 10 characters.
2fast4u
03-21-04, 05:08 AM
If what you say is true, then why did France immediately offfer to surrender when Germany announced the reunification?
oh you and your arrogance are a scream :baaa::
vampireuk
03-21-04, 05:24 AM
Don't get so wound up :angel:
Obviously you didn't read the paper and anyway .. we know already that your media source is biased cos you read "fox news" like if your are going to the church...
well ...., what is written is the truth, france was only the 13th-largest participant in the Oil for food program, The U.S. under that program bought more than 50 percent of Iraq's total oil exports, the French 8 percent ...
And for the "Holy" thing, please , let me laught out loud for what you said : The Chirac warnings was not for "holy"' things , may be call it real politic, but it was just to avoid the raise of terrorism threat. In fact, of course it was in our interest but it was not what you think "a systematic opposition to US policy". The terrorism Threat is just bigger now thanks to this bully attitude. Your administration and their followers (you!) just looks ridiculous in the world.
And don't throw away again your recurrent dusty pityfull argument "We saved your asses twice ....", French are grateful for what americans did after WWII but it is not a passport for us to be sheeps for century and century and say yes for all your stupid things. and "Holy" reasons were not really in america mind at the end of WWII when you saved us, it was more something you did against hithler threat and farther to keep the chessboard pawns front of sovietic bloc
And for our former colonies, there nothing to be really proud to, i agree, but i won't discuss this subject at any greater lenght since i won't have time to emunerate all the mess US did also in the past abroad. and what's happening now is just a youthfulness mistake because you don't have a big experience about arab world questions... But to admit errors is something impossible in your dichotomous brain and your anwer is just typical of your bad faith
the Big C "who control the oil now ?" is symptomatic of this pathetic arrogance... Conversations with you are always running out of fuel since you are always ending up to "we are top dawg" , look my "six shot gun", "i have a bigger penis"
:rolleyes2:
vampireuk
03-21-04, 10:16 AM
I think the French are just mad since nobody in the international community actually cares what they say :nutkick:
saturnotaku
03-21-04, 10:21 AM
I think the French are just mad since nobody in the international community actually cares what they say
You are correct, sir! :D
Obviously you didn't read the paper and anyway .. we know already that your media source is biased cos you read "fox news" like if your are going to the church...
well ...., what is written is the truth, france was only the 13th-largest participant in the Oil for food program, The U.S. under that program bought more than 50 percent of Iraq's total oil exports, the French 8 percent ...
And for the "Holy" thing, please , let me laught out loud for what you said : The Chirac warnings was not for "holy"' things , may be call it real politic, but it was just to avoid the raise of terrorism threat. In fact, of course it was in our interest but it was not what you think "a systematic opposition to US policy". The terrorism Threat is just bigger now thanks to this bully attitude. Your administration and their followers (you!) just looks ridiculous in the world.
And don't throw away again your recurrent dusty pityfull argument "We saved your asses twice ....", French are grateful for what americans did after WWII but it is not a passport for us to be sheeps for century and century and say yes for all your stupid things. and "Holy" reasons were not really in america mind at the end of WWII when you saved us, it was more something you did against hithler threat and farther to keep the chessboard pawns front of sovietic bloc
And for our former colonies, there nothing to be really proud to, i agree, but i won't discuss this subject at any greater lenght since i won't have time to emunerate all the mess US did also in the past abroad. and what's happening now is just a youthfulness mistake because you don't have a big experience about arab world questions... But to admit errors is something impossible in your dichotomous brain and your anwer is just typical of your bad faith
the Big C "who control the oil now ?" is symptomatic of this pathetic arrogance... Conversations with you are always running out of fuel since you are always ending up to "we are top dawg" , look my "six shot gun", "i have a bigger penis"
:rolleyes2:
Thank you for noticing my big penis. :wonder:
I will compare our past to yours. You really want to go down that route? I don't think you do.
The terrorism Threat is just bigger now thanks to this bully attitude. Your administration and their followers (you!) just looks ridiculous in the world.
Now this is a perfect representation of the Frog attitude regarding personal safety. Appeasement first. Do not make the 3rd world , azz-backwards, cave dwelling terrorists angry because they may strike us. Fine, all of those that want to walk on eggshells out of fear, be our guest. In the meantime, we will continue to do what is needed to protect us and our ALLIES.
Man, I do not think I have ever seen a deeper shade of yellow. (bur)
sytaylor
03-21-04, 05:52 PM
Now this is a perfect representation of the Frog attitude regarding personal safety. Appeasement first. Do not make the 3rd world , azz-backwards, cave dwelling terrorists angry because they may strike us. Fine, all of those that want to walk on eggshells out of fear, be our guest. In the meantime, we will continue to do what is needed to protect us and our ALLIES.(bur)
Bingo, apeasement is the lowest form of cowardice. There is nothing wrong with fair negotations, and conceeding points for a greater good, but rolling over and taking a spanking for some loud nuisances is nothing short of pathetic.
saturnotaku
03-21-04, 07:47 PM
but rolling over and taking a spanking for some loud nuisances is nothing short of pathetic.
But do you expect anything more from the French?
:udawg:
Riptide
03-22-04, 09:41 AM
we are in no need to attack them and wont be for another 100 hundred years or so. this sh|tty sentence about french and surrendering to germans is really getting on my nerves. as for the historical argument.. for your consideration, the british forces supporting the french fled via dunkirchen. lets give us all a big hand for being so brave nations.
Maybe if they hadn't staked everything on the maginot line, which should've been obvious per the end of WWI that it was useless (static defenses against a mechanized army? ummm.. no), it would've been a different situation. The sucess of the german attack was due in part to french incompetence, and not just with regard to the maginot line. You'll remember they outnumbered the germans as well, and had better tanks to boot (at first anyway).
2fast4u
03-22-04, 10:08 AM
Maybe if they hadn't staked everything on the maginot line, which should've been obvious per the end of WWI that it was useless (static defenses against a mechanized army? ummm.. no), it would've been a different situation. The sucess of the german attack was due in part to french incompetence, and not just with regard to the maginot line. You'll remember they outnumbered the germans as well, and had better tanks to boot (at first anyway).
you know this is a fairly interesting point you are raising and my historical knowledge matches with that but to be honest im not the right person to discuss military strategy with. i just dont care enough, sorry :)
Riptide
03-22-04, 10:14 AM
you know this is a fairly interesting point you are raising and my historical knowledge matches with that but to be honest im not the right person to discuss military strategy with. i just dont care enough, sorry :)
That's cool, I just wanted to take another stab at the French and see what I could get away with. ;)
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.