Any reason [ IMG ] tags disabled in sigs?

[XanderF]

Just curious, I happen to like having IMG tags in sigs - adds an extra level of identification for users.

Futuremark's forums do this - and to conserve bandwidth on the poor 56k'ers (even though we all hate and detest their very souls), they provide the option to disable sigs from your personal forum view (and, IIRC, you can even disable user avatars to reduce bandwidth).

Besides, I think I've crafted a pretty cool one:
http://xanderf.dyndns.org:8080/images/sigs/geforcefx.jpg

:nana: :D

[|JuiceZ|]

Simple, we've nvr allowed IMG sigs here do to the fact that it muddy's up the forum and we like to maintain a clean "feel" We have phun trying to keep them short, let alone allowing IMGs in them.

[vampireuk]

The day we allow sig images is the day Mike grows breasts, umm JuiceZ you best enable them :eek2:

[MUYA]

u mean breasts vamps? ;)

[vampireuk]

Yes :eek2:

[MUYA]

thought so ;)

[-=Gib-McFragger=-]

The day we allow sig images is the day Mike grows breasts, umm JuiceZ you best enable them :eek2:

That's not true, we have never allowed sig pics and Mike has always had breasts, that's why you are always over there 'visiting'. :lol2:

*Looks around for Mike* If he reads this I am toast, heh. :angel2:

[MUYA]

owned: