PDA

View Full Version : Athlon XP overclocking and performance


CaptNKILL
08-12-04, 03:38 PM
Well, Ive been trying to find articles covering this kind of thing, but it seems to be a lost cause.

I want to find out what kind of performance is possible with an Athlon XP overclocked to various speeds above 2.2Ghz (normal 3200+ speed). Im curious because Mobile 2500 and 2600 Bartons overclock to insane speeds. My brother just purchased a mobile 2600+, an NF7-S, and a 2x512Mb Corsair XMS PC-3200 kit (the best one). He is currently running his 2600+ at 2.6Ghz! There has to be a pretty good boost in performance from a normal 3200+, but I cant seem to find any benchmarks anywhere that go above 2.2Ghz for an XP.

What I want is GAMING performance, not 3d Marks, and I want to see compairisons to A64 systems. And I prefer scores with 6800 or X800 series cards (9800s were NOT CPU limited... the new cards are). I already know that 3dmark gives A64 users 4000 marks just because its 64 bit... I want to see real world gaming performance of highly overclock Athlon XPs vs. Athlon 64z.

I just have a hunch that an AXP running at 2.6Ghz (with 512 cache) has to be at least CLOSE to the performance of an A64 running at 2.1 or 2.2.

CaptNKILL
08-12-04, 04:07 PM
Well, there are a few articles i managed to discover today:

This one only got their 2500+ Mobile to 2.37 but it still comes close to A64 3000+ performance. Which is very good :)

http://www.hexus.net/content/reviews/review.php?dXJsX3Jldmlld19JRD03MjImdXJsX3BhZ2U9MQ= =

And this one is a huge review (although mostly synthetic and multimedia benches... which dont mean squat to me), but they still only got theirs to 2.4ghz. Still performs very well though:
http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2004q1/athlonxp-m-2500/index.x?pg=1

My system with a 2.09Ghz with 256K cache would probably see a pretty big improvement if I tossed in a 2.6Ghz with 512K cache.

Its a shame there arent more benches using current high end video cards though.

Pandora's Box
08-12-04, 04:21 PM
interesting. wonder how close to athlon 64 2800+ i am speed wise in games.

Pandora's Box
08-12-04, 04:22 PM
btw your brother, what motherboard is he using?

CaptNKILL
08-12-04, 07:36 PM
btw your brother, what motherboard is he using?
An Abit NF7-S 2.0, like I said :p :D

Lezmaka
08-14-04, 07:00 AM
Although I don't have any benches to compare, I recently made a similar switch.

I have a 6800GT and I went from an Athlon XP 2100+ @ 1950 (13x150) with a cheap MSI K7N2-V to a Mobile Athlon 2500+ @ 2200 (11x200/1.55V) with an NF7-S 2.0. There was a definate improvement in games for me, as well as some improvements in general Windows usage. I'm only running at 2.2ghz right now because my case+airflow sucks and I want to keep the temps down. The highest I have tried is 12x200 @ 1.75V and it seemed pretty stable, but as I said, the temps were a bit too high for my liking.

I think the cost of the mobo+cpu was worth the improvement I got (even at 2.2GHz), and if all I would have needed was the cpu, the it would most definately have been worth the $80-90 for the cpu.

Viral
08-14-04, 08:48 AM
The Tech Report have another review comparing the XP-M @ 2.4GHz to A64's and what not.

http://www.techreport.com/reviews/2004q3/athlon64-3500/index.x?pg=2

Unfortunately the results aren't as good as you (and I) had hoped :( But with a higher FSB the performance might be pretty close to an A64 3000+. But unfortunately just using the multiplier, it isn't. Of course this is 640x480 and 800x600. Actual gaming conditions will bring the results within 1fps of eachother.

Woodelf
08-15-04, 02:22 PM
Not that this is worth anything, but when my mobile 2.6 was at 2.7GHZ (briefly), according to sandra I surpassed the fx53 in cpu and multimedia by a fair amount. :)

walkndude
08-15-04, 03:12 PM
Why not just install your 6800 in your brothers system and find out first hand ?