PDA

View Full Version : SWG Performance on a 6800U


jAkUp
07-08-04, 12:51 PM
For those of you that play Star Wars Galaxies, here is a performance review on a 6800 Ultra. I do not play this game, but it is an extremely demanding game with all the options maxed, so I decided to give it a whirl.

The performance isn't great..hehe.. but my friend still wished to know my performance, so I used his account and played for a bit :) Here goes nothin:

Stock Clocks 425/1.1

1600x1200 4xAA/16xAF
2004-07-07 22:49:36 - SwgClient_r
Frames: 378 - Time: 26346ms - Avg: 14.347 - Min: 10 - Max: 20

1600x1200 2xAA/4xAF
2004-07-07 23:08:29 - SwgClient_r
Frames: 557 - Time: 22199ms - Avg: 25.091 - Min: 18 - Max: 29

Here are some screenshots of the action, you can see the FPS in the upper right hand corner (56k warning):
The ingame graphics options I used (http://img49.exs.cx/img49/4239/SwgClient_r2004-07-0722-49-13-46.jpg)
More graphics options (http://img49.exs.cx/img49/695/SwgClient_r2004-07-0722-49-22-56.jpg)
And yet more graphics options (http://img49.exs.cx/img49/7388/SwgClient_r2004-07-0722-49-26-50.jpg)
1600x1200 4x/16x (http://img49.exs.cx/img49/3172/SwgClient_r2004-07-0722-48-48-76.jpg)
Another 1600x1200 4x/16x (http://img49.exs.cx/img49/1958/SwgClient_r2004-07-0722-52-09-98.jpg)
1600x1200 2x/4x (http://img49.exs.cx/img49/6051/SwgClient_r2004-07-0723-09-38-40.jpg)

Its kinda strange because when I'm in the city, the fps can dip pretty low... sometimes as low as 13fps, but when I'm in the forest/or jungle, it runs amazing... 29fps it is usually locked at.

EDIT:
A few more screenshots:
1600x1200 2x/4x
Nice shadows on the water (http://img46.exs.cx/img46/2305/SwgClient_r2004-07-0810-37-57-03.jpg)
More dynamic shadows in relation to the sun (http://img46.exs.cx/img46/7632/SwgClient_r2004-07-0810-36-38-25.jpg)
Swaying foilage (http://img46.exs.cx/img46/4445/SwgClient_r2004-07-0810-33-10-40.jpg)
SM2.0 Water (http://img48.exs.cx/img48/1914/SwgClient_r2004-07-0808-23-15-64.jpg)

mustrum
07-08-04, 01:15 PM
I played SWG for a while. Crappy game with a crappy engine. It's not like it would look that good compared to what hardware it needs to run smooth.

raf
07-08-04, 01:17 PM
I played swg for a year from launch until the bugs finally put me off for good - and you're right, it's hardcapped at 30fps. If you want to see the most demanding place visitable you should visit coronet in corellia during peak gaming hours... I never got a chance to play the game on this fx53 system but I'm sure even this would have been feeling the pinch in this area. Also, enabling shadows makes for some great effects but seems to be the biggest fps killer out of all the graphical options in this game.

|JuiceZ|
07-08-04, 01:19 PM
SWG is an example of an OK engine with very bad coding. Terrible lag, especially in cities. When I played, it was mostly hunting on the outskirts.

jAkUp
07-08-04, 01:22 PM
I'm curious as to how an x800xt plays it... I know an x800 Pro lags worse than the 6800U. I am also curious as to whether or not a faster CPU would make a big difference.

Turning on dynamic shadows is what really kills the fps. Dynamic as in changing to the position of the sun, etc. I wonder if that is all CPU based?

SignorSalad
07-08-04, 01:44 PM
OT alert:

Whats with all the characters in some of those screenshots shouting sales pitches about the stuff they have to sell or buy? It looks like its a non-stop used car commercial. I haven't ever played SWG, and don't knock anyone for their choice in games, but all those dudes shouting about their stuff for sale would get very old very quickly.

AthlonXP1800
07-08-04, 01:47 PM
Yeah I played SWG 14 day trial version and I find the game slow, bad coding and the graphics looked very outdated, it no matched to KOTOR. I am glad I played the trial, it will be waste of money to buy the full game and pay subscription monthly. :)

jAkUp
07-08-04, 01:48 PM
Yea, I'm not really much of a fan of MMORPG's either... a little too slow for my tastes :) But this is a pretty popular game for those fans of MMORPG's

A few more screenshots:
1600x1200 2x/4x
Nice shadows on the water (http://img46.exs.cx/img46/2305/SwgClient_r2004-07-0810-37-57-03.jpg)
More dynamic shadows in relation to the sun (http://img46.exs.cx/img46/7632/SwgClient_r2004-07-0810-36-38-25.jpg)
Swaying foilage (http://img46.exs.cx/img46/4445/SwgClient_r2004-07-0810-33-10-40.jpg)
SM2.0 Water (http://img48.exs.cx/img48/1914/SwgClient_r2004-07-0808-23-15-64.jpg)

Stolly
07-08-04, 03:00 PM
Who would have thought a game could have no stars or war and still call itself a starwars game ?

Draxus
07-08-04, 03:06 PM
What's your FPS standing infront of the coronet starport at 1600x1200 no aa or af? It's was a slideshow with my ti4200... lol...now that my account is cancelled i won't be testing it with my 6800gt.

Bad_Boy
07-08-04, 03:28 PM
thx for the benchmark jakUp (even tho i dont play SWG) :)
i cant wait to see the screens guildwars will show on the new cards :D the glow effect in that game has been perfectly done.