PDA

View Full Version : 6800GT scored 14680 3dmarks


Pages : [1] 2

991060
06-19-04, 07:56 AM
I heard GT will be available in retail channel from July 1st in China, can't wait to buy one home. :drooling: :drooling:

http://bbs.gzeasy.com/uploads/post-1-1087648755.jpg

MUYA
06-19-04, 07:59 AM
holy poop! but erm what about in games etc? ;)

991060
06-19-04, 08:07 AM
Forgot to mention that the test was run with a 3.85GHz P4. Since the card is not mine, couldn't provide any more information of it...

For God's sake, please put GT in the channel, nVIDIA. :bash:

Bad_Boy
06-19-04, 08:07 AM
nice score :D
i wonder what kind of cooling used and drivers.

cam9786
06-19-04, 08:09 AM
For in-game performance, more specifically Farcry, you can check out this page here http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/geforce_6800_ultra_extreme/page22.asp

It shows them OC'ing the GT to 425/1200 , and thats just 25MHz under the 14680 clock on 3dMark. At 1024 x 728 x 32 W/ 4X AA and 8X AF in Farcry, scoring 67.7 FPS Is REALLY something to boast about!

991060
06-19-04, 08:14 AM
nice score :D
i wonder what kind of cooling used and drivers.
61.34 was used, stock cooling, no mod to the card :clap:

http://bbs.gzeasy.com/uploads/post-1-1087649462.jpg

Bad_Boy
06-19-04, 08:24 AM
wow.

jAkUp
06-19-04, 10:18 AM
What? I clocked my card higher and never got a score that good...

Bad_Boy
06-19-04, 10:20 AM
yeah that is interesting, he said they used a 3.85GHz P4, but you have a 3.8ghz so theres not much difference. yours is clocked higher. weird.

rent
06-19-04, 10:32 AM
What? I clocked my card higher and never got a score that good...
There are so many possibilities...

What settings are you using in the drivers? I can get an extra 150-300 marks out of my 5900U by setting the image settings tab from Quality to Performance. If you're using coolbits, you can also set mipmap details from best image quality to blend.

Otherwise, I dunno :retard: Maybe they have something wierd you don't know about :P

grimreefer
06-19-04, 10:38 AM
his processor would have to be a 2.8e or a 3.2ee or a 3.4ee to beat urs

991060
06-19-04, 12:09 PM
lol, now the record becomes 15692:

http://img1.soufun.com/bbs/2004_06/20/1087663893610.JPG

Bad_Boy
06-19-04, 12:10 PM
:drooling: :drooling: :drooling: :drooling: :drooling: :drooling:

jAkUp
06-19-04, 12:40 PM
WTF? How is that possible??? What drivers is he using? I had mine set on performance in the control panel

-=DVS=-
06-19-04, 12:48 PM
Think he got it overcloaked 465/1255 , he got that with stock cooling ? :eek2: first score is overcloaked also , only few hundread 3dmark difference then Jakups.

Bvb123
06-19-04, 12:54 PM
Nice fake :screwy:

991060
06-19-04, 12:56 PM
Think he got it overcloaked 465/1255 , he got that with stock cooling ?
water cooling

-SKYNET-
06-19-04, 08:11 PM
Nice fake :screwy:


lol, you a stupid idiot.

Blacklash
06-19-04, 09:23 PM
Some people defeat the 4xAF that 3mark03 sets by default, and they also set their mip map and filtering to 'performance' rather than quality. Benching like that seems alittle disingenuous, if you do not qualify it by mentioning it. Most people don't cut these corners. I don't have a problem with people doing it if they make it known. Aka saying this is my bench, list card OC or default, then mip level detail-'best performance', image setting-'high performance', 4xAF off etc. Not mentioning it, seems misleading to me.

Most websites when they test use 'quality' setting to the best of my knowledge. The current crop of cards and should not need to rely on things like this to look good. I am speaking of 3dmark03.

reactiv8
06-19-04, 09:26 PM
oh man i just found out that GT was actually GEFORCE 6 series wheni i saw it on his picture on the destop.... :bash: noob......... :rolleyes:

grimreefer
06-19-04, 09:39 PM
his processor would have to be a 2.8e or a 3.2ee or a 3.4ee to beat urs
hey, i was right!!!!!!!
give me props
i demand props!!!!!!! :rolleyes:

grimreefer
06-19-04, 09:40 PM
Some people defeat the 4xAF that 3mark03 sets by default, and they also set their mip map and filtering to 'performance' rather than quality. Benching like that seems alittle disingenuous, if you do not qualify it by mentioning it. Most people don't cut these corners. I don't have a problem with people doing it if they make it known. Aka saying this is my bench, list card OC or default, then mip level detail-'best performance', image setting-'high performance', 4xAF off etc. Not mentioning it, seems misleading to me.

Most websites when they test use 'quality' setting to the best of my knowledge. The current crop of cards and should not need to rely on things like this to look good. I am speaking of 3dmark03.
i think everyone does that.

Bad_Boy
06-19-04, 10:10 PM
water cooling
?
i asked you the cooling and you said stock

nice score :D
i wonder what kind of cooling used and drivers.

61.34 was used, stock cooling, no mod to the card :clap:

-SKYNET-
06-19-04, 10:22 PM
?
i asked you the cooling and you said stock


450/1200 @ stock cooled
465/1255 @ water cooled

991060
06-19-04, 10:39 PM
?
i asked you the cooling and you said stock

450/1200 ---- stock cooling
465/1255 ---- water cooling