Pic of FarCry on R420!?!??!?!

[ajm786]

http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTA4MzE2NzQxNXlpMFA0d1pzbmZfMV8xX 2wuanBn

:eek:

[Mad-Hatter]

yeah, we have already seen that picture on another thread... im hoping that u dont actually think thats real right?

[ajm786]

:D Of course not. :D

[-=DVS=-]

Wow :eek: its so real puts any game to shame :afraid:

[3madcows]

OMG, that looks awesome! Bwahahahah.

I must say, that's a pretty good camera used to take that shot.

[ajm786]

No camera. That was prerendered. :D

[creedamd]

I can't wait to see in in FP32!!!

[arunabh]

wow ....
no way thats a pics by R420 ....not possible......
thats like a pic from a graphics card which would come out maybe in 2007.....:)

[SH64]

Hey ! this is real ! :D

[Edge]

Like I said in another thread, it needs some displacement mapping :D

[Geforce4ti4200]

thats amazing, seen it before too. guess an x880xt with pci-e is my next card

[SuLinUX]

Nice photoshop work. :lol2:

[stncttr908]

http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTA4MzE2NzQxNXlpMFA0d1pzbmZfMV8xX 2wuanBn

:eek:Bahaha, if only...

[MUYA]

Start a thread in the right sections lads please.

[halduemilauno]

http://www.hardocp.com/image.html?image=MTA4MzE2NzQxNXlpMFA0d1pzbmZfMV8xX 2wuanBn

:eek:

:screwy:

[Spotch]

More crap.... I was taking a close look and notices some artifacting. If you zoom in on the most brightly lit tree trunk to the right. There you can see a bit of blockyness and some banding. Must be a cheat by ATI. Either that or the FP24 limits on the card are showing up here.

:angel2:

[GamblerFEXonlin]

High dynamic range and enough polygons will get you that. Oh so it looks real huh, well nice polygons!

like 4 giga vertices/s perfromance in the CPU? we got gigapixels, now we need giga vertices! How about a dedicated polygon unit in the CPU instead of a dual core CMT CPU?

If people knew how good graphics could get with more polygons (http://jooh.no/root/omg_3dcards/PolyCount/nv30_bike.jpg) theyd pay as much for a CPU as a 3d card damit. Flat texture effect (http://jooh.no/root/omg_3dcards/PolyCount/fake_polygons.jpg) only get you that far.

[pat777]

High dynamic range and enough polygons will get you that. Oh so it looks real huh, well nice polygons!

like 4 giga vertices/s perfromance in the CPU? we got gigapixels, now we need giga vertices! How about a dedicated polygon unit in the CPU instead of a dual core CMT CPU?

If people knew how good graphics could get with more polygons (http://jooh.no/root/omg_3dcards/PolyCount/nv30_bike.jpg) theyd pay as much for a CPU as a 3d card damit. Flat texture effect (http://jooh.no/root/omg_3dcards/PolyCount/fake_polygons.jpg) only get you that far.
Displacement mapping makes bump-mapping look like real polygons. Still, a dedicated polygon unit sounds like a good idea.

[Nutty]

Huge number of polys is bad, you get alot of artifacting with sub pixel sized polys.

We have dedicated polygon units anyway, they're inside the gpu.. I dont understand what you're trying to say.