A64 3200+ 1Mb Cache+eVGA 6800GT, 3Dmark2k3, WoW !

[garikfox]

Wow !

OS. x32 XP Pro w/SP2, Forcware 66.00

CPU@2.1Ghz :)

http://members.cox.net/garikfox/3dmark.jpg

[Cruel_Logic]

is this your score!??!?!??!
and if so what did you do, what kind of opts? what mode, performance? quality?
what are the clock speeds of your gt? are you using stock cooling? HELP MEEEEEEEEE
man, i dont see how this is possible....

[garikfox]

is this your score!??!?!??!
and if so what did you do, what kind of opts? what mode, performance? quality?
what are the clock speeds of your gt? are you using stock cooling? HELP MEEEEEEEEE
man, i dont see how this is possible....


Drivers 66.00 also thats 1024x768 SCORE BTW :)


CORE 350MHz/1Ghz etc... NRM GT DEF's...

[myshkinbob]

I could smell the fishiness of this thread before i even loaded Opera, how about you post the compare url so we can look at the details of the tests and the system config it ran under. :)

[Arioch]

I thought I saw a thread here about some "hack" that affects rendering and can lead to inflated scores. That could be the case here.

[rellingsen]

Something fishy with that score. He's either encountered a bug or been playing with the NULLPS2.x check box in the drivers. I know with my CPU at 3.84g and my Ultra at 455/1.28 I can barely crack 14,000. I also want to see the compare link.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3019208

[Blacklash]

Something fishy with that score. He's either encountered a bug or been playing with the NULLPS2.x check box in the drivers. I know with my CPU at 3.84g and my Ultra at 455/1.28 I can barely crack 14,000. I also want to see the compare link.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3019208

A waterblock and being creatively "ghetto" with a portable AC unit got me to 492/1.30. I am not saying this approach will work for everybody and I have seen legit scores in the mid 14's when the Ultra core is from 470-500 on a rig like yours.

EDIT: Some drivers do perform better than others in 3dmark03. For me it takes 3.81, 254(3-3-2-5) with Turbo GAT, and the card on 492/1.30. I have seen a guy with a 3.06 at 3.4 with an Ultra on 480/1.30 pull 14.1. The best AMD+Ultra score I have seen in a forum was from a FX-53 of course with a card at 499/130. He was doing 14, 723.

[jAkUp]

Well, I barley cracked 14K at 450 core...

[rellingsen]

A waterblock and being creatively "ghetto" with a portable AC unit got me to 492/1.30. I am not saying this approach will work for everybody and I have seen legit scores in the mid 14's when the Ultra core is from 470-500 on a rig like yours.

EDIT: Some drivers do perform better than others in 3dmark03. For me it takes 3.81, 254(3-3-2-5) with Turbo GAT, and the card on 492/1.30. I have seen a guy with a 3.06 at 3.4 with an Ultra on 480/1.30 pull 14.1. The best AMD+Ultra score I have seen in a forum was from a FX-53 of course with a card at 499/130. He was doing 14, 723.

I agree that legit 14000 scores are obtainable in 03 with the Ultra even on air. That's why I posted my 3DMark03 compare score of over 14000. I just wanted to see the original posters compare link seeing that he is claiming a score of well over 15000 with a GT.

[Dazz]

Beat my Radeon 9800 :o http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2675562

[Blacklash]

OMFG! Yo Yo Yo YO,

I been doing dis all wrong. I had 4xAA/16xAF turned on my benches! I modded my bios to um nine volts and OCed my card to seven fiddy on the core. Check dis out>


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3026721