PDA

View Full Version : UT2k3 Benchmark scores.

LORD-eX-Bu
10-22-02, 04:09 PM
Just wondering, on Flyby is 144.970779 a good score? and on the Botmatch is 59.715698?
Needa916
10-22-02, 04:13 PM
Botmatch is what you should be looking at. That score looks good, but for your CPU, I would expect a few more FPS. Flyby does not represent in-game performance.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-22-02, 04:15 PM
Okay, thanks! I'll be optimizin' stuff then.:D
Needa916
10-22-02, 04:51 PM
Originally posted by |TX|-LORD-EX-BU
Okay, thanks! I'll be optimizin' stuff then.:D

Do you have "force Anti Aliasing or Anistropic Filtering in all applications" on? Then, that score is great. If you had either setting enabled, then that score is EXCELLENT.

Actually, type "stat fps" while in game in the console by hitting the "~". That will show your real FPS while playing. Although I get 40 something fps in the benchmark, my in-games frame rate is quite different. Sometimes it dips to 25fps - which sucks.
thcdru2k
10-22-02, 08:27 PM
59 for botmatch is sure better than the average ut2k3 player
Renzo
10-23-02, 10:30 AM
Retail: 1024*768*32

Direct3d
Flyby: 144,3fps
Botmatch: 64,7fps

Tbred 1900MHz (12,5*152MHz) on KG7lite
512MB Apacer PC2700 152MHz 2-2-2
GF4ti 306MHz/630MHz
LORD-eX-Bu
10-23-02, 02:07 PM
Wow, hmmm... then it looks like I am doing something wrong from your score.
thcdru2k
10-23-02, 04:41 PM
could also be a variety of different texture settings, skin textures, physics, lighting, projection, etc. different levels of af / aa.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-23-02, 06:55 PM
Originally posted by thcdru2k
could also be a variety of different texture settings, skin textures, physics, lighting, projection, etc. different levels of af / aa.

Yeha, I have everything maxed, tho I don't think AA is enabled.
thcdru2k
10-23-02, 08:50 PM
well than thats a great score you have there :)
Renzo
10-24-02, 05:21 AM
Originally posted by |TX|-LORD-EX-BU
Wow, hmmm... then it looks like I am doing something wrong from your score.
I think Athlon just runs UT2k3 better (according to many tests on tomshardware and anandtech an others like digit-life and tech-report) as it has NO SSE2 optimizations for P4. RDRAM would help you getting better botmatch scores.
LORD-eX-Bu
10-24-02, 02:06 PM
Maybe it would help me also if I didn't have everything set to ultra high.:D :p :D
Needa916
10-24-02, 07:44 PM
When you are running a benchmark, then it doesn't matter what your in-game settings are. The benchmarks set their own details, from which I understand, everything is already set to high.

I know what you are sating about the "ultra high" setting in one of the .ini files, but it shouldn't matter for the benchmark - maybe someone can verify?
LORD-eX-Bu
10-24-02, 08:42 PM
Originally posted by Needa916
When you are running a benchmark, then it doesn't matter what your in-game settings are. The benchmarks set their own details, from which I understand, everything is already set to high.

I know what you are sating about the "ultra high" setting in one of the .ini files, but it shouldn't matter for the benchmark - maybe someone can verify?

Sorry, should've cleared it up, but I am talking about in game performance now. Stays around 50-70 fps with everything ultra-high.
Renzo
10-25-02, 07:20 AM
Originally posted by Needa916
When you are running a benchmark, then it doesn't matter what your in-game settings are. The benchmarks set their own details, from which I understand, everything is already set to high.

I know what you are sating about the "ultra high" setting in one of the .ini files, but it shouldn't matter for the benchmark - maybe someone can verify?
True, but according to capabilities of the vidcard. GF4 results should be comparable to GF3 results IF the pixel shader version difference doesn't affect scores.