My own Benchmark

[jimmor]

:wtf: jimmor those results just look WAAAY off...everyone elses 5900's are getting 13-15 avg FPS mine at 550/1000 only did 15.7..... and it should look the same as the pic posted in the 1st post

I just found out if I use a 6xxx driver, then I get same pic as first post, but with much reduced FPS. Must be something missing or not switched on with the 53.03 drivers that the last runs were done with. Knew something had to be wrong, because of so much blue in display and every other FX user getting so much less. But didn't know why, and nowhere did it say it was driver dependent ?

So new and much poorer results I just did with 66.00 driver are,

Benchmark duration: 22.002(s).
Total number of frames: 326.
Minimum number of frames: 7.81228.
Maximum number of frames: 16.7838.
Average number of frames: 14.8168.

Obviously not a test meant for FX cards, and I wonder how much the rest of your computer setup, or actual Nvidia driver, matters ??

[jimmor]

UPDATE:

Just did another run at 550/970 and got following,

Benchmark duration: 22.0087(s).
Total number of frames: 381.
Minimum number of frames: 8.69241.
Maximum number of frames: 19.6176.
Average number of frames: 17.3114.

[Da Alians]

Benchmark duration: 22.426(s).
Total number of frames: 49.
Minimum number of frames: 2.03176.
Maximum number of frames: 2.49221.
Average number of frames: 2.18496.


go 5200!

[cho]

Ok

Should it be something like

ScreenCap.txt

TakeScreen: 1
CameraPosition: x y z
CameraTarget: x y z
CameraUpVec: x y z
BlockAction: 1

my idea is set a hot key for record the screen info and save the info like what you mention:) and set another hot key to replay the still frame from the "screencap.txt" .

[mrsabidji]

Benchmark duration: 22.426(s).
Total number of frames: 49.
Minimum number of frames: 2.03176.
Maximum number of frames: 2.49221.
Average number of frames: 2.18496.


go 5200!
:clap:
Great. You made my day, thanks. :D

mrsabidji

[Sazar]

no edit key :(

Benchmark duration: 22.0269(s).
Total number of frames: 635.
Minimum number of frames: 4.84818.
Maximum number of frames: 31.6033.
Average number of frames: 28.8283.

[Rev_Night]

0AA/0AF:
Benchmark duration: 22.0183(s).
Total number of frames: 795.
Minimum number of frames: 0.930645.
Maximum number of frames: 39.9157.
Average number of frames: 36.1063.


4AA/8AF:
Benchmark duration: 22.0413(s).
Total number of frames: 318.
Minimum number of frames: 3.75283.
Maximum number of frames: 14.9916.
Average number of frames: 14.4274.


amd 2800+
abit nf7
512 crucial pc2700
ati 9800xt, default settings

[991060]

I have a question, why is it "MAD newPosition, -toSubtract, lightPosition, vertex.position;" rather than "MAD newPosition, -toSubtract, lightVector, vertex.position;"

The former gives correct, but the latter is what it should be in theory, quite weird.

[Scott@Bjorn3D]

Benchmark duration: 22.0021(s).
Total number of frames: 2010.
Minimum number of frames: 33.7492.
Maximum number of frames: 104.207.
Average number of frames: 91.3548.

[Frittz]

Benchmark duration: 22.0006(s).
Total number of frames: 2221.
Minimum number of frames: 88.9891.
Maximum number of frames: 115.329.
Average number of frames: 100.952.
_________________________________________________

Asus P4C800-E Deluxe | 3.2 GHZ Intel P4 | 2 GB Corsair MXS Platinum | 74 Gig Raptor SATA | BFG 6800 Ultra OC | XP Sp2

[fivefeet8]

Benchmark duration: 20.0073(s).
Total number of frames: 2523.
Minimum number of frames: 114.566.
Maximum number of frames: 133.078.
Average number of frames: 126.104.

BFG 6800 ultra OC @450/1.24

[Mr.Clawz950]

BFG 6800Ultra OC @ 450/1260

Benchmark duration: 22.002(s).
Total number of frames: 2996.
Minimum number of frames: 120.318.
Maximum number of frames: 152.969.
Average number of frames: 136.17.