View Full Version : Zell Miller, Wrong Party.
http://bushlies2.us/
http://bushlies2.us/video/zell_miller_msnbc.wmv
Son Goku
09-02-04, 03:19 AM
Oh wow, your link provides
http://cirus.webserversystems.com/suspended.page/
This Account Has Been Suspended
Please contact the billing/support department as soon as possible.
I guess Zen Miler doesn't pay his bills or something... Well, unless you have a copy of what he wrote, I guess that's all there's to say...
SquireSCA
09-02-04, 05:46 AM
http://bushlies2.us/
Zel Miller is a real Democrat, in the tradition of JFK, and I would even include Joe Leiberman in that group. He is a reminder of what the party used to be, before the extremist element like Howard Dean, Michael Moore and John Kerry took it over...
That's why the current Dems hate him.
You said it, I'm proud to have that man as my Senator!
The real shame is that everything he says falls on the deaf ears of his party. Or maybe it's ears that have been plugged with their fingers while they say "lalalalalalalalaa" over and over and over...
SquireSCA
09-02-04, 08:35 AM
You said it, I'm proud to have that man as my Senator!
The real shame is that everything he says falls on the deaf ears of his party. Or maybe it's ears that have been plugged with their fingers while they say "lalalalalalalalaa" over and over and over...
True dat. Our state will miss Zel.
AHAHAHAHA Zel pwned Kerry.
Draconis
09-02-04, 10:12 AM
haha this is the only democrat I will ever like he owns.
sabrewulf165
09-04-04, 10:39 AM
Zell Miller is an @-hole and a tool. If I were the Dems I'd be glad he jumped ship, cuz I doubt his inflammatory rhetoric is going to help the republicans any.
And if anyone disagrees with me, they should emulate their hero and challenge me to a duel! :p
Oh sabrewulf the LAST thing you liberals should complain about is inflammatory rhetoric. The last 3 years you libs have been bashing the president nonstop. Making up poo left and right and believing it also. So, just take you lumps. You guys can dish it but you sure can' take it.
sabrewulf165
09-04-04, 11:38 AM
LOL UDawg I'm not a liberal, I just think Zell Miller is full of it, and I'd rather have someone besides Bush in office for the next 4 years. Personally I very rarely even get involved in politics or political discussion, which is a testament to what Bush has accomplished ;) Personally I think (hope) we will see a higher than normal voter turnout this year... of course it would be nice if we ALWAYS had 90%+ turnout like a lot of countries in Europe, but oh well.
Anyway like I said, I'm not a liberal, so there's no need for you to go generalizing and such.
Oh and BTW, I know... I KNOW you're not going to start talking about the Democrats bashing the president. Oh PLEEEEASE tell me you're not going to be the pot that called THAT kettle black :D
sabrewulf it has been the nastiest 3 years the liberals have engaged in since Reagan was in office.
intercede007
09-04-04, 09:17 PM
In the summer of 1940, I was an 8-year-old boy living in a remote little Appalachian valley. Our country was not yet at war, but even we children knew that there were some crazy men across the ocean who would kill us if they could.
President Roosevelt, in his speech that summer, told America "all private plans, all private lives, have been in a sense repealed by an overriding public danger."
In 1940, Wendell Wilkie was the Republican nominee.
And there is no better example of someone repealing their "private plans" than this good man. He gave Roosevelt the critical support he needed for a peacetime draft, an unpopular idea at the time.
And he made it clear that he would rather lose the election than make national security a partisan campaign issue.
Shortly before Wilkie died, he told a friend, that if he could write his own epitaph and had to choose between "here lies a president" or "here lies one who contributed to saving freedom," he would prefer the latter.
Where are such statesmen today?
Where is the bipartisanship in this country when we need it most?
Now, while young Americans are dying in the sands of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, our nation is being torn apart and made weaker because of the Democrat's manic obsession to bring down our Commander in Chief.
What has happened to the party I've spent my life working in?
I can remember when Democrats believed that it was the duty of America to fight for freedom over tyranny.
It was Democratic President Harry Truman who pushed the Red Army out of Iran, who came to the aid of Greece when Communists threatened to overthrow it, who stared down the Soviet blockade of West Berlin by flying in supplies and saving the city.
Time after time in our history, in the face of great danger, Democrats and Republicans worked together to ensure that freedom would not falter. But not today.
Motivated more by partisan politics than by national security, today's Democratic leaders see America as an occupier, not a liberator.
And nothing makes this Marine madder than someone calling American troops occupiers rather than liberators.
