View Full Version : Far Cry, The Truth?
Razorman
09-07-04, 02:51 PM
http://ubbxforums.ubi.com/6/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=400102&f=452106891&m=120006117
Check out this locked thread at the official Far Cry forums, makes very interesting reading.
Seoulstriker
09-07-04, 03:21 PM
I hope it's true.
Could be true , but with the way its stated & the info he provided .. i dont buy it .
also as the mod in that forum said .. he could not even type very well which is wierd for a ... "Technical Producer" :rolleyes:
Just can't see a guy in a high position as his, making all those spelling mistakes....seems like a 13 year old kid messing around on the forum. I think we would have heard from quite a few gaming site/sources that crytek had split up.
Agreed with the consensus here. If it is true, then that fellow isn't very professional.
Intel17
09-07-04, 05:12 PM
I hope it's true.
Now why do you say that? :)
WeReWoLf
09-07-04, 06:01 PM
Don't forget that all the farcry developers are german. not everyone is a perfect speller online.
True, I wasn't basing my impression on spelling/grammar alone though.
superklye
09-07-04, 10:10 PM
I really hope this isn't true because I want all those juicily delicious graphic updates coming in 1.3.
Pandora's Box
09-07-04, 10:51 PM
did they (ubi or crytek) actually say there will be a 1.3 patch? i mean like officially? if so they have to give us one right?
WeReWoLf
09-07-04, 11:25 PM
Yeah they have confirmed a 1.3, but they are under no obligation to publish one.
AthlonXP1800
09-08-04, 12:01 AM
Just can't see a guy in a high position as his, making all those spelling mistakes....seems like a 13 year old kid messing around on the forum. I think we would have heard from quite a few gaming site/sources that crytek had split up.
:rofl Maybe you forgetten about a highest position at Valve who is completed thick head made 2 blunders at network security last year and unbelievable he used his name as password a few weeks ago. : (rofl2)
God I hope he not going to make the 3rd blunder next time when the game gone gold. :rolleyes:
Intel17
09-08-04, 05:07 AM
I thought FC was dead anyway...
Skinner
09-08-04, 06:49 AM
What a bunch of bull comes along on the internet, and some people over there whome taking that serious ;)
Wait...if most of the Crytek people left, who's developing the Xbox version of Farcry: Instincts?
zoomy942
09-08-04, 09:21 AM
wow. this news sucks. maybe i should just reinstall the 1.2 patch so i can enjoy SM3.0
I thought FC was dead anyway...
maybe your system sucks or you are a biased doom3 lover... :)
BioHazZarD
09-08-04, 10:48 AM
i hope its not true.
if true, then this doesn't look promising for the 1.2/1.3 patch... Tis a shame.
:|
Those guys probably took the money from ATI and Nvidia for the extra SM2.0b/SM3.0 pathes and ran with it.
Those guys probably took the money from ATI and Nvidia for the extra SM2.0b/SM3.0 pathes and ran with it.
:lol2: .. you know as funny as that sounds .. it might turn to be true .
there should be an explanation for the patch 1.2 withdrawal & delay & the future for patch 1.3 :ORDER:
its look like the Crytek are hiding behind Doom3 release & expect the gamers to forget about it .
theultimo
09-08-04, 04:54 PM
My idea: EA killed them, like they do to all their francises.
My idea: EA killed them, like they do to all their francises.
What do EA have to do with FarCry ?? FarCry is published by Ubisoft AFAIK .
Seoulstriker
09-08-04, 06:21 PM
Now why do you say that? :)
They can start working for other companies. FarCry was basically a techdemo for them.
to the developers of farcry, dont let this game go to waste...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...FARCRY is the epitome of first person shooter games... don't let down all the gamerz that play this game...;(
...i need a new patch badly... 1.1 & 1.2 patch does not fix the shadow rendering problems of farcry when using geforce 6800 cards... ;(
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.