Tell that to the one-half of Europe that was freed because Franklin Roosevelt led an army of liberators, not occupiers.
Tell that to the lower half of the Korean Peninsula that is free because Dwight Eisenhower commanded an army of liberators, not occupiers.
Tell that to the half a billion men, women and children who are free today from the Baltics to the Crimea, from Poland to Siberia, because Ronald Reagan rebuilt a military of liberators, not occupiers.
Never in the history of the world has any soldier sacrificed more for the freedom and liberty of total strangers than the American soldier. And, our soldiers don't just give freedom abroad, they preserve it for us here at home.
For it has been said so truthfully that it is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us the freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech.
It is the soldier, not the agitator, who has given us the freedom to protest.
It is the soldier who salutes the flag, serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who gives that protester the freedom to abuse and burn that flag.
[...]
But don't waste your breath telling that to the leaders of my party today. In their warped way of thinking America is the problem, not the solution.
They don't believe there is any real danger in the world except that which America brings upon itself through our clumsy and misguided foreign policy.
It is not their patriotism -- it is their judgment that has been so sorely lacking. They claimed Carter's pacifism would lead to peace.
They were wrong.
They claimed Reagan's defense buildup would lead to war.
They were wrong.
And, no pair has been more wrong, more loudly, more often than the two Senators from Massachusetts, Ted Kennedy and John Kerry.
Together, Kennedy/Kerry have opposed the very weapons system that won the Cold War and that is now winning the War on Terror.
Listing all the weapon systems that Senator Kerry tried his best to shut down sounds like an auctioneer selling off our national security but Americans need to know the facts.
The B-1 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, dropped 40 percent of the bombs in the first six months of Operation Enduring Freedom.
The B-2 bomber, that Senator Kerry opposed, delivered air strikes against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Hussein's command post in Iraq.
The F-14A Tomcats, that Senator Kerry opposed, shot down Khadifi's Libyan MIGs over the Gulf of Sidra. The modernized F-14D, that Senator Kerry opposed, delivered missile strikes against Tora Bora.
The Apache helicopter, that Senator Kerry opposed, took out those Republican Guard tanks in Kuwait in the Gulf War. The F-15 Eagles, that Senator Kerry opposed, flew cover over our Nation's Capital and this very city after 9/11.
I could go on and on and on: against the Patriot Missile that shot down Saddam Hussein's scud missiles over Israel; against the Aegis air-defense cruiser; against the Strategic Defense Initiative; against the Trident missile; against, against, against.
This is the man who wants to be the Commander in Chief of our U.S. Armed Forces?
U.S. forces armed with what? Spitballs?
Twenty years of votes can tell you much more about a man than twenty weeks of campaign rhetoric.
Campaign talk tells people who you want them to think you are. How you vote tells people who you really are deep inside.
Senator Kerry has made it clear that he would use military force only if approved by the United Nations.
Kerry would let Paris decide when America needs defending.
I want Bush to decide.
John Kerry, who says he doesn't like outsourcing, wants to outsource our national security.
That's the most dangerous outsourcing of all. This politician wants to be leader of the free world.
Free for how long?
For more than 20 years, on every one of the great issues of freedom and security, John Kerry has been more wrong, more weak and more wobbly than any other national figure.
As a war protester, Kerry blamed our military.
As a Senator, he voted to weaken our military. And nothing shows that more sadly and more clearly than his vote this year to deny protective armor for our troops in harms way, far away.
[...]
From John Kerry, they get a "yes-no-maybe" bowl of mush that can only encourage our enemies and confuse our friends.
[...]
Right now the world just cannot afford an indecisive America. Fainthearted self-indulgence will put at risk all we care about in this world.
In this hour of danger our President has had the courage to stand up. And this Democrat is proud to stand up with him.
Rob_0126
09-05-04, 12:15 AM
Zell Miller might not have been the best governor in our state, but he sure is tons better than the current one, Purdue :lame:
Purdue is slashing everything in this state, that matters to a whole lot of people. I dont really have much good to say about him. :|
As for Zell speaking out, I say good for him. Come to the light Zell. :)
sabrewulf165
09-05-04, 11:26 AM
sabrewulf it has been the nastiest 3 years the liberals have engaged in since Reagan was in office.
what's that got to do with your statement being hypocritical? :p
intercede007
09-05-04, 12:03 PM
And if anyone disagrees with me, they should emulate their hero and challenge me to a duel! :p
Who, Alexander Hamilton?
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